The Theories And Complications Of International Relations

709 Words3 Pages
The international relations theory attempts to provide a conceptual model upon which are analyzed international relations , its implications and how you study and understand the participation of stakeholders and their influence in the international system . Each theory helps to understand the birth of International Relations as an independent disciplinary area within political science , and its deep changes and reflections until today. Each is reductive and essentialist to different degrees, respectively based on different sets of assumptions.

Theories of International Relations act like a pair of colored glasses, allowing the viewer to see only events relevant to each theory. An adherent of realism can completely ignore an event that a constructivist defines as crucial, and vice versa. The number and nature of the alleged facts by theory, it also determines its usefulness. The realism , parsimonious and essentialist theory is useful when reviewing historical actions (eg why X invaded to Y), but limited both in explaining systemic changes (like the end of the Cold War ). The liberalism , meanwhile, examines a wide range of conditions, and
…show more content…
This lack of recognition makes the way in which political issues are handled at the international level have a strong male bias. Classical notions of international relations and are associated with masculinity, such as the idea that the world is essentially anarchic and conflictive, have penetrated the creation of foreign policies of the countries and in the actions of some international organizations, such as NATO. This, according to some feminist critics, generates an international order that is exclusive and very limited vision for the vast range of issues that need attention in the international arena, such as migration and social
Get Access