The Theory Of Leadership Theories

STATEMENT 1: THEORIES OF LEADERSHIP PROVIDE PRACTICAL ADVICE ON HOW TO BE AN EFFECTIVE LEADER. EVALUATE THIS STATEMENT WITH REFERENCE TO AT LEAST TWO THEORIES OR MODELS OF LEADERSHIP.

Leadership is an influential factor in the success and failure. If an organization is failing, look at the leader, not the economy; not the market; look at the leader. The movements and influence of a leader determines the fate of those under her or him. The importance of leadership cannot be underestimated. The importance of leadership has constantly been debated and a part argumentative discussion. There is no one approach to leadership, however leadership theories try to make sense of various approaches to leadership. James G. Clawson is considered an authority in leadership theories. His Level III leadership theory is about managing energy, first in leader, and then in those around the leader.

Theories of leadership provide practical advice on how to be an effective leader. Evaluate this statement with reference to at least two theories or models of leadership.

Leadership is a concept that is constantly discussed yet there is seldom agreement about what it is. Even though most agree leadership is crucial to success of any people, project or venture. People define leadership differently and often times misconstrue leadership with management. Leadership provides the vision and focuses on the people while management focuses on objectives and tasks. It is however valid that a budding leader may sometimes need to act as both a leader an as a manager whenever necessary.

Chapter sixteen discusses various leadership theories which can implemented by leaders to achieve success. The choice of leadership theory differs from leader to leader as they possess different vision and way of managing. A theory isn 't always perfect in itself, it is the endless effort of the leaders which makes the theory a perfect one. Two approaches of leadership that I prefer are Situational Leadership Theory and Servant Leadership Theory. Among many theories I prefer these two because I tend to practice those principles most of the time and I assume these are theories that I truly tend to continue in a long run.

Over the past several weeks in Fundamentals of Leadership, we, as graduate students, have invested time and research into studying more about our leadership style. There is an old Greek adage, know thyself. Through the culmination of self- assessments, leadership interviews and readings, we have developed a keener understanding of ourselves in the roles that we now have and in the positions that we will hold in the future.

I do not believe that there is such thing as a correct leadership theory, there I said it, I’ve been holding it in an jesus does it feel great to get it out. Haha what I do believe in is awesome people, people who treat other people great and treat themselves and their business, foundation or institution great now that’s what I believe in. So in the sake of great leaders I will be taking on prompt number two and constructing my own theory by using 3 examples from the book and 6 sources that I will cite properly in an MLA format.

During this course, the focus has been on leadership and the different theories of leadership. There are either eight to ten leadership theories, depending on the source. Those leadership theories describe different aspects of what it takes to be a leader and the skills and traits of people who are considered leaders. There are two different sets of leadership theories. According to Cherry (2012), when it comes to leadership theories, “most can be classified as one of eight major types.” Those eight major types are called the “Great Man” Theories, Trait theories, Contingency Theories, Situational theories, Behavioral theories, Participative theories, Management theories, and Relationship theories. Those eight leadership theories are similar to the ten leadership theories discussed by Zigarelli. According to Zigarelli (2013), There are ten leadership styles that all have useful aspects to them, and the more that a person learns about all ten theories, they better equipped they will be to become a leader. The ten leadership theories are identical in some areas to the eight leadership theories, but there are some differences. The ten leadership theories are the Great Man Theory, The Trait Theory of Leadership, The Skills Theory of Leadership, The Situational Leadership Theory, The Contingency Theory, Transactional Leadership, Transformational Leadership, Leader-Member Exchange Theory, and the Servant Leadership Theory. After

The concept of a class focused on studying theories of leadership is a novel idea to me. It is not surprising though; people only began to define leadership at the beginning of the 20th century, so it is a relatively young field (Northouse, 2016). Although I have always believed that leadership was an ability that could be developed and learned, to discuss leadership theory in a classroom without any actual application of the skills did not seem particularly effective. Especially for someone like myself who is generally a practical, hands-on learner, I was not sure what I could possibly gain. My initial thinking stems from the American education, where students are encouraged to be leaders without any explanation of what that might look

Qualities of the leader is an existence of essential signs or features in which he differs from other employees.

In today’s world, leaders are not defined by age, race or gender. They can be a high school basketball coach, the shift supervisor at the local coffee shop, or even the President of the United States of America. In as many ways that leaders can vary by appearance and responsibility, there is also a variance in the ways that they lead. This case study aims to compare three of the more popular theories of leadership. These leadership theories are situational leadership, trait theory and transformational leadership.

In workplace condition, there are numerous dynamics which may affects a manager’s leadership style. The most significant features which will affect the choice of leadership styles or leadership behavior in a workplace condition need to identify.

According to Bobby Clinton, leadership emergence theory can be stated in these terms: God develops a leader over a lifetime, and effective leaders will understand their ministry in terms of a lifetime perspective. That development is a function of the use of events and people to impress leadership lessons upon a leader (processing or shaping activities), time, and leader response (Clinton 2012, 171-173). Ultimately, processing items in critical life events such as ministry conflict provide opportunities to bring closure to recent experiences, to deepen ones relationship to God, to expand one 's perspectives to see new things, and to make decisions which will launch one into a new phase of development (Clinton 1992, 16). How we react in that crisis, our response patterns, determines the type of leaders we will become. Therefore leaders need to be prepared so they can evaluate process items with perspective and develop maturity to learn the lessons God intends.

I performed a self-evaluative test to find what kind of leader I am and found that by large I am a participative leader. I do agree with these test findings, as I feel each team member is equally important. I do not believe that any one person can have all the answers to everything, rather, that everyone should work together and come up with solutions. In regards to the other two leadership styles, I scored next highest in the delegate category and the least amount in the authoritative category. In this paper I will give a comprehensive overview of leadership styles and leadership management theories and how they relate to my style. Lastly, I will discuss my type of work environment, and three key actions or behaviors that I must demonstrate to be a successful leader.

-The theory does not consider or take into consideration the ways values affect the group dynamics.