The Theory Of Mechanical And Organic Solidarity And Anomie Essay

The movie “A Bug’s Life” shares the story of a colony of ants that are trapped in a vicious cycle of gathering food for the powerful grasshoppers year after year. The ants become wary of collecting food and soon realize a revolution is needed to free themselves from the grip of the grasshoppers. Throughout “A Bug’s Life”, a critical analysis of character interaction contributes to a greater understanding of the functionalist theory, conflict theory, and Marxism and how these sociological principles create a competitive society and inevitably lead to societal change.

Emile Durkheim, Karl Marx, and Max Weber are all important characters to be studied in the field of Sociology. Each one of these Sociological theorists, help in the separation of Sociology into its own field of study. The works of these three theorists is very complex and can be considered hard to understand but their intentions were not. They have their similarities along with just as many of their differences.

Disney’s Pixar film, A Bug’s Life, is much more than meets the eye. The film is not only an animated comedy; it holds deep sociological theory within its plot. Many of the major themes and concepts of the movie can be viewed through the lens of the famous theorist Karl Marx. Marx’s theory is famous for focusing on how society functions. In particular he concerns himself with how capitalism, the working class, and the revolutions create problems in our society. My paper will analyze how Marxian theory and concepts fit into major climactic scenes of the film.

The working class in this film are forced to endure agonising labour in extremely dangerous environments whilst the upper class, the ‘sons’ are free to live at their will. The dystopic setting of the ‘depths’ becomes evident through Lang’s use of symbolism when the dictator’s son, Freder, journeys to the depths and starts to see the workers being eaten up by the machines in the scene ‘Slaves of the Means of Production” (14.58-17.52). This symbolises the dystopic society in which workers do not have the right to be safe. This idea forms a contextual connection to the 1920’s Weimar Republic where there were two distinct classes, the conservative elite, who were free to live at their will, and the workers who were forced to endure labour with no guarantee for safety. Through the contextual connections of political reform and the shared perspectives of dystopian societies the quote “the object of power is power” is strongly supported by George Orwell’s ‘1984’ and Fritz Lang’s ‘Metropolis’.

A Visit from the Goon Squad is a relatively new literally masterpiece that won the Pulitzer Prize. As it is a new literary work, there has not been a lot of analysis done on it to date, in other words there is a gap in the literature and this essay will attempt to close some of that gap. Through Marxist ideologies, an article by Jeremy Gilbert and a book by Terry Eagleton, this essay will begin to dissect some of the broader topics from a few chapters in the novel as well as the connection it has with Marxism.

One a different level, the personification of the loss demonstrates it has a mind of its own that the speaker cannot control as he is forced to idle watch by. The complexity of the loss leads to the desire for the narrator to bring life back into something damaged beyond repair. The loss of the house and the loss the narrator feels switches creates a desire within the narrator to make use out of something terrible that has happened to him. The juxtaposition of harsh d sounds in “discarded or damaged” (20) paired with the positive and airy “lift” (21) reveals the large shift the narrator would have to make to achieve his dream. The specification of “even gone” (20) by the speaker indicates he recognizes the absurdity of his

The house’s efficiency and helpfulness seem to make it cold and emotionless and the fact that it lives on after its inhabitants have passed just proves how the house is only a machine that is unable to love, this house will always be a house but it will never be a home.

Karl Marx (1818-1883) and Émile Durkheim (1858-1917) were sociologists who both existed throughout similar time periods of the 19th and early 20th centuries, resulting in both Marx, and Durkheim to be concerned about similar effects and impacts among society (Appelrouth and Edles: 20, 77). Marx’s main focus was on class distinctions among the bourgeoisie and proletariat, forces and relations of production, capital, surplus value, alienation, labour theory of value, exploitation and class consciousness (Appelrouth and Edles: 20). Whereas Durkheim’s main focus was on social facts, social solidarity – mechanical solidarity and organic solidarity, anomie, collective conscience, ritual, symbol, and collective representations

It was in average condition. The interior is done in colors that remind you of Halloween, the yard is tiny and resembles a meadow. Also, its last occupants left in a hurry. Not that Lincoln’s father gave any mind to it, it was a home, and it was their home. And today, he woke up with his heart feeling as if it had stopped. “Lincoln, are you alright?” a voice slurred out, he was barley able to make out the words for a minute before realizing who was in his room. He didn’t have a big one, just a basic small one. The floor was made of dark, polished oak wood. The walls painted white, yet of course, it was peeling and tainted a slight grey. He sat up against his wooden headboard engraved with small flowers, meeting the eyes of his dear friend, Ralph Meaklim. He was a decent looking guy for their age and having to come from living as an orphan, yet, he was spoiled rotten. Ralph owned slick black hair that went down to his

A.) Mechanical Solidarity (Pg.103): Durkheim’s term for the unity (a shared consciousness) that people feel as a result of performing the same or similar tasks

Based on Page 14-15 in our text talking about conflict theory by Karl Marx, this documentary depicts the cruel reality of our society.The film continues to examine today’s industry by exploring the economic and legal powers large food companies have. This simply means by using power to gain control in a large proportion of the society. As we now the main point of conflict theory is inequality exists because those in control of a disproportionate share of society’s resources actively defend their advantages. According to sociology.com this theory is based on the masses that are not bound to society by their shared values, but by coercion at the hands of those in power. This perspective emphasizes social control, not consensus and conformity. Groups and individuals advance their own

The film ‘Fight Club’ follows, to some degree of accuracy, the archetypal paradigm of the apocalyptic guidelines discussed in English 3910. Specifically the movie mostly deals with the genre of the personal apocalypse. Thus, following suit in relation to such works as ‘Lancelot’, ‘The Violent Bear it away’ and ‘Apocalypse Now’. ‘Fight Club’, essentiality contains the basic premise of these works, that is the purging of one’s identity through extreme measures and crisis; to ultimately arrive at a personal revelation in the end.

Media publications are a great expression of human trends and ideas. Weather movies or music, they all have a societal impact and at least allude to trends of sociology theorists. This is abundantly true in the film V for vendetta. There is a preexisting novel which also made an impact in that culture and it followed the same trends, but the film is being used because of its greater relevance to the modern era of America. The film depicts a post-apocalyptic world that has symbolism and story lines that run with modern events. These depictions can be more readily understood within the scope of Max Weber’s sociological insight and theory more specifically about his understanding on the modern world and it bureaucratization.

The movie reflects how capitalism has controlled the lives of people causing them to buy stuff they don’t need. Durden gives great speeches expressing the hold society has on us. One of the best speeches is given towards the middle of the movie. Durden gathers around the crowd of men in fight club and says.

The novel and the movie versions of “Fight Club” has been the greatest success for Chuck Palahniuk, the author of the novel. When published in 1996, the novel inspired many people around the world in a way that they started seeing the world in a different way. Opening everyone’s eyes and showing them a side of America in which all men had an act to follow and where big-time companies carved every persons life, Chuck Palahniuk’s novel displays problems with the current view and role of males in society, and it displays how everyone lives as a part of a big system created by the ideology of consumerism and capitalism.