The Theories And Aspects Of Management

Theories gave organizations a framework for knowledge and a guide to achieving their goals. The Industrial Revolution prompted the need for better supervision of workers to boost productivity within the automobile, steel, and coal industries. It is because of this need that the various theories of management began to take shape.

Management has experienced remarkable shifts in the way that organizations conduct business particularly in the last century, due to the evolving workplace as well as tremendous changes in the roles of leaders in organizations. Early managers often relied on authoritative tactics to get the job done, which we have learned from history does not work very well for many modern organizations. In this paper, I will be analyzing the management approach my organization takes and whether this is the best approach to meet organizational goals and whether or not my organization may benefit from adopting a different approach or combining multiple approaches.

With the support of relevant examples, examine the development of management theories and how these theories may affect the management practices in PRIMARK:

Throughout the essay I hope to be able to interpret the management skills that are essential in today’s working environment. I will also hope to explain my own positive and negative experiences I have come across throughout my working career. The main areas I will cover in this essay on management skills are Leadership, Teamwork, Partnership, Networking, Delegation and Negotiation.

Adam is assigned the task of increasing productivity at Guitarras Dominguez while Salvador takes pride in the craftsmanship of 3the work. Adam is unsatisfied with the production rates of Guitarras Dominguez and shows Salvador his solutions to the issues of low production, which Salvador refuses to acknowledge and emphasizes that they would not lower their standards just to meet a quota (Daft, 2014). They do not see the full potential to their working alongside each other.

Many people believe they can either be a good or great manager. The actual reality to this is some people are actually not fit to be a manager either because they do not know what to do or because they do not know how to handle themselves. Throughout this paper, management styles will be discussed, and the qualities of a good manager.

It is my aim within this essay to introduce, define, and theoretically explain the management principle that is organising. Paramount to explaining organising it is important to understand the characteristics that are often used to describe management such as: goal orientation, decision-maker, activity integration, and connective processes. Each characteristic represents an important managerial concept; take for example goal orientation, which is the primary task of utilising resources, knowledge, and time to achieve expected results. Synonymous to achieving results management requires a decision-maker, in addition to activity integration. A decision-maker will oversee various departments, like marketing, production, finance, and human resources (HR), whilst activity integration will connect these departments to work cohesively together. This integration completes connective processes resembling five steps: planning, organising, staffing, directing and controlling (Chaganti and Sambharya, 1987). From an abstract perspective the management process will always start with planning and end with controlling, however to cohesively develop management, organising becomes a fundamental tool (Hawes and Thanopoulos, 1989).

Over the past hundred years management has continuously been evolving. There have been a wide range of approaches in how to deal with management or better yet how to improve management functions in our ever changing environment. From as early as 1100 B.C managers have been struggling with the same issues and problems that manager's face today. Modern managers use many of the practices, principles, and techniques developed from earlier concepts and experiences.

A good manager not only knows the basic management principles but is able to put them into practice. While knowledge alone cannot replace experience and common sense, it is a vital ingredient in creative decision-making. The remainder of this chapter focuses on basic concepts of

Management is the successfully built relationship between the manager and their staff. It is the manager’s responsibility to share the motivation, work ethic, and knowledge with their staff. With the managers setting this example, it shows the progressive work styles that the staff can acquire to differentiate themselves from the ordinary from the good and the exceptional. To create a successful bond between management and staff it requires having an open mind and understanding is what will lead it to success. By having a positive, open mindset it will lead to having a stable management that has a foundation built on leadership, communication, and development. A manager’s essential role is to build a foundation that entails those aspects

An organization is built on many different pieces of a puzzle all pulled together by an effective management team. Chaos can arise if employees do not know what to do or who to follow, which instills the need for a leader in the work environment. Although anyone can step up and call him or herself a leader, it takes an individual with specific traits and characteristics to do the job effectively, additionally, one must be able to distinguish between the product and the people who make it possible. Understanding the difference between managing and leadership, task allocation to get the job completed in a timely manner, employee needs, knowing what motivates employees, communication, and problem solving are all part of the daily elements of any manager. Top priorities of an organization must be thoroughly acknowledged and conveyed to effectively manage day-to-day business, while keeping in mind the employees who make it all possible.

In today’s ever changing economy, society’s idea of management is becoming increasingly more difficult to sustain with the continuous demands of the position. A successful manager must have a certain level of expertise and problem solving techniques to carry out the daily tasks required. Over the years, there have been various ideas on what management is, such as planning, organizing, leading and controlling.

Recently, in my workplace, the IT department went through a reorganization phase, which resulted in many people changing or gaining job roles. Our manager appointed and delegated some of her responsibilities to someone who has been on our team for many years, which officially makes them our team lead. The only issue I have with this individual, and so do others, is their style of managing that happens to be micromanaging. Her style of managing has created a tense working environment that makes it difficult to work in each day. Everyone seems to be on the edge all the time and each day there seems to less positive energy detected. Myself as well as other co-workers agree that management should be informed and suggestions should be made to either reconsider a different team lead or have management work with our team lead to make them aware of the situation and work on a plan that will improve her management style. Using the rational approach to change, management can develop a plan for the change initiative and improve the chance of success in the organization.

The main focus behind the development of management theory is the quest for good ways to make use of managerial means. Management theory evolves constantly with the continuous stream of new ideas that come from the attempts to transform theory into practice, and vice versa (Aguinaldo & Powell, 2002). Progression in management theory normal happen as key personnel discover great methods to accomplish the most important management responsibilities: planning, organiz-ing, leading, and controlling human and other managerial means. This paper will show how man-agement theory having to do with suitable management processes has emerge in modern times, and view the main aspects that have led to its prosperity.

FW Taylor advocated scientific management and Max Weber advocated bureaucracy, with whom do you agree and why? Which is more relevant in today’s business world.