The Theory Of Leadership Theory

It is believed leadership can be taught. There are many training facilities and different present organizations that offer leadership training for their employees. These training classes are directed by psychologists whom utilize self-report questionnaires to help one understand themselves which will then, in turn, help them learn to lead others. John Storey in Leadership in Organizations argues that “it is impossible to lead others without a deep understanding of oneself” (Storey, 2004, p.125). There are various theories in regards to leadership, but according to our textbook they can all be categorized into six theory approaches. The first one is

Leadership is complex and, comprises of many definitions and qualities (Grimm 2010). One definition of leadership is ‘a multifaceted process of identifying a goal, motivating other people to act, and providing support and motivation to achieve mutually negotiated goals’ (porter-O’Grady 2003). Back in 1939 Kurt Lewin researched to identify different styles of leadership. According to his research, there are three major styles of leadership. Authoritarian or autocratic, participative or democratic and delegative or laizzes-fair. These three styles remain influential today. According to educational leaders.govt.NZ, leadership is about empowering, transforming and working together to meet schools and 21st century (www.tki).There are many leadership theories and from leadership theories comes leadership styles. the educational leadership model according to www.educational leaders.govt.nz identifies four qualities that build a leader 's capability to enhance teaching and learning outcomes for the school: manaakitangi- leading with moral purpose, pono- having self-belief, ako- being a learner, awhinatanga -guiding and supporting.

Leadership theories in and of themselves carry negative and positives characteristics. Within the various theories lie strengths and weaknesses that when applied to complex problems can highlight each one respectively. As I examine a few theories, I will look at the strengths and weaknesses of each and determine when and with which situation would these theories best be utilized. Collective leadership or distributive leadership, and leader-member exchange are both theories that incorporate specific team or group mentalities.

Out of all the different leadership theories I learned about this semester I really feel that I best relate to transformational leadership and authentic leadership theories. During the development of my personal theory I found that these theories tended to list many similar traits, and values that aligned with my own. Additionally, both authentic and transformative theories place a significant amount of emphasis on the relationship between the leader and her/his followers. The success and influence of a leader comes not from herself but from her ability to create and invoke strong relationships with their followers. Given my character strengths of being understanding, upholding my sense of fairness, honesty and my strong sense of morals,

There are different leadership theories developed throughout the history. Most popular ones are trait theories, behavioral theories, contingency theories, and leader-member exchange (LMX) theory. The author of the post will briefly discuss two theories, Fiedler contingency theory and Leader-Member Exchange (LMX), and compare and contrast their strengths and weakness.

Foundational theories are the backbone of today’s application of leadership in all aspects of a global society. Understanding the characteristics that define successful leadership is not feasible due to application of leadership principles in different circumstances. This does not defray the premise that effective leadership cannot be learned. In fact, learning and understanding the many approaches to leadership allows an individual to internalize and effectively develop a leader’s mentality (Derecskei, 2016). In this section the four core theories on leadership and the tools used under each will be discussed.

Out of all the different leadership theories I learned about this semester I really feel that I best relate to transformational leadership and authentic leadership theories. During the development of my personal theory I found that these theories tended to list many similar traits, and values that aligned with my own. Additionally, both authentic and transformative theories place a significant amount of emphasis on the relationship between the leader and her/his followers. The success and influence of a leader comes not from herself but from her ability to create and invoke strong relationships with their followers. Given my character strengths of sociability, integrity, assertiveness, and my drive to connect to others on a deeper level, I value both the authentic and the transformative leadership theories.

There are a multitude of different leaderships theories and some of the current leadership theories model older version in history. To go over them all could sound a little redundant as many have similar concepts. I would like to discuss three contemporary leadership theories that have been most influential in my experience and what I would like to strive to become better at. The three theories are Servant, Authentic and Situational leadership. Not just one of these theories works best

There are a few different leadership approaches that were discussed in this course. The leadership approaches I’ll be discussing are the trait, skills, style, and the situational approaches, as well as two leadership theories which are contingency theory and the path-goal theory.

Chapter sixteen discusses various leadership theories which can implemented by leaders to achieve success. The choice of leadership theory differs from leader to leader as they possess different vision and way of managing. A theory isn 't always perfect in itself, it is the endless effort of the leaders which makes the theory a perfect one. Two approaches of leadership that I prefer are Situational Leadership Theory and Servant Leadership Theory. Among many theories I prefer these two because I tend to practice those principles most of the time and I assume these are theories that I truly tend to continue in a long run.

Cherry, K. (2011). Leadership Theories - 8 Major Leadership Theories. In About. Retrieved October 2, 2011, from http://psychology.about.com/od/leadership/p/leadtheories.htm

The Great Man Theory describes the leader as being born with the necessary characteristics to lead an organization ("Leadership Theories," n.d.). Trait Theory expanded on the Great Man Theory stating leaders who are born with the characteristics or traits to be a great leader will help them excel as leaders ("Leadership Theories," n.d.). Behavioral theories focus on the leader’s behaviors and not their characteristics ("Leadership Theories," n.d.). Contingency theories state leadership styles vary based on the environment or situation ("Leadership Theories," n.d.). Transactional leadership theories focus on the transaction between leaders and their followers ("Leadership Theories," n.d.). Transformational leadership theories focus on the relationship of the leader and their followers and how that relationship impacts the organization ("Leadership Theories," n.d.).

Leadership is a process whereby individual influences a group of individuals to achieve a common goal (Northouse, 2013, p. 5). So, to better understand the fundamental principles preceding leadership philosophy, we have to understand the theory of leadership development and its essential characteristics. The leadership theories that are greatest associated with my personal developmental plan are the theory of relationship and transformational leadership. The transformational leadership theory is allied with my personal development plan because it is also known as the transformational leadership model, which emphases on the influences that inspires both the leader and the followers. According to this theory, the main elements or fundamental base is created on vision, trust, power, authenticity, motivation, and communication.

-The theory does not consider or take into consideration the ways values affect the group dynamics.

Leadership theories are attempts to answer some of the question people have about leadership. These theories range from simple “armchair philosophies” about the personal characteristics and effect relationship between leaders and followers and situations.