The Three Year Planning Will Include A Swoc / T Analysis

“School trains children to be employees and consumers; teach your own to be leaders and adventurers.  School trains children to obey reflexively; teach your own to think critically and independently” (Gatto 670).  In the present day school system, students are becoming more of products of an institutionalized school system

The socio-culture of targeted audience also impacting the company. Alcohol is serve on this establishment; clients over 21 is the target market. The BARbershop is following cultures and values according to the needs of its clients. Its services represent different cultures, attracting clients from different societies. It offers a multicultural service, giving priority to the values of integrity to obtain the full support of its clients. The BARbershop has essential interaction within the community, it

In the recent times, one of the hottest topic concerning education has been the standardizing of the curriculum. Standardized curriculum chiefly limits a student’s ability to acquire a higher level of knowledge, since it delivers average education to every student. In the article by Taylor Gatto, he discusses how the school has become a way of producing average individuals. In the article, the author quotes a passage from The American Mercury which states, “The aim… is simply to reduce as many individuals as possible to the same safe level, breed and train a standardized citizenry, to put down dissent and originality” (Gatto pg). I believe, for students to truly learn, they must be challenged through their education in some way. For example,

| |firm, all employees are |laws, and regulations are |opting to become |solid reputation is |instability plague |

Instead of coming together to create a truly democratic society that supports the whole we are caught up in serving first our own interests followed by the interests of the system that has allowed us to succeed. How is it possible that the people making the decisions can look at the state of our education system and blame the teachers for failing when they are also the ones providing the strict standards that serve to perpetuate the current hegemonic society we live in? I do think that there are good parts of having certain standards for education – all students should know how to read and write, everyone should have a basic understanding of mathematical concepts and history – but I think by micromanaging classrooms across the country, teachers are prevented from doing their job of teaching students and instead being tasked with “filling up the knowledge bank” with information deemed important by individuals and groups who have little to no connection to actual classrooms. The main point of this chapter was to shine a light on the negatives of the traditional education system and explain the educational philosophy aimed at combating the perpetuation of such

The practice of caring for the individual needs of each student should transform schools and society. The transformation is dependent on the market reaction to the personalized learning and care shown to students. As schools moved to an industrial model where bigger, impersonal, standardized learning became the norm, student’s needs became secondary. Kittay (2011) argues that all people have a need for dependency for care from others. Schools are built to provide care, but often fall under the category of being an institution. The impersonal nature of institutional schools has led to larger buildings, higher classes sizes, and curriculum geared for testing. This is not just a phenomenon in public schools where No Child Left Behind has left schools adjusting the curriculum to meet standards for continued funding. Standardization has also become wide spread within the independent school communities.

As with any form of change, there are always risks involved that need to be addressed. With the proposed changes to the curriculum, class structure, and policies of the school, there are several risks, but the payoff greatly outweighs the risks. There are two major risks involved with the changes proposed to the curriculum. The cause for concern is the ability of both the students and the teachers to adapt to the changes to the curriculum. Veteran teachers are reluctant to change since many of them have been teaching using the same methods and the same materials for years. The issue will be getting these veteran teachers on board with the new adjustments to the curriculum by changing their teaching methods and creating new materials. If teachers fail to make the necessary adjustments, then the new plans will fall apart and the students will suffer educationally as a result. Ultimately in the end, the teachers at Archbishop Wood High School would be able to make the adjustments in due time.

In this course, students identify, explore, and question prevailing assumptions about education in the United States. The objectives of the course are for students to develop both a deeper understanding of the system’s historical, structural, and philosophical features and to look at schools with a critical eye. We examine issues of power and control at various levels of the education system. Participants are encouraged to connect class readings and discussion to personal schooling experiences to gain new insights into their own educational foundations. Among the questions that are highlighted are: How should schools be organized and operated? What information and values should be emphasized?

From this philosophy statement, it is obvious that this school values growing students, establishing a disciplined growth culture, and improving the self-image of the students. As teachers are often cited as most important factor dictating students’ learning (McCaffery et al, 2003), they play a significant factor in establishing the school’s and classroom culture (Supovitz & Turner, 2000), and building the self-worth of students (Ryan, Stiller, & Lynch

The teacher holds the perspective that his or her controlling role in the education that students receive is justified because the student’s knowledge is minimal compared to his or hers. The teacher maintains the control over the education that their students receive by promoting “obedience to the dictates of the world of school” (Rodriguez 218). The students who adapt best

When creating the long-range plan, there were many factors that I had to keep in mind. Since this long-range plan was created under Professor Jolley for my science methods class, it was required to cover all of the science standards of one grade level over the course of a school year. I had to consider each standards in depth to determine the estimated time it would take to cover. I had to allow for quizzes and tests to be efficiently spread out over the course of the year in order to provide adequate feedback for students and teacher. I also had to reference a school calendar to include school holidays and teacher workdays.

The educational system regulates the dynamics that exists between these two separate collections of people. The teacher plays the dominant role over the student. The teacher leads how the classroom is run and the student is supposed to abide by these rules instituted by the teacher running the classroom. “The capability of banking education to minimize or annul the students’ creative power and to stimulate their credulity serves the interests of the oppressors.” (Freire 73) Teachers in the educational system want to maintain control, order, and power in the classroom. They believe that their authoritative role is necessary in making sure that the classroom environment is effective. The teacher’s word is supposed to be regarded as gold and cannot be opposed in this system. Teachers don’t want to take a backseat to the student or even share an equivalent role. The educational system will succeed if students possess a more equivalent role to their counterpart who are the teachers. Klein says, “With copyright now the U.S.’s single largest

Mass public schooling has created a divide amongst the foundation of whether to prioritize individuality or conformity. If we as a society choose to base schooling off of the guidelines of conformity, the individuality in each and every student will soon be lost due to being forced to comply to the school system, therefore hindering student’s sense of individuality. Prioritizing individuality in the schools allows students to be free of constraints, and to increase their want to learn through being able to differentiate and personalize their schedules. An education system based off of forcing individual and different students to all follow the exact same course standard should be outlawed due to this being an outdated guideline of teaching.

Today new school reforms have been formulated. These reforms are created to form individuals into becoming financially advanced and globally competitive persons. The very means to gauge the progress of the new reform is through test scores. Standardized tests and the test scores are now tantamount to accountability, transforming the educational system into a dehumanized market institution. The school is seen as a capital investment and is now measured according to financial value. Today 's school reforms have seemed to do away with the notion of schools "helping to create people who are fully developed as human beings and as democratic citizens." (Tyack D. 1997) However, amidst the prevailing regress in

Sir Ken Robinson suggested that school totally destroys creativity and student’s behavior. Sir Ken felt the 21st century deprived students from being creative (TED 2006). Creativity was at the bottom of students list Sir Ken suggested. Sir Ken suggests that school was supporting the core subjects and did not feel creativity was important to student’s daily lives (TED 2006). Math, English, science and history are four cores taught in public school which only produced memorized facts (TED 2006). Schools are not concern with the future growth of student. School is more concern how students score on the standardized test.