The Theoretical Feasibility Of Fuzzy Sets

The prevalence and severity of extreme changes in climate will likely affect how much energy is produced, delivered and consumed all over the world. There?s pressure to produce more energy resources for the growing population that have been depleted by unsustainable production systems. Impetus to better manage nonrenewable energy resources must become part of market systems and signals that form decision making in energy resources.

Though humanity still has developed industrial systems, there have been laws and social norms put in place to protect the environment. Odum discusses fuel-powered systems in industrial areas, “they require so much energy and create so much waste heat and pollution, that they have an enormous impact on the other two environments.” In 1993, this was true since the primary use of energy was coal, oil, natural gas, all carbon emitting energy sources. However, countries like China, Germany, the United States have reduced the emission coming from these fuel-powered systems in the past 25 years. There are now other options for environmentally clean power, people are recycling their trash, using less water, and cutting back energy usage.

In the last two decades, climate science has achieved great development, but climate information is not currently effectively used by decision makers and stakeholders (Miles et al., 2006). A gap exists

Global Thermostat has developed a groundbreaking technology not just to capture CO2 (Carbon Dioxide), but also to tap a trillion-dollar market and sell it. The company hopes to achieve its mission by leveraging new technology with market-based thinking. However, there still exist potential issues in terms of technology, economy and society, being the obstacles of implementing the ambitious plan. Technologically, it has been noted that effectively capturing large amount of CO2 from air is actually more costly that the company claimed. Economically, at this time, no one will invest or fund Global Thermostat because of the lack of practical business model. In the social aspect, the ability of Global Thermostat’s technology to capture CO2 from the air will give the society a false hope that CO2 emission will not be a problem anymore. Considering all the issues, Global Thermostat has to decide what adjustments need to be made in its commercialization plan.

WonderingMind42 begins with the premise that we can lessen the problem to one of the four possible outcomes outlined in the grid. The rows represent the theory that the worst outcomes of Global Warming is on its way or is not. The columns represent our choice to do something or do nothing. He examines the situations of ending up in each one of the four quadrants. According to WonderingMind42, because we cannot be completely sure about the science, we need to find a different way to choose our course of action.

It is becoming increasingly certain that climate change will have severe adverse effects on the environment in years to come. Addressing this issue poses a serious challenge for policy makers. How we choose to respond to the threat of global warming is not simply a political issue. It is also an economic issue and an ethical one. Responsible, effective climate change policy requires consideration of a number of complex factors, including weighing the costs of implementing climate change policies against the benefits of more environmentally sustainable practices. Furthermore, this analysis must take place amidst serious gaps in the existing research and technology concerning the developing climatic condition.

The United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change asserts that the time at which it is impossible to limit global warming to 2 degrees Celsius by mid century is precariously near. The 2-degree target was adopted by the countries within the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate change, also known as the UNFCCC. The UNFCCC also released a report that stated that carbon emissions need to reduce by 40 to 70 percent worldwide by 2050 in order to achieve the 2-degree target. Put simply, we must sacrifice what is convenient and compromise, while we still have the choice to do so.

Further, the literature review suffers from an additional lack of clarity in the paragraph on the bottom of page 634. Here, the authors begin to delve into the theory and rationalization behind including uncertainty as an appropriate measure. The authors write, “Uncertainty can affect an individuals willingness to act on environmental beliefs in several ways” signaling to the reader that a laundry list of factors is to follow. However, they only make mention of one tangentially linked evidence based factor, that an increase in the complexity of issues leads to increased uncertainty in the scientific community. No further examples in support of uncertainty follow this one. Instead, the authors pivot towards unfounded speculation about uncertainties role in individuals willingness to take environmental action, and then they abruptly transition to their discussion of trust. The issue of uncertainty persists in the manner with which the authors have chosen to operationalize their research question.

The objectives of this campaign are to expose to the public about the low carbon society such as their advantages and disadvantages. Transitioning to low carbon society requires an understanding of community practices and resultant emission, as well as the technologies, infrastructures and institutions associated with and accessed by the society. Moreover, it also requires an understanding of the connections between these integrated system components, its dynamics, a defined transition and potential levers involved in transitioning. This paper accepts the notion that ’levers’ includes program designed to achieve practice or behavior change in households which result in less carbon intensive lifestyles, and focuses on the factors that shape human behavior and influence householder energy consumption. From that, the communities will understand more about the low carbon society concept. This is because the cooperation between the engineers and the communities are important in order to achieve the mission. Basically, the engineers will organized this campaign all over Malaysia to let all the communities in Malaysia know about this mission. So, the engineers and the public can interact with each other and also can exchange ideas in making the mission more successful. As we know, different people have different opinion and suggestion, so, from that we can gather all the information and create the best one in order to achieve the mission. To sum up, the contribution of engineers in organizing the ‘Low Carbon Society Campaign’ and educate the public can lead in working towards the ‘Low Carbon Society ‘for

They looked at two scenarios, inaction, where business’ continue finding and using carbon as they see fit, and action, where business’ use a low-carbon energy mix. They found that not only would the investment cost of the action scenario be no more than inaction, but it would even cost a bit less- 190.2 trillion dollars for action and 192 trillion dollars for inaction. This is before even considering the amount of money saved by the effects of the action scenario itself. The report found that, “the difference in climate damage costs between low (1.5°C) warming and high (4.5°C) warming scenarios could be as high as $50 trillion” (Business Insider). The effect of such a large economic company reporting this data is the perfect example of how using economics for the sake of reversing global warming can be really beneficial. The argument often used by economists is that becoming more sustainable would hurt the economy, but the data in this report proves just the opposite, and how terrible it would be if we did nothing. For the sake of investment in industry’s like coal and gas, this information is often denied. But this is not anywhere near the first time industry’s have had to adapt due to uncontrollable events. This report emphasizes the importance of recognizing

L.A. Zadeh, Fuzzy Sets [33] In 1965 the concept of fuzzy logic was first introduced by the Professor Lotfi A. Zadeh in the University of California, Berkeley [33]. Fuzzy logic is a powerful design system for implementing the artificial intelligence in the controller which provides simple and intuitive method for software engineers to implement logic in complex systems. This concept had been given in one amongst his research papers under the name Fuzzy logic or Fuzzy sets.

Estimating future emissions is difficult, because it depends on demographic, economic, technological, policy, and institutional developments. Several emissions scenarios have been developed based on differing projections of these underlying factors. For example, by 2100, in the absence of emissions control policies, carbon dioxide concentrations are projected to be

Many methods have been developed to simplify the decision making process. In this paper, the rational model of decision making will be discussed first. Then, some of the factors that cause deviation in the rational

The most of global energy production produces from fossil fuel such as coal, oil and natural gas. The vast fossil fuels generate energy which use for many purposes for instant residential, transportation and industrial sectors. While the rate consumption of fossil fuel higher than their formation leads to oil price crisis. Another concern of fossil fuel combustion is the impact on the environment. Global warming is a significant problem which results in increasing concentrations of greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. These problems drive researchers and societies to search alternative energy such as switching to renewable energy or carbon-free energy to replace fossil fuels. For example Nakata et al., (2011:465) show ‘low-carbon society’

Another key task is the reduction of carbon dioxide emissions since the energy transfer to renewable and clean energy sources will help to get rid of emissions from power plants based on coal and natural gas. In Germany, 30 % of CO2 emissions accounted for the production of electricity (Energiewende 27). According to the Chairman of the Expert Council on Ecology, Martin Faulstich, Germany can achieve a full transition to renewable energy sources (i. e. rejection of nuclear power, oil, gas, and coal) by 2050. In accordance with his words, the plan is feasible from a financial point of view, and in the long term this strategy is economically more profitable. The program of energy sector modernization in Germany, which provides that the share of renewable energy, including biogas, geothermal, hydroelectric, wind, and solar