Aruna Somwaru
GEOG 337
Summary #2
In Hardin’s, The Tragedy of the Commons, he makes two major points that are still widely accepted. He argues that people act in their own self interest which causes them to over use the resources in the commons and that the only way to solve this problem is by utilizing socialism or privatizing free enterprises. This is not always true because there are people who have organized themselves in a way to manager common pool resources that allowed them use a long-term sustainable institution for governing resources. Government ownership and privatization does not always work. In China, Mongolia, and southern Siberia, there are signs of degradation where there is government regulation of the land. China and
…show more content…
They are natural or human constructed resources that connect to short-term thinking. One user can reduce the quality or quantity of a resource by using too much of it and excluding beneficiaries are costly. CPR’s include renewable and delectable resources such as ground water basins and atmosphere. Basically, anything that is on land or in the water. In order to save CPR’s we must restrict people’s access and create incentives for people to invest in the CPRs instead of over using the resources. The notion that CPR depletion is due to resource users overexploiting an area is based on the idea that individuals are selfish, norm-free, and only cares about their short-term gains. Users of CPR are usually narrow and self-interested. These people are free riders, altruist, or people who want to gain something from their interactions with other people. This is why cooperating is better for individuals when they are interacting with people they know rather than strangers. People within this group become trust worthy and others will want to cooperate with them. This is good for their offspring and their access to the resource. Well-managed CPRs exist in Nepal where they have a monitored irrigation system that relies on locally crafted rules and evolved norms. When the government became involved, their yields were reduce, people’s access to the resource was cut off and lead to the possibilities of people having to pay in the future. Solving these dilemmas are never easy or error free. However, we need to figure out a way in which we could take what we’ve learned from the past, our failures, and success and use it to better the way we look at CPRs
Throughout history there have been many examples of tragedy of the commons. Tragedy of the commons is when people in a certain area over exploit a common resource which leads toa higher problem. Tragedy of the commons normally happens when people get greedy and get more than they really need. For example, if one farmer is public grazing area were to add a cow over the limit the field can sustain it won’t do much damage but if the other farmers also add another cow to the field it could end up harming it to the point where it is no longer usable.This comes to show that if even a single person becomes greedy it could ruin so many things for other people. Ideas will be pulled out from Hardin’s “The Tragedy of the Commons” to be used in this essay.
“Tragedy of the Commons” means is a situation within a shared-resource structure where people act by themself without thinking about the common good used by others by depleting that resource through their action because of their own selfish gain.
Logos is the logic, internal consistency, and clarity of the argument and it is split into claims, reasons, grounds, warrants, backing, and qualifiers. Hardin begins his essay by establishing his main claim, which is the idea that he believes is the most believable, that the world’s resources cannot be distributed equally, and any attempts to equally distribute current resources will ruin them. He does this by using the metaphor of the earth and its resources as a lifeboat. Only so many people may fit on this lifeboat, just as so many people may have access to the world’s very limited resources, and trying to fit too many people on this lifeboat will sink it. This phenomenon he calls “The Tragedy of the Commons”. He supports this claim with reasons and grounds; reasons being claims which support his initial claim, and grounds being supporting evidence that leads the audience to support the reasons. His warrant, or understood belief, is that spoiling resources and leading the world to ruin is not optimal,
The tragedy of the commons is a pretty basic concept. So essentially, this theory states that people will use a shared resource to their own self-interests and ultimately “consume” the resource until its value is diminished (Brander, 2014).
Another problem with public goods is the tragedy of the commons. The tragedy of the commons occurs when individual people or parties disregard the well-being of the society in pursuing personal gains. When every country tries to gain the most benefits from abusing the climate, the demand will rapidly consume the supply of the resource, due to the country not
Garrett Hardin developed the concept of the Tragedy of the Commons. The basic concept is a giant pasture that is for everyone to have a piece of land and for the herdsman to have as many cattle a possible to sustain the land. This land should be able to maintain itself for quite a long time because of cattle dying as well as the population staying relatively stable. But at some point the population will begin growing and the herdsman will want to maximize their profits by having more cattle, which in return the land cannot sustain. The herdsman receives all the profit from adding one more animal to the pasture so the herdsman will eventually begin adding more cattle, but the overgrazing caused by that added animal will destroy the land
The consideration of preserving life with humanity requires a foundational ability to meet with adequately supplying enough resources to sustain continued support of essential supplies to provide for humanity’s needs. Undoubtedly, food and shelter encompasses a key part therein, as well as somehow maintaining a healthy form of living. What would it take to accurately assess everything is essentially what “The Tragedy of the Commons by Garrett Hardin” (The Garrett Hardin Society, 2015, title) attempt has to cover in thoughtful analogy utilizing some commonsense mixed with a socialist view.
In the activity “Tragedy of Commons” 4 people had to share a pond with each other which includes 16 fishes. The people have to fish enough fish to support their families, but cannot deplete the supply of fish to 0 (game over) in a time period of a year. If the person gets 1 fish then that person’s family starves, if the person has 2 fish then the person can use that for profit. Each remaining fish reproduces 1 new fish every year. Later each person will “get” their own private pond that they can fish from (same process/procedure). This will be easier to support the individual’s family, along with keeping the supply of the fish sufficient.
Economic activity and our environment have been closely linked since man first discovered the concept of trade. In the language of economics, the environment has itself, become an increasingly “scarce resource1”. Since economics is about managing these scarce resources, it will be a useful tool when considering some of the environmental issues facing our planet. One of the major concerns confronting the environment today is the overfishing of the world’s oceans, depleting some species to near extinction. With continued advances in technological and industrial proficiency, fishing vessels are able to fish across the globe, further exacerbating the effects of overfishing. Because the oceans are considered a shared or common
The classic essay Tragedy of the Commons describes the dilemma society faces when the interests of a group conflicts with the interests of individuals (Hardin, 1968). The example presented is that of a group of cattle ranchers commingling their cattle in a common pasture. At full capacity, each cattle owner still has an incentive to include additional cattle, since the slight decrease in overall yield per animal is offset by the additional animal. Unfortunately, this overgrazing inevitably leads to failure of the commons. The community goal of maximizing food production can only be achieved by placing controls on the interests of the individual cattle ranchers in favor of those of the community (Hardin, 1968). This paper is
These social dilemmas are related to common-pool resources. The problem of free riding can be an issue. . There has to be governance of common pool resources. If, for example collective action was man’s natural instinct then
While appealing to humanitarian causes, this plan can lead to what Hardin calls “the tragedy of the commons”. Because the resources are equally distributed with equal access, no one person is in control. This can lead to abusing and overexploiting the resources. A real-world example of this theory is the World Food Bank. The World Food Bank was a suggestion that rich countries donate food to the bank and in an emergency any country could withdraw from it. Hardin argues that such a bank would perpetuate the cycle of world hunger and it would deplete the world of its natural resources, only making the problem
The decline of the environment due to natural and human exertion is known as the degradation of the environment. The natural weather occurrences such as heavy rain, flooding, storms, earthquakes, volcanoes etc. are not administered under human control. These meteorological phenomenon’s wreak devastation on the environment from time to time causing the land to become unsuitable to cultivate. On this subject matter, the human population does not contain the power to stop the wrath of Mother Nature. Rather, we are forced to sit back and watch. Nevertheless, humans engage in a crucial role towards the degradation of the environment in which we live in. Unavoidably, the degradation of the environment is a rising and utmost worldwide subject. I accept that the root cause to environmental degradation is the excessive use of resources on our land utilized by the processes under capitalism. As Jensen wrote in Endgame, “The global industrial economy is the engine for massive environmental degradation and massive human and (nonhuman) impoverishment.
Garrett Hardin published in Psychology Today in September 1974. This passage is an excerpt from his popular paper “The Tragedy of the Commons” as a warning that overpopulation was dangerous due to how limited Earth’s resources are. This theory is reflected in Hardin’s thesis that the rich should do nothing to help the people of poor nations and turn away those trying to come in. Hardin used the imagery of a lifeboat almost filled in a sea full of drowning people to pose and answer a single question, “what should the lifeboat passengers do?” (290). Hardin's answer was to defend the boat against all trying to board. If anyone felt guilty about this course of action they should feel free to swap places with a drowning man and give them their
A single, comprehensive solution to environmental challenges does not exist. The subject matter of the environment is interdisciplinary and entails diverse sets of strategies and solutions. Historically, collective action solutions have focused on conventional governmental regulations or privatization. It operates under the assumption that under the established apparatus of government and private institutions, individuals could join cooperative efforts and contribute to the cause. Hardin argued for the centralized administration of resources by governmental agencies or the privatization of the commons and allow the private enterprise to manage the common as it sees fit (Hardin 1968). Nobel prizing winning economist, Elinor Ostrom disputed such claims, asserting that governments have large agendas and cannot consider local environmental problems and some resources such as water and air cannot be privatized. Ostrom insists that the state or the market cannot be successful in ensuring the sustainable use of natural resources (Ostrom 1990). According to Ostrom and her research, an alternative approach to the problem of the commons is community mobilization, or polycentric governance. The alternative approach is characterized by multiple cooperative independent institutions organized and governed under a general system of rules. The citizens and officials of the community all come together to jointly chart the priorities and management of their local resources, while balancing