The Theory Of Transformational Leadership Perspective And Parenting Essay

It has come to notice that the theory of transformational leadership is relatively a primitive concept that did not emerge until the recent century. Nevertheless, the characteristics attributed to transformational leadership style have existed and come under

The traditional concept of a leader, as being the directing chief at the top of a hierarchy, is now considered to be inadequate to truly lead a modern organisation. Leadership is concerned with people and so anyone, and indeed everybody, has the potential to demonstrate leadership qualities and behaviours.

The principal aspects of leadership are oft debated; to attempt to define what leadership is would most certainly result in broad and varied definitions dependent on who is queried. Nonetheless, in the preeminent

Transformational leadership, also known as charismatic leadership, is based upon transforming the followers into independent and confident workers. These leaders not only want the best for their followers, but they also portray themselves in a positive selfless way. Transformational leadership is one of the most popular approaches to leadership (Northouse, 2013). Throughout this informative research paper, I am going to explain what transformational leadership is, the different theories behind it, the goals, factors, strengths, and weaknesses.

Transformational leadership theory is defined as specific behaviors that are utilized by leaders in their interaction with followers that have a lasting effect (Yukl, 1999).  According to Harms and Credé (2010), these behaviors reflect a mentor who motivates the followers to learn, succeed, and develop as individuals. Additionally, they state that the leader cultivates a trusting environment, challenges their followers, displays consideration, charisma and the ability to spark intellectual stimulation (Harms & Credé, 2010; Yukl, 1999).

During the past three decades, transformational leadership has helped to transform the workforce. The need for this type of inspirational style was recognized and explored in an original work called Leadership by James Macgregor Burns (1978). Burns believed that transformational leadership was a collaborative process that served to raise the morals and motivations of everyone involved (Leadership, 1978, 19). This type of leader works to inspire others with a goal or plan for the future. According the Marquis and Huston (2015) one of the key aspects of this style is the ability to empower others

While there is no key definition of leadership, we have learned that the outcome of a good leader is to influence a group or team in achieving the organisations objective. Nevertheless, it is essential that we are first able to distinguish between leadership and management. Management is primarily concerned with the allocation and controlling of resources including people, and leadership is the ability to inspire people to achieve an outcome. General David Morrison, who has had an influenced on me as an ADF

Transformational leadership theory provides a solid foundation to address complex matters related to leaders and organizational leadership. As a reliable theoretical approach (Bass & Riggio, 2010; Judge & Piccolo, 2004), the theory’s historical and current applications in the workplace provide decades of support based on successful development outcomes of leaders and followers (Antonakis, Avolio & Sivasubramaniam, 2003; Bass, 1999; Bass 1997; Hatula, 2006; Hernandez, Long, & Sitkin, 2014; Mao & Chang, 2012; Malik, Javed, & Hanssan, 2017). One of the originating authorities of transformational leadership co-created the Multiple Leadership Questionnaire to quantitatively assess TL behavioral dimensions from multiple perspectives of leaders and followers (Bass, & Avolio,

Transformational leadership is defined “as a process where ‘leaders and their followers raise one another to higher levels of morality and motivation’” (Transformational leadership, n.d., para. 6). “Transformational leaders transform followers by creating changes in their goals, values, needs, beliefs, and aspirations” (Kreitner & Kinicki, 2013, p. 481). Our text gives us four types of transformational leadership behaviors: inspirational motivation, idealized influence, individualized consideration, and intellectual stimulation.

Leadership has been studied extensively and many varying definitions exist. Hughes, Ginnett and Curphy (2015, p.4) review many of these definitions and consequently describe leadership as ‘the process of influencing an organised group towards its goals’. Leadership involves the interplay of a range of different factors, not least the leader themselves, the followers and the situation. For

The word leadership can mean different things to different individuals. It brings variety of images to our minds as well. It can be from a political leader like Hamid Karzai or Obama, an inspirational person like Ahmad Shah Massoud, Nelson Mandela, Gandhi, or Martin Luther King, an executive like Steve Jobs and for some people it can be someone like Osama Bin Laden, one determined “leader”, who was able to successfully encourage hundreds of his followers to sacrifice their lives. For me Leadership is open-ended as it is so broadly used, but I perceive a leader someone who is a role model in any field and can successfully take the followers to achieve the objectives they ultimately pursue.

Since the early 1980s, there has been an explosion of interest on transformational leadership among scholars and managers. It is shown with evidence that the desire and effectiveness of transformational leadership style are universal (Den Hartog, et al., 1999, and Bass, et al. 2006). This leadership style, as its name implies, is a process which tends to change and transform individuals (Northouse, 2004). To help followers grow and develop into leaders, transformational leaders respond to individual followers’ needs and empower them (Bass, et al. 2006). It is also concerned with emotions, values, ethics, standards, and long-term goals

In an attempt to revisit my personal view of leadership, I will first review what fine points are of a leader that led me to define it as I did. My original definition identified leadership that “Scholars agree that there is no one definition of leadership and it remains a complex concept.” Further internet searches drummed up a plethora of slogans with different meanings and words of influence. This all was simply a bumper wall to stay in and fall between concepts, to no avail of a defined meaning of leadership. Without a concreate explanation into a definition of leadership that one can apply to effectively lead followers, one can only look at traits and concepts to rationalize within

Transformational Leadership Theory was introduced in 1978 by political sociologist James Mac Gregor Burns and expanded by industrial psychologist Dr. Bernard Bass. In this theory, Burns differentiated two styles of leadership: transformational leadership and transactional leadership. In transformational leadership, it is a process where both the leaders and the followers elevate motivation and morality. The transformational leaders pay attention to the needs and motives of followers and help them achieve their fullest potential. They influence their followers’ behaviors by appealing to the ideas and values and enhance the followers’ commitment to their vision. transformational leaders exhibit behaviors which include idealized influence wherein the leader serves as the role model for followers; inspirational motivation – leader inspires and motivates followers representing the leader’s charisma; individualized consideration- leader displays concerns for the needs and feelings of others which brings out the bringing out the follower’s best efforts and; and intellectual stimulation – the leader challenges followers to be creative and innovative. In transactional leadership, leader focuses on reward and punishment to achieve compliance from followers.

Over the years, a great deal of time, and research has been dedicate to the study of leadership. Even with extensive data on the topic, many still disagree on what leadership really means. Hence, leadership is a word that has many different meanings and different researched theories associated with it. On a basic level, leadership involves having and establishing a clear vision, sharing that vision with followers, respecting followers, and leading an organization with excellence while ensuring that everyone is part of the team. Leadership is also a method by which a leader uses his or her influence towards getting a group of followers to take ownership or buy into a vision.