The Tokugawa Period: Oppressive Feudal System In Japan

Throughout history, the system of feudalism is used several times in different areas in the world. Because of this form of government, the European lifestyle changed dramatically as the Japanese culture began to form. Although feudalism in Europe had started earlier, the feudal systems of Japan and Europe are somewhat alike. However, they are much more different than they are comparable.

The samurai were the feudal warriors of ancient Japan. For thousands of years they upheld the code of bushido, the way of the warrior. Samurai were around for thousands of years, but when did they disappear? Does the code of bushido still exist to this day? Exploring the history of the samurai will give an explanation to what has happened to these formidable warriors.

Japan Test: Feudalism Thinking about our universal theme of chaos vs. order, did Japanese Feudalism have a positive or negative impact on Japan? Use documents 1-4 to support your answer. For many centuries, Japan's society was based on feudalism, a bond of loyalty between a lord and vassal. I believe this system negatively impacted Japan.

Medieval Japan started in 1185 AD and ended in 1868 AD, this time included the Kamakura, Ashikaga, Sengoku-Jidai and the Tokugawa periods. Medieval Europe started with the Early Middle Ages in 476 CE, the High Middle Ages from 1000 to 1300 CE and the Late Middle Ages from 1300 CE to around 1500 CE. In the Japanese bakufu system, the emperor was the highest position then the shogun, daimyo, samurai, peasants, artisans and merchants. On the other hand, Medieval Europe’s highest social class was the pope then king, barons & archbishops, knights, craftsmen, farmers and at the bottom was the peasants. The purpose for feudalism in these times was to give order, it's also helped with protection, wealth,

It is an axiom of human nature that as long as there is an abundance of food, there will be class and government structures. Often, the wealthy rule over the poor and the poor work for the wealthy. Feudalism is one such governing style that bows to this truth. Feudalism was born in medieval Europe and Japan and heavily influenced their cultures and traditions. Feudalism founded itself upon the idea that the wealthy nobles owned the land and gifted it to vassals, who in turn were loyal to the nobles and allowed peasants to work the land, who then intern received protection. Because both societies circumscribed to the same form of government (that is feudalism), there will be similarities in class structure; however, European and Japanese feudalism

The Japanese and European feudal systems such as hierarchies and status, although there were many similarities many differences took part over the time in the Japanese and European time line. Japanese feudalism had some key differences to European feudalism in terms of social structure. The status and power of all roles in bother European and Japanese feudalism was very important and leaving a position for a higher role was quite hard.

The late nineteenth century culminated centuries of progress for the prominent Asian societies of Qing China and Tokugawa Japan, defining their economic strength and influence in foreign affairs. Each society encountered taxing struggles from internal rebellions to external pressures from outside nations. The Qing dynasty in China survived the crises of the 1850s-1860s, while the Tokugawa shogunate in Japan did not (i.e., collapsed) because of a number of important historical differences. Distinct political, social, and foreign policy differences caused seemingly parallel societies to spiral off in opposite directions. With the aid of a highly centralized government, a stable social and political order, and an amicable nature towards foreign policy, the strength of the Chinese government prevailed against both internal and external challenges. Tokugawa Japan ran a course completely opposite of Qing China and ultimately collapsed in the 1860s. Three significant factors leading to this failure resided in its decentralized government, static and hereditary social order, and hostile nature towards foreign affairs. Reviewed first are the factors

Medieval Europe and Tokugawa Japan have many similarities to the way that they run their kingdom. These include that they both use castle's e But they also have many differences. These differences include the soldier system which is the Knights vs the samurais. The class system for Medieval Europe which goes King, Barons,Knight, peasant and the Tokugawa era which goes Emperor, Shogun, Daimyo, Farmers, Artisans, Merchants.

Both Western Europe and Japan used the feudal system from the 800s to the 1700s. The two regions show economic similarities, but differ greatly with respect to politics and society.

The death of emperor Hideyoshi and subsequent ascension to the throne of Hideyori in 1598 set into motion events that would alter the political landscape in Japan for the next two hundred and fifty years. Tokugawa Ieyasu, in his quest to become absolute ruler of Japan defeated Hideyori loyalists in the battle of Sekigahara and was appointed Shogun by Hideyori in 1603. This military “coup d’état” effectively gave Tokugawa complete control of Japan and reduced the emperor to little more than a figurehead in the governing of Japan. As history would show, the feudal system of government that Tokugawa created ultimately led to

Under the Tokugawa Regime, Japan enjoyed more than two centuries of stability and peace. Were it not for a mix of external pressure and its resulting internal discontent, it is feasible that the Tokugawa could have maintained Japanese society for many years to come. The now legendary samurai Saigo Takamori would spend his youth under the regime, while his adulthood would see him overthrowing it. What was it that could cause Saigo to scorn the Tokugawa who had successfully led Japan for so long? It was a combination of the Tokugawa’s decline in traditional ethics as well as modern relevance that caused the principled Saigo to watch its decline with anticipation.

Kenneth Morris 4/25/15 History of Japan Essay topic 2 Meiji Period: The fall of the Tokugawa and the ushering in of a new era of modernization and prosperity for Japan The 1800s were a time of great exploration and revelation for much of the Western world. Ideas and inventions flowed easily throughout the major powers of the world with the help of new powerful ships. It was also a great time for exploration and new trade opportunities for expanding countries such as the United States of America, the Asian trading routes were rich with possibility.

Feudalism was a social system that divided all people into a certain class based on wealth, job, and power. Knights and samurais were both put into this system. Although many believe that knights

Cling! Clash! Bang! A samurai and a knight are fighting one on one in Japan, each defending their nobles. Each warrior was part of a political system which connected Japanese warriors and European warriors were feudalism. Feudalism was an economic system in which the nobles provide integrity and protection to the lords while the lords give land to the nobles. Nobles trained Japanese warriors, or a samurai, in return for protection and faithfulness. Nobles trained European warriors also known as a knight. Knights also have to do the same as a samurai, which was to give protection and loyalty to the nobles. Nobles gave both, the knights and samurais farmland, food, and lodging in exchange for protection. If a samurai and a knight engaged in

Japan’s feudal system was unlike many other feudal systems. It was not based on a person’s wealth but instead was based on how much they could contribute to the society. The system went from the emperor, shoguns, to daimyo, to samurai, to peasants and finally to merchants and craftsmen. Although the merchants were at the bottom of the feudal system and were not well respected by the other classes, they were still able to live great lives. This was because they were able to make a lot of easy money and were needed by the society and so nothing could be done about them. On the other hand they were not as respected and treated well by the other classes and did not have a lot of power.