The Theories And Theories Of Leadership

STATEMENT 1: THEORIES OF LEADERSHIP PROVIDE PRACTICAL ADVICE ON HOW TO BE AN EFFECTIVE LEADER. EVALUATE THIS STATEMENT WITH REFERENCE TO AT LEAST TWO THEORIES OR MODELS OF LEADERSHIP.

The trait leadership theory suggested by Ralph M. Stogdill, Trait theory is one of the early methodologies in leadership. Leadership trait theory suggests that leaders are innate rather than prepared. It places highlighting on the individual qualities of persons as signs of leadership success and with definite abilities that will make them shine in leadership parts. Such as cleverness, sense of charge, inventiveness and other values places them in the shoes of a good leader.

As was mentioned earlier, the trait theory contains highly subjective perspectives. It means that the perception of leadership traits is associated with the assessment of leadership. Barry et al (2003) conducted an

Leadership theory, or the scientific approach to understanding leadership, is a vast group of theories that try to explain what makes, or constitutes a great leader. There are many schools of thought on this subject and many pull from existing psychological theories, like Behavioral Theory, Developmental Theory, Personality Theory and Learning theory (Myers, 2014). There are three main leadership theories: trait theory, which suggests that some are born with certain traits that make them an effective leader, while behavioral theory focuses on how leader behave, while contingency theory addresses how the situation influences leadership.

Though the theories of leadership glorify factors, such as personal significance, timing, special skills, responsiveness, or power, as the qualities of a leader, I believe that neither of those factors are as essential as being personable. I believe being personable is the greatest determinant since a leadership position requires public speaking, either in the form of one-to-one conversations or to an audience. I believe that a leader should create an impression that will motivate and inspire others. Therefore, they should be able to create an impressive and enduring impression. Leaders should speak to others in a way that is respectful, friendly, and relatable. If they are unable to do so, then no matter how powerful or significant the individual, not a single person will follow, admire, or respect them.

My leadership philosophy is consists of multiple leadership theories. Leadership theories can be leader-centered or follower-centered. Leadership theories focus on the leader’s personality and skill abilities. The psychodynamic approach is most similar to my leadership style because of its focus on personality. My leadership style is directive and task oriented. There are certain weaknesses in my leadership style which I know I can improve on. By incorporating the knowledge I have gained through this course I plan on applying the contingency theory to refine my leadership skills. The path-goal theory’s main emphases is on the relationship between the leader and follower which can help influence your subordinates. As a follower, I feel the relationship between the follower and the leader is tremendously important in the work environment in order to be able to complete tasks efficiently which is described in the leader-member exchange theory. In this essay I will describe my leadership philosophy which is comprised of the contingency theory, the path-goal theory, the leader-member exchange theory, and the psychodynamic approach theory and present a plan of action to improve my leadership and motivation skills.

Trait theories were first of the four most common leadership theories. The foundation of trait theory is; leaders are born with the innate ability to lead. In essence, leadership traits are inherent in the genetic makeup of an individual and are natural, not learned predispositions. On the contrary, current research has found leadership traits to be external behaviors emerging from development of cognitive discipline and knowledge growth.

Trait theories were first of the four most common leadership theories. The foundation of trait theory is; leaders are born with the innate ability to lead. In essence, leadership traits are inherent in the genetic makeup of an individual and are natural, not learned predispositions. On the contrary, current research has found leadership traits to be external behaviors emerging from development of cognitive discipline and knowledge growth.

When it comes to leadership there are many different way to go about defining it, saying that, there is no set definition of leadership. The problem of defining leadership can be seen from two different fundamental difficulties (15). The first notion is that leadership is a multifaceted concept that is subjective to interpretation, such as everyone has their own understanding of what leadership is based off of experience and learning (15). Which makes it very difficult to set a specific definition that everyone agrees upon. The second notion is that leadership is defined and understood is strongly influenced by ones theoretic stance (15). Such as there are those individuals who view leadership as a set of characteristic or traits seen

Theories of leadership provide practical advice on how to be an effective leader. Evaluate this statement with reference to at least two theories or models of leadership.

In today’s world, leaders are not defined by age, race or gender. They can be a high school basketball coach, the shift supervisor at the local coffee shop, or even the President of the United States of America. In as many ways that leaders can vary by appearance and responsibility, there is also a variance in the ways that they lead. This case study aims to compare three of the more popular theories of leadership. These leadership theories are situational leadership, trait theory and transformational leadership.

Another leadership theory that I identified with was the directive leadership theory. A completely opposite of visionary leadership theory, directive leadership style requires the supervisor to set objectives for his or her staff and make sure they meet objectives their supervisor set. According to Shawn Grimsley of Study.com, the path-goal theory is needed understand the concept of the directive leadership theory.

Trait theories accept that people receive precise qualities and traits that make them larger suited to leadership. Trait theories frequently recognize particular personality or behavioral characteristics public by leaders. If particular traits are key features of association, next how do we clarify people who own those qualities but are not leaders? This question is one of the difficulties in employing trait theories to clarify leadership.

To begin with, I would like to share with you some compelling examples of leadership, to explain what drives my behavior in dealing with people, I will discuss the concept of leadership how drives strength in leadership reflection on my character. Some of the great leaders in time were poor and some of them never ever went to school. They were born with the leadership skills. For instance, the Prophet Mohammed, he made a change of peoples ' thoughts then who were worshipping stones and now they became worshipping Allah “God”. They influenced by his good manners, his way of teaching with Lord Words, as well as, his patience and perseverance on people’s harmful actions. I believe these factors made him succeed to lead billions until today.

This theory is based on the premise that there are certain personality characteristics that are essential for a person to possess in order to be a leader. The main emphasis is on what the person is in terms of a constellation of personality traits. This theory searches for that set of universal leadership traits that will assure success. Numerous traits have been suggested: courage, integrity, loyalty, charisma, ambition, intelligence, honesty, clairvoyance, persistence, arrogance, health, political skill, confidence and vision.