The Textile Industry : The World 's Economy And Daily Lifestyle

Do you think that English textile factories were bad for the health of working class families. Use evidence from at least two of the documents to support your claim.

Technology brought the “ready-to-wear revolution” to the people. The spinning jenny and the power loom makes mass production of clothing effortless. Various clothing and sizes were now available to everyone. The value of clothing and jewelry declined due to overproduction.

How fast fashion is affecting the environment is a very serious topic since this type of consumerism in the United States is heavy on supply and demand, and because of that shoppers want it all and want it now which is basically fast fashions motto. The way to make these pieces of clothing heavily rely on cheap materials that can be made quickly, so that is polyester and cotton being made in big factories that emit out toxins into our earth. Cotton being one of the most used fabrics takes a lot to be made into a single garment. Uzbekistan which is the 6th biggest producer of cotton had faced many conflicts during production since cotton uses so much water to be made it has dried up the 4th largest lake the Aral Sea because of how much we need to produce cotton fashion. (Prospectjournalucsd) Buying these cheap garments that become unwearable after 5 times (Forbes) of wearing it usually gets thrown out after and producing more waste that gets put into our waterways since theses garments shed easy and through washing them can “find their way into oceans and on the shores everywhere.” (Sweeny) So with the help of shoppers, being able to cut down on the purchase of fast fashion can help aid in keeping the ecosystem in order.

From 1880s-1930s mechanization has increased in both Japan and India. More machines had started to be used than using one’s hands which produced more cotton than hand spinning would have. Female workers were overworked in the cotton factories that favored using machines instead of hand spinning to increase the production of cloth and yarn.

The Indian textiles chart showed how India used machines to produce greater yarn and cloth amounts in 1914 as compared to the production in 1884. As well it demonstrated how the amount of people using machine made textiles had greatly increased opposed to hand made textiles (Doc 1). In 1916 Radhakamal Mukerjee, an Indian economist, explains how that handwoven textiles cannot keep up with the machine made textiles, and therefore is on a decline (Doc 6). This identifies how India is moving towards

During this time period, Japan and India had an increase in the machine-produced textile materials. A data chart gathered by British colonial authorities (Doc. 1) shows the production of cotton yarn and cloth in India. As the year increase, the hand spun yarn production rate has decreased and dropped 60 millions of pounds. While it shows the number of machine spun

When explaining the Fairtrade Cotton certified clothing that is emerging in the market, he evokes a sense of happiness and accomplishment as “growing organic cotton is better for the environment, and farmers are no longer exposed to dangerous chemicals” (83). On the other hand, Jeffcott examines how the Fairtrade Cotton label fails to mention the conditions of the workers who turn the cotton into clothing. By doing this, Jeffcott makes the reader feel happy and guilty because while the material for clothes grows in better conditions, the lives and wellbeing of the workers making the clothing remain unknown. He also goes on to discuss the different fires throughout the years that have taken the lives of women workers in the sweatshops. The reader, whether male or female, can draw an emotional connection by putting themselves in the shoes of the female workers and wondering how they would feel if forced to work in the conditions that the current sweatshops

The Industrial Revolution was the greatest transformation period in human history. When people think about the Industrial revolution, they think about big steel, machines, and railroads. What’s missing are the exhausted, overworked laborers that operated the machinery that made things run. A prime example is the female textile mill workers from England and Japan. In the textile industry, women and young girls were the main employees. The main reason for this is that nimble fingers were needed to tend the spinning and weaving machines. Originally spinning and weaving were done at home or small spin shops but the Industrial revolution changed that by bringing house spinning and weaving to factories. With the mass production of textiles,

Fashion is everything to society and the media. The fashion industry has transformed into a necessity in the life of people. Everyone wants to look good, feel fabulous and feel as if we belong with everyone else. The envy and desire to wear certain things and look a certain way all come, from wearing the latest fashion handbags, accessories, dresses, shoes, and the list goes on. But, when is considering fashion into an individual’s life going too far to the extreme? Many do not consider the whereabouts of fashion materials and how the environment is affected by the mere existence of certain garments. Some may believe these objects grow on trees. But that is clearly not the case. Even though it would be nice. The fashion industry as a

In 1789 a young man came to America from England with a plan in his head. The plan was a detailed layout for a water-powered spinning machine and the man was Samuel Slater. The introduction of this technology sparked the start of the, eventually, massive textile industry. The textile industry in America was slow moving at first, with failures along the way. However, President Jefferson’s embargo in 1807 allowed the industry to pick up; during the War of 1812 textiles exploded onto the scene. However, these textiles often had poor working conditions, workers led difficult lives, and the technology was still developing. Textile mills would continue to change and grow from their boom in the early 1800s and throughout the 1900s.

In this article, Barenblat outlines some of the key reasons as to why fast fashion is detrimental for women and the environment. The author supports her claim by suggesting fast fashion is expensive for the planet, encourages young women in poverty to work in sweatshops, and leads to million tons of landfill each year. This information in the article is useful because it provides relevant statistics on the damages caused by the clothing industry.

Peter Singer provides evidence which helps us analyze the effects of poverty that exist in the fashion world. As exposed in the documentary The True Cost, the nature of free enterprise and the new world of business in a globalized economy has created a sense of hopelessness for millions of people. The cost of becoming an instrument of labor as visualized in the movie has force us to reevaluate what is important to our own humanity? Our introspective thoughts infused by a compelling oratory given by Shima Akhter one of forty million garment workers forces us to ask ourselves what can we do alleviate poverty in the world? The “Fast Fashion” industry has generated trillions of dollars for those few individual at the top of big business while the common garment workers are being destroyed by absolute poverty.

The Civil War inadvertently brought ready-made clothing to us, and it is here to stay. The era of ready-to-wear clothing, though a revolution in itself, should also be viewed as a positive trend that continues to provide consumers with time-efficient and abundant choices through advancements in machinery and new distribution models. Though arguably the unforeseen outcome of a coincidence, the impacts of ready-made clothing have had huge implications on our everyday lives. Thank you for your

After the Civil War and the reconstruction era, textile mills become one of the main labor sources in the New South. Textile mills were brought from New England and were preserved for whites. The mills were a hit down south because southerners were known to take what they were handed, and were less likely to rebel when compared to union workers from the North. The health conditions in the mills were horrible and the employees were underpaid, but the people that the cotton mills attracted were poor and needed work so they continued to work in the mills because it meant being able to provide for one's family.

There are a large amount of social and environmental problems within the global apparel industry.