The Theory Of Science And Christian Belief

The age of the earth has been debated for centuries. Many people believe in evolution that it took billions of years for everything and everyone to form. Others believe that God created the earth in seven days and that the earth is young. Secular scientist and Christian scientist both use different methods for determining how old the earth is. For example, Secular scientist look and use the layers of rocks to help them, while Christian scientist uses the Bible and look at historical data from other cultures to help them. Doesn't looking at archeological data seem more accurate than looking at rocks? If the earth is truly billions of years old, then why is there little sediment on the sea floor? Or how can secular scientist explain finding soft tissue in a fossil if the earth is old? The most logical explanation is that the earth is young. Many people believe something just because people say that it is true, sometimes it is good to investigate for yourself and see if it is good for you.

Founded by Jesus Christ over 2000 years ago, Christianity has been a highly influential instrument in the play out of history, but today Christianity does not hold the authority it once had. Christianity is a religion based on the personal and teachings of Jesus Christ and the golden rule “Love one another as I have loved you”, or its beliefs and practices. Chrisitanity once held complete dominance over every aspect of society including politics and its advocates, but because of the developments in science and technology Christianity’s control disconnected from its audience the constant changing the world’s view on religion, it not longer does. The Scientific Revolution led by Galileo, Newton and Darwin is one to hold liable for the tip of

Within philosophy, there has long been a question about the relationship between science and religion. These two systems of human experience have undoubtedly had a lot of influence in the course of mankind’s development. The philosopher Ian Barbour created a taxonomy regarding science and religion that has become widely influential. His taxonomy postulates that there are four ways in which science and religion are thought to interact. The four categories are: conflict, independence, dialogue, and integration. By using articles from a select few philosophers, theologians, and scientists, it is clear to see the ways in which these two systems of human experience are categorized in the four categories presented by Ian barbour. However, it will be apparent that the category of conflict may be seen as the most dominant in regard to the interaction between science and religion.

Similar in certain respects to deism, theistic evolutionteaches that God began the creative process by bringing the first organism to life.

Scientific Naturalism and Christianity are possibly the two most contradictory worldviews that are in our culture today. They are also the two most difficult to understand by one another. There is very little about these two worldviews that they have in common. They are a vast amount of ideas and beliefs held by adherents of each that are different. In order for these two worldviews to successfully co-exist in society, it is important to understand, accept, and learn from each one.

“In the beginning was the big bang,”[i] writes John Polkinghorne, a physicist turned theologian. As the reader follows through the remainder of his cosmic creation story, the reader is intrigued at how mystical and religious the story sounds. “The space boiled, in the rapid expansion of the inflation era, blowing the universe apart with incredible rapidity in the much less than 10-30 seconds that it lasted. . . . The world suddenly became transparent and a universal sea of radiation was left to continue cooling on its own . . .”[ii] Then, the story unfolds to tell of the creation of hydrogen and helium and the creation of stars. The death of stars follow, which

Recently, Pope Francis has modernized the Roman Catholic Church by urging followers to support scientists in preserving our environment. Pope Francis has drawn parallels between “the scientific and Christian communities, who are witnessing the convergence of their distinct approaches to reality in the shared goal of protecting our common home, threatened as it is by ecological collapse and consequent increase of poverty and social exclusion” (Pope Francis). As the contemporary world faces new problems, like climate change, Roman Catholic Christianity has supported the need for science as a means to preserve the Earth and guard humanity.

Humanity’s most baffling affliction and puzzlement must be, to some degree, our and our environment’s origin. To the secularist it seems there are two possibilities for the beginning of mankind: The Big Bang, and Evolution. However, Christianity supplies one definite supposition: a universe created by an omnipotent ruler, who was never Himself created, but rather resides in eternity. [1] Human minds may be tempted to sway to the ‘comfort’ of believing in a life to which they glorify themselves and serve themselves only. Our conceptions of ethical code rely on our discernment of creation and the beginning of space and time. As such, if divine creation is properly chosen as valid by an individual, as Christianity provides, there is a God whom

Appreciating the fundamental differences between these substances, creationists allege each requires a different derivation, contending God is the efficient cause of the soul, while the biological aspects of an individual originate from a common physical nature. Regarding the creation of Adam (cf. Genesis 2:7) as the archetype, creationists maintain God must coalesce physical and immaterial constituents to produce human beings, concluding this model best accounts for passages indicating God’s active involvement in procreative processes (cf. Isiah 42:5; Zechariah 12:1; Numbers

Christianity is similar to Christian Science in many ways, but it’s also very different. By describing Christianity, by describing Christian Science and eventually comparing them, you will see the similarities and differences. These are two popular religions and many people follow them around the world. Christianity is one of the Abrahamic faiths, Christians believe in one God and that Jesus is his son who came down to earth to save them.

One might ask, what is theistic evolution? The answer might not be as simple as it would seem. Theistic Evolution takes on many different aspects in ones’ life and can also lead one astray from the true joy of what God has in store for a persons’ life. To define theistic evolution one would have to go back and reveal what the belief actually is. It has been said that if one were to take the Bible literally, then that person would be a fool. Those of us who believe in God as creator and author of all that exist must be those fools they speak of and proud of it.

Religion beliefs play an important role in the life of many individuals and way the religion is founded as well as what is their belief is important. Christian Scientist is a religion founded by a woman and is characterized by a unique belief and overview about the human way of healing. What makes this religion to be unique it is free of any type of discrimination as well as the way it’s started.

“Does Science Make the Belief in God Obsolete?” by Kenneth Miller and Christopher Hitchens debate with no date of the discussion.

“That’s because new evidence comes into the light all the time, Miss. Singer.” Mr. McLaren said in a tizzy.

Since the dawn of mankind religion has been one of the most significant elements of a society’s social and cultural beliefs and actions. However, this trend has declined due to the general increase in knowledge regarding our the natural sciences. Where we had previously attributed something that we didn’t understand to the working of a higher power, is now replaced by a simple explanation offered by natural sciences. While advocates of Religion may question Natural Sciences by stating that they are based on assumptions, it is important to note the Natural Sciences are based on theories and principles which can be proven using mathematical equations and formulas. Faith however contrasts from the easily visible feasibility of data