The Theory Of Socialism As An Implementable System

Socialism in America has progressed substantially and is not bettering The United States. Socialism is a political theory of social organization that advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole. In much lighter terms socialism is where a government owns and runs everything in the country to, in theory, better the nation for the people. To increase the growth and help the economy in America the people need to learn what socialism is, learn why socialism does not benefit America, limit the federal government’s power, and look at statistics of the poor people in America.

In Eric Foner historiographical essay “ Why is there no socialism in the United States “ he establishes different schools of thought to elaborate why it seems that the U.S. is exceptional in contrast to Europe in terms of Socialism. These four schools of thought focus on social, ideological, political, economic and cultural distinctions , that scholars believe makes the U.S. unique in contrast to Europe in terms of Socialism.

The term capitalism is an economic system where the people in the capitalistic economy own and operate the majority of businesses. A capitalistic economy uses the method of laissez-faire, which derives from Adam Smith, and means that there is a limited role of the government in the economy (Pride 14).

Quotes like Winston Churchill’s have become part of the political rhetoric when leaders discuss the idea of socialism. In current events you can see the exact same argumentation being used against legislation such as the Affordable Health Care Act. Conservative talking heads such as Bill O’Reilly equate it to socialism because, as Mr. O’Reilly says himself, “[i]n order to provide for the have nots, the far left wants the federal government to seize the assets of solvent Americans. That’s what ObamaCare [the Affordable Health Care Act] is all about — taking from those who can afford health care to provide for those who cannot” (O’Reilly). This simplification of socialism does not do justice to the actual paradigm itself. Instead, in this paper I will try to refute our current idea of socialism because of a lack of understanding. The explanations and descriptions by Michael W. Doyle in his chapters on Marxist and Leninist socialism paints a picture that allows one to see how socialism could be beneficial to the common man while also critiquing the negative myths held by modern society.

In the video “The failure of Socialism” Mr. Friedman explained how bad schools have gotten. Teens in some schools are forced to go through metal detectors as policemen are watching. Taxpayers are not happy with this education because it is very expensive. They have to pay for the policemen to be there and to buy the metal detectors. Even though there is so much money spent on these schools they have ripped books, broken windows and unhappy teachers. The parents feel trapped because there is nothing they can do to help their children get a better education. The system is centralized with the professional educators deciding what shall be taught, who will teach, and what children go to which school.

Three different types of economic systems used by governments are Communism, Capitalism, and Socialism. Each type of system is unique in different ways. Each has distinct aspects that make it what it is. In communism, the government runs everything and there are no social classes. The government in capitalism doesn’t interfere with any businesses and lets the citizens own and operate them. Socialism is basically a mixture of the two economic systems. The government runs certain businesses, but citizens run the rest. The three economic systems are different in the way they run things and regulate things.

The idea that capitalism allows for the most freedom out of any political structure has been long perpetuated by proponents of capitalism. The thinkers in favor of capitalism, according to socialist thinkers, misinterpret what it means for a person to be truly free in a society, and capitalism cannot achieve that goal of making everyone truly free. Cohen believes that socialism not only is more attractive, morally, but also less constraining on liberty than the capitalist theorists believe because capitalism forces the proletariat to “sell their labor power” (Cohen, The Structure of Proletarian Unfreedom, 3). Cohen’s explains why socialism is morally acceptable as a theory of government through the example of the camping trip thought experiment, where the principles of community and egalitarianism are brought out. In this essay I will explore how Cohen forms these arguments, and then form counter arguments from a capitalist standpoint to try to derail his arguments.

In order to discuss the different ways in which economists considered societies could resolve the economic calculation problem and the implications of the economic calculation debate it is important to consider different view points of influential economists from all over the world.

Back in the 1800s was the start of the Economic Systems, communism, capitalism and the best one socialism.Socialism is the best because the care they have for one another. It helps everyone stand on their feet once they hit rock bottom. {Thesis Statement}: Socialism is the best of the three economic systems because of the equality, equal opportunities, and the communal care of the individual as we believe in here at St. Ursula Academy.

According to Cohen, economic systems operating on the basis of generosity are not feasible. Production is driven by greed.

Sociologist Views on the Means and Ends of Socialism Socialism is a very broad ideology, encompassing many different ideas and viewpoints. Different socialists have disagreed on both the ways in which they believe socialism should be achieved and implemented, and on what exactly it is that they want to achieve. The two main viewpoints I am going to look at in terms of the means of achieving socialism are revolutionary socialism and evolutionary socialism, and in terms of the aims of different socialists I am going to discuss Marxism, including orthodox communism, and also social democracy and the 'third way'. Because socialism tends to have an oppositional character, and be seen as a force

As mentions before socialism is the doctrine that espouses public ownership or control of a major means of production. It aims to achieve an equitable and efficient distribution of social goods and greater economic planning then exist under capitalism. Although the central concerns of socialism appears to be economic its ramifications extend to the moral, social and political realms, in fact together with nationalism, it is the leading ideological and political movement of the 20th century.

Today, more than ever, there is great debate over politics and which economic system works the best. How needs and wants should be allocated, and who should do the allocating, is one of the most highly debated topics in our current society. Be it communist dictators defending a command economy, free market conservatives defending a market economy, or European liberals defending socialism, everyone has an opinion. While all systems have flaws and merits, it must be decided which system is the best for all citizens. When looking at both the financial well being of all citizens, it is clear that market economies fall short on ensuring that the basic needs of all citizens are met. If one looks at liberty and individual freedom, it is evident

The benefits of communism have been debated for centuries. The underlining principle in communism is altruism. Benjamin Cardozo explains why altruism and communism will never be successful in reality. In Cardozo’s essay “The Altruist in Politics”, he explains that socialism will never work due to the fact it relies on altruism; although his argument is a strong one in the sense that he is passionate about his opinion and provides supporting evidence, it is problematic because of the false claims and never fully explaining why people are drawn to socialism if it is deficient.

In "Thinking for the Sake of Global Faithfulness", Thabiti Anyabwile, reminds us that we are called to be thinking people As Christians, he says, “we are called to love the Lord our God with all our mind, all our intellect, in the cause of being faithful to God and enjoying Him forever” (2011, p. 82). In considering an alternate worldview, such as socialism, careful mindfulness should be applied. It must be done with logic and, as good Christians, with heart. Dr. James Henderson would agree with this, as he says we must be “humble and redemptive” in evaluating a worldview. (Henderson, 2015) In this paper, I will evaluate socialism as theory versus praxis with humility and a redemptive Christian worldview perspective and, in so doing; expose the true fundamentals of socialism as nothing more than the very elitism and totalitarianism it sets out to eradicate.