The Threat Of Nuclear Weapons

Since the invention of nuclear weapons, they have presented the world with a significant danger, one that was shown in reality during the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. However, nuclear weapons have not only served in combat, but they have also played a role in keeping the world peaceful by the concept of deterrence. The usage of nuclear weapons would lead to mutual destruction and during the Cold War, nuclear weapons were necessary to maintain international security, as a means of deterrence. However, by the end of the Cold War, reliance on nuclear weapons for maintaining peace became increasingly difficult and less effective (Shultz, et. al, 2007). The development of technology has also provided increasing opportunities for states

Be it resolved that no country has the right to possess nuclear weapons. Nuclear weapons damage the environment greatly. The damage can be long lasting. One may argue that the damage to the environment can be justified by the fact that they can end wars quickly and reduce the number of deaths, but when they are used to end wars quickly, they will still kill many civilians indiscriminately. Radiation can kill many innocent people. However, the people most likely to be harmed by the radiation are the enemy country’s people, so therefore they are not innocent. But many civilians who die from radiation may not agree with what their government is doing and just because they live in an enemy country, doesn’t mean they are enemies or pose any

enemies to scare them into not continuing the battles that they are taking place in. They rhetorically strategized to scare the enemies into thinking that they were not bluffing and would use the weapons if the task presented itself. Bush even said that even if matters did go worse that he still most likely would not have used the nuclear weapons that he possessed. Also the statement made that if a president looks at using nuclear weapons lightly that it should be an embarrassment to them shows that even when they threaten using these weapons they are most likely bluffing. It appears that as time goes by people do not want nuclear weapons around especially our president. He also sees the huge damage that it can cause and is also trying to make it impossible for Iran to obtain these weapons as he is also working on trying to remove our nuclear weapons from Europe and other parts to not have the option of obtaining nuclear weapons in the future. This matter is super important for Americans to know about because nuclear weapons can be very catastrophic if they are used, especially by an enemy to the United States. The questions that need to be asked are is there ever going to be an end to nuclear weapons? Will we ever find the peace and security that Bush talks about? Will there

The Cold War was a frightening time for everyone involved, with the threat of nuclear destruction constantly looming over the lives of American and Soviet citizens alike. Since the Cold War ended in 1991, the immediate concern over nuclear war has definitely dwindled, though not vanished. More recently, concern has risen over the few more sporadic and antagonistic countries (mostly North Korea), that do have nuclear weapons. Where the Cold War brought constant tension, the modern nuclear menace brings a constant uncertainty over which small power (or potentially large one) may decide to actually use their nuclear bombs for gain or posturing. Nuclear war was without a doubt a much closer and much more direct fear during the Cold War, but today

You can imagine if one day terrorists access nuclear weapons, it will be an easier job for them to kill people. They could immediately destroy a city within a few minutes whenever they wish. The world wouldn’t feel safe. For example, look at what ISIL is doing to the world. The Paris attack, Brussels Airport attack, and the St Peters-burg subway station attack are some attacks that have been designed by ISIL. Now imagine if they had nuclear weapons, who would feel safe at home? Europeans? Asians? Or Americans?

In the twenty-first century the threat of nuclear war is still prominent but instead of the U.S.S.R the threat is now centralized in the Middle East and North Korea. So instead of building more bombs, as we did in the age of the red scare, we are now disarming them according to Sharon Squassoni the Director and Senior Fellow of the Proliferation Prevention Program . But problems in the middle east and with North Korea have caused us to keep a larger quantity on stand by. The United States is taking preventative

Nuclear weaponry has quite an extensive past. These weapons of mass destruction were introduced in World War 2 with the bombings of two major cities in Japan as a method to end the war. Then, in the 1960s, these WMD’s acted as a key part of the Cuban Crisis, which almost led to an entire war between the Soviet Union and America. Recently, the militaristic country of North Korea has started displaying threats to the United States, once again with nukes. This recent event (that’s still happening), along with past occurrences once again makes the world fear for its own life.

The Russian nuclear model, SS-18, and the U.S. MX models have the capabilities to cause more destruction than all the munitions used in World War II (A.G. Arbatove/ Belous, V.S./ Pikaev, A.A./ Baranovsky, V.G). As devastating as that may be to know, these models make up but a small portion of the Russian and United States' nuclear arsenals. These weapons as well as others are constantly maintained on a high alert status, creating more ground for an accidental exchange of "massive nuclear strikes". The dangers of nuclear escalation are real threats, threats that don't need a serious situation to occur. Today, several states have made progress in their attainment of nuclear arsenals. These activities are an inevitable result of the current nuclear position of several countries including the United States. The reasoning behind it all is the fact that possession of nuclear weapons by some states stimulates other nations to obtain them, so as to avoid becoming inferior or open to attack from any other country. The philosophy of the modern day

“There are armed adversaries of the US with nuclear weapons, including Russia, China and North Korea, with Iran now projected to have sufficient nuclear material for a weapon as early as 2014” ( Huessy, 2013, para. 9). This really emphasizes that the while the threat of terrorist groups using a nuclear weapon may not be probable, other countries are clearly very interested in them. “…North Korea announced in 2003 that it was building a bomb…” (New Internationalist, 2008, para. 19). So the threat of the countries using a nuclear bomb appears to be much more likely than that of a terrorist groups, even though a terrorist group has tried to acquire them, as the “…apocalyptic nature…” of a nuclear device appeals to extremists (IHS.Com, 2005, para. 14). Between 1993 and 2008, there have been 421 incidents of either theft of loss of radioactive or nuclear materials, and 2 terrorist groups

First, a nuclear bomb is extremely dangerous, which is why countries like U.S.S.R (Russia) or the United State didn’t use the bomb on each other during the Cold War. If the United States did not have that weapon during the Cold War, the country would not cease to exist. Second, the fear that the bomb creates protecting countries like: United States, Russia, United Kingdom, and six more not to use it on each other. Being able to hold such power proves why smaller countries do not invade or fight on the lands of the country that holds that power. In American history, there hasn’t been a war pertaining with an invasion to the country. Meaning that other countries are afraid of the power that America holds. Lastly, a powerful supply of power for many items. As the people can see, there are nuclear power plants across the world. The plants supply nearby cities, towns, and etc. with power to run the daily things in life. A nuclear power source isn’t just used to power civilian lives, there are some in military vehicles. The military uses the power to run a ginormous ship called an “aircraft carrier”. The nuclear source can make the ship last for an estimated time of thirty years without having to station. So nuclear power isn’t just a bad item that was developed. Nuclear power helps out a tremendous amount with supplying power to many things in the world and

It is argued that the most difficult segment for the creation of a nuclear device is the acquisition of the material. Proliferation of fissile material is a direct contributor to this particular segment that proves so challenging adding to the already daunting task of preventing nuclear terrorism. If the world is truly serious about preventing nuclear terrorism, parallel efforts should include halting the production of fissile material and an eventual eradication of existing stockpiles. An FMCT would show that internationally the world is committed to a human existence absent of nuclear weapons and further produce multilateral confidence building measures and declarations moving

The world has slowly been transforming into a hostile environment, especially with the growing threat of nuclear attacks. To create a foundation for the understanding of the global issue, one must comprehend that nuclear proliferation is the spreading of nuclear research, materials, and weapons to Non-Nuclear Weapons States. Many world leaders have come to the conclusion that nuclear weapons will lead to unavoidable tensions and conflicts. As a result, countries signed the non-nuclear proliferation treaty in 1968, which came into force in 1970 (“Nuclear Weapons Timeline”). One of the countries that luckily took charge in the movement, was the United States. From the signing of the treaty to present day, the U.S. has strongly opposed nuclear

The historian Spencer Weart notes "You say 'nuclear bomb ' and everybody immediately thinks of the end of the world" The escalation of nuclear proliferation in and around the world, especially in the Middle East has led to the fear of nuclear war in the near future. Many countries built nuclear weapons because it felt insecure from the major nuclear states or from their neighbors conventional military or nuclear capabilities. This is the situation with China, India and Pakistan. Many other reasons encourage countries to seek nuclear weapons, but the main reason for acquiring nuclear weapons is the deterrence against any external threat and prevention external offensive that might lead to war. Nuclear weapons make such countries feel more secure, nuclear weapons can prevent war because countries will have the ability to deter any external aggression. At the same time, there is no guarantee that acquiring nuclear weapons may lead to nuclear war.

Nuclear weapons are the most dangerous weapons on earth. One can demolish a whole city, potentially killing millions, and exposed the natural environment and lives of future generations through its long-term catastrophic effects. According to the UNODA- United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs (2011), “Although nuclear weapons have only been used twice in warfare- in the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945-about 22,000 reportedly remains in our world today and there have been over 2,000 nuclear tests conducted to date.” Nuclear weapons have been viewed as a threat to peace by world leaders. There have been debates of whether to let Iran and North Korea acquire nuclear weapons, leaders all around the world along with Liberals believe that it is a threat to peace and should limit the spread whereas neo realist have another belief that nuclear weapon can make the world a peaceful place. Because states would fear to attack each other. For example the Cuban missile crisis in 1962 and cold war- there were only threats and war did not happen because of nuclear deterrence. The Cuban missile crisis has frequently been portrayed as the only time where the world stood in the point of nuclear war between the superpowers. This is an example of how nuclear weapons were used to threaten the rival. Another examples would be that of India and Pakistan before they acquire nuclear weapon , they fought three bloody wars after having their independence but since 1998, after acquiring

Imagine a weapon that can kill 120,000 people in a blink of an eye. A weapon that can produce power of over 50 megatons of TNT. A weapon that not only the impact of it hitting the ground is dangerous but the aftermath of the weapon is just as deadly. And if that’s not enough to make you on edge, what if I told you that this weapon can be detonated from multiple different countries in just a few minutes if they feel like it. Now are you concerned? Well first let’s figure out how and who has this control before we answer if this weapon is a problem. Nuclear energy is the energy that holds neutrons and protons together in the nucleus of an atom. This energy is an effective way that can result in the production of electricity. Whenever one of these physical reactions take place it engenders a slight loss in mass, however this small loss of mass generates a lot of heat energy. This is the same principles that Albert Einstein explained with his famous equation, E=mc2. Nuclear energy, or more specifically military nuclear energy is a “super power” or very special powerful weapon that is seen as really dangerous or defensive in the eyes of the opposing country. How dangerous? Dangerous to the point that an average regular sized nuclear weapon that detonates over a city would burn away 40 to 65 square miles in the blink of an eye. some countries have the privilege or curse of owning nuclear weapons. Some of these countries include: The United States, Russia, The United Kingdom,