The Theory Of Leadership Theories

Leadership is an influential factor in the success and failure. If an organization is failing, look at the leader, not the economy; not the market; look at the leader. The movements and influence of a leader determines the fate of those under her or him. The importance of leadership cannot be underestimated. The importance of leadership has constantly been debated and a part argumentative discussion. There is no one approach to leadership, however leadership theories try to make sense of various approaches to leadership. James G. Clawson is considered an authority in leadership theories. His Level III leadership theory is about managing energy, first in leader, and then in those around the leader.

The leadership models/theories that will be demonstrated are skills-based leadership, situational leadership, and leader-member exchange theory.

Though the theories of leadership glorify factors, such as personal significance, timing, special skills, responsiveness, or power, as the qualities of a leader, I believe that neither of those factors are as essential as being personable. I believe being personable is the greatest determinant since a leadership position requires public speaking, either in the form of one-to-one conversations or to an audience. I believe that a leader should create an impression that will motivate and inspire others. Therefore, they should be able to create an impressive and enduring impression. Leaders should speak to others in a way that is respectful, friendly, and relatable. If they are unable to do so, then no matter how powerful or significant the individual, not a single person will follow, admire, or respect them.

The outcome of this constructive conservation was a list of 1,800 items describing various facets of leader behavior. Afterward, the different items were assigned, and a questionnaire was composed consisting of 150 questions for describing leader behaviors, the so-called “Leader Behavior Description Questionnaire (LBDQ)”, (p. 76).

During this course, the focus has been on leadership and the different theories of leadership. There are either eight to ten leadership theories, depending on the source. Those leadership theories describe different aspects of what it take to be a leader and the skills and traits of people who are considered leaders. There are two different sets of leadership theories. According to Cherry (2012), when it comes to leadership theories, “most can be classified as one of eight major types.” Those eight major types are called the “Great Man” Theories, Trait theories, Contingency Theories, Situational theories, Behavioral theories, Participative theories, Management theories, and Relationship theories. Those eight leadership theories are similar to the ten leadership theories discussed by Zigarelli. According to Zigarelli (2013), There are ten leadership styles that all have useful aspects to them, and the more that a person learns about all ten theories, they better equipped they will be to become a leader. The ten leadership theories are identical in some areas to the eight leadership theories, but there are some differences. The ten leadership theories are the Great Man Theory, The Trait Theory of Leadership, The Skills Theory of Leadership, The Situational Leadership Theory, The Contingency Theory, Transactional Leadership, Transformational Leadership, Leader-Member Exchange Theory, and the Servant Leadership Theory. After

You assign a new employee a task as you run off to a meeting, do your work or to take that precious lunch break. When you get back, you learn that this person has not completed what you have asked of him/her, not because they did not want to, but because they did not know how and did not ask for help. Because of this, time is wasted and now you have to actually do some work yourself. What would be a good way to minimize the likelihood of things like this happening in the future?

Leadership is a concept that is constantly discussed yet there is seldom agreement about what it is. Even though most agree leadership is crucial to success of any people, project or venture. People define leadership differently and often times misconstrue leadership with management. Leadership provides the vision and focuses on the people while management focuses on objectives and tasks. It is however valid that a budding leader may sometimes need to act as both a leader an as a manager whenever necessary.

Leadership has been an emerging topic, where over the last twenty to thirty years research has shown it to be of critical value. According to DeRue (2014), the depth and richness of existing literature has produced an array of important insights about leadership in organizations. While the development of leadership is not just about developing knowledge and skills, it is also about it is also about developing people’s motivation to lead, their awareness concerning the risks and rewards coupled with leadership, as well as their identity as leaders, and thought processes on what it means to participate in the a leadership process. With that being said, the servant leader approach places focus on leadership from the leaders point of view, emphasizing their attentiveness on the followers concerns, empowering them, all the while helping them to grow and develop through encouragement (Northouse, 2013).

Chapter sixteen discusses various leadership theories which can implemented by leaders to achieve success. The choice of leadership theory differs from leader to leader as they possess different vision and way of managing. A theory isn 't always perfect in itself, it is the endless effort of the leaders which makes the theory a perfect one. Two approaches of leadership that I prefer are Situational Leadership Theory and Servant Leadership Theory. Among many theories I prefer these two because I tend to practice those principles most of the time and I assume these are theories that I truly tend to continue in a long run.

Over the past several weeks in Fundamentals of Leadership, we, as graduate students, have invested time and research into studying more about our leadership style. There is an old Greek adage, know thyself. Through the culmination of self- assessments, leadership interviews and readings, we have developed a keener understanding of ourselves in the roles that we now have and in the positions that we will hold in the future.

This semester we have taken a greater look at the styles and understanding of leadership theories. Through our class readings, I have discovered the good and bad of leadership and management along with a clear understanding of the relationship between leaders and their followers. One thing that I found very interesting was the breakdown of the different types of followers and although I thought I had pretty good leadership skills I have gained a lot of knowledge to enhance my ability to lead.

In today’s world, leaders are not defined by age, race or gender. They can be a high school basketball coach, the shift supervisor at the local coffee shop, or even the President of the United States of America. In as many ways that leaders can vary by appearance and responsibility, there is also a variance in the ways that they lead. This case study aims to compare three of the more popular theories of leadership. These leadership theories are situational leadership, trait theory and transformational leadership.

The interest in the study of leadership has expanded over the past years. There are a great number of leadership theories, styles and models that have been presented to describe precisely why and how certain individuals become to be such great leaders (Northouse, 2013). People have often wondered the questions such as what accurately makes an exceptional leader as well as the certainty of personality traits that could make people better-fitted for leadership roles (Northouse, 2013). With the interest in leadership throughout history, there have recently been a number of leadership theories that has emerged (Northouse, 2013).

According to Bobby Clinton, leadership emergence theory can be stated in these terms: God develops a leader over a lifetime, and effective leaders will understand their ministry in terms of a lifetime perspective. That development is a function of the use of events and people to impress leadership lessons upon a leader (processing or shaping activities), time, and leader response (Clinton 2012, 171-173). Ultimately, processing items in critical life events such as ministry conflict provide opportunities to bring closure to recent experiences, to deepen ones relationship to God, to expand one 's perspectives to see new things, and to make decisions which will launch one into a new phase of development (Clinton 1992, 16). How we react in that crisis, our response patterns, determines the type of leaders we will become. Therefore leaders need to be prepared so they can evaluate process items with perspective and develop maturity to learn the lessons God intends.

To begin with, I would like to share with you some compelling examples of leadership, to explain what drives my behavior in dealing with people, I will discuss the concept of leadership how drives strength in leadership reflection on my character. Some of the great leaders in time were poor and some of them never ever went to school. They were born with the leadership skills. For instance, the Prophet Mohammed, he made a change of peoples ' thoughts then who were worshipping stones and now they became worshipping Allah “God”. They influenced by his good manners, his way of teaching with Lord Words, as well as, his patience and perseverance on people’s harmful actions. I believe these factors made him succeed to lead billions until today.