The Trans Pacific Partnership

The Trans-Pacific Partnership aims to establish a tariff free economic cooperation zones between twelve countries around the Pacific Ocean. These countries are the United States, Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore and Vietnam, thus creating the largest trade zone in the world (Jackson, 2015). The

The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) is a grand, 21st century regional free-trade treaty which was commenced on 2003. It initiated as a trade contract involving Singapore, New Zealand and Chile. Presently, the TPP consists of 12 countries as their members that includes US, Malaysia, Mexico, Canada, Japan, Brunei, China, Korea, Australia, Peru and Vietnam. Other countries like Bangladesh, Philippines, Indonesia, India etc. have also revealed their concern in merging with the TPP trade agreement. In 2011 the Trans-Pacific Partnership countries declared that the TPP is expected to “develop trade and investment accompanied by the TPP partner countries, to uphold innovation, economic expansion and advancement, and to support the formation and preservation of jobs. TPP will undo prospects for American employees, families, businesses, farmers, and ranchers by offering increased permission to some of the greatest growing markets in the world.

Two of the well-known theories are absolute advantage and comparative advantage theory. Absolute advantage trade theory is when the producer is able to input a small amount to produce a good or service. It is also recognized to attain better through the acts of low-cost production. By this I mean, an example of absolute advantage is when a small country like China manufacture or produce a good and participate in the ability to have low labor cost on that item. Meanwhile, comparative advantage is the action of a country being able to produce or manufacture a good/service at a lower cost than another country. When having the theory of comparative advantage country that produces an item has an advantage over the company that has a desire for that specific item. Their ability to produce the item locally gives them a cheaper source of the ingredient causing them to offer their product cheaper than other companies. The Trans-Pacific Pacific Partnership is an agreement that has threatened to extend restrictive intellectual property laws across the world and rewrite international rules on its enforcement. Countries involved in the TPP are Australia, Peru, Japan, Canada, Vietnam, Brunei, Chile, New Zealand, Singapore, Malaysia, and Mexico. Basically, all the countries along the Pacific Ocean signed the agreement on February 4, 2016. The trade agreement is said to makes trading easier, adds intellectual property protection, and raises labor environmental standards in all countries involved, but there is no set person to write the rules and regulations to the agreement along with no one to make sure they are enforced. If the U.S doesn’t ratify the agreement, China can step in and continue to dominate and control the market. I believe if done right TPP can bring world domination for all countries to work together in creating one huge market to live by. Regional trading groups are

The greatest achievement that I have been able to accomplish in terms of securing the material national interest of the United States has been the agreement of the Trans-Pacific Partnership. This trade agreement amongst twelve member states (United States, Canada, Chile, Peru, Zealand, Australia, Brunei, Singapore, Vietnam, Malaysia, and Japan) was adopted to strengthen the economic ties for a more interconnected global economy. For the average working American it shows great promise to increase their income and for the nation as a whole. It also possesses the potential to allow for the growth of the nation’s GDP and annual exports, thereby increasing the living standard.

Apart from the free trade alliances with the U.S, Canada is also seen to possess agreements such as TPP (Trans-Pacific Partnership) and CETA (Canada-EU Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement). These trade agreements have facilitated creating strategic alliances with a number of nations such as Japan, Malaysia, Vietnam and Australia. Additionally strategic alliances have also been facilitated with many European nations19. Apart from reduction in tariff rates, trade of services, intellectual property and investments have become much more regulated and transparent. Expansion into Canada would therefore enable the companies to take advantage of such free trade agreements and develop alliances globally20. Since such trade alliances have strengthened the economy, infrastructural development in the nation has been quite rapid. Ease in business operations has therefore been facilitated. Additionally, access of new foreign markets have also become easy12.

The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) was introduce as vehicle spark growth between the United State and the European Union. The US and EU represent the most developed, modern and committed to the highest consumer protection in the world. It is the T-TIP goal to capitalize on the relationship by providing economic growth and more jobs to US and EU to 13 million jobs already supported by transatlantic trade and investment. It is the T-TIP goal and desire to cut the edge and tariff agreements to allow for greater compatibility and transparency, in trade and investment regulations, while maintaining high level of health, safety and environmental protection.

of markets, including the auto industry, and in the spotlight, the dairy and beef markets.

A draft of a top-secret piece of interstate agreement on the Trans- Pacific Partnership leaked online causing a hot status to its discussion. Trans -Pacific Partnership (TPP) - is the largest supra-trade and economic organization, the creation of which is scheduled for completion by the end of 2013. In an agreement on the TPP participating countries, generating more than 40% of global GDP: the U.S., Australia, Canada, Mexico, Japan, Singapore, New Zealand, Malaysia, Brunei, Chile, Vietnam and Peru. China and Russia are not included to this list.

In support of Trans-Pacific Partnership, the United States companies are more successful when it comes to selling goods and services across the Pacific Rim. Making it possible for America to be the business functioning country we are so known as. A stronger economy means more jobs and higher incomes for our workers. Against TPP, the benefits ensue only to big companies and their shareholders. Causing those who are on the other side of the stick to see job losses and income reductions.

The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and Michael Froman (United States Trade Representative) need to decide whether it is necessary to reduce tariffs to benefit Americans and the economy or keep the tariffs in order to keep certain manufacturing jobs in the United States.

With both social and economic aspects of Trans-Pacific Partnership agreement being examined with a vast of details, it can be concluded that the U.S. Congress shall not approve TPP agreement. This is best option because the cost associated with TPP will be critical to the U.S. society both in economic and sociological ways. Although there are enormous benefits to TPP, the costs associated are too harmful and outbalance gain from TPP. The government should not take the risky choice to improve economy and fix social gap problem.

As mentioned earlier, the TPP is a major potential free trade agreement between twelve of the Pacific Rim countries. The countries are Australia, Canada, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, Peru, The United States, Vietnam, Brunei, Chile, New Zealand, and Singapore (Freil, Sharon, Gleeson, Thow, Labonte, Stuckler, Kay, and Snowdon 1). Interestingly enough, this agreement is the technical successor to the P4 agreement that was initialised in 2006 (Elms 29). This agreement was held between Chile, Brunei, New Zealand, and Singapore. In 2008 the U.S. showed large interest in joining this agreement giving spark to a new agreement that has enticed other Pacific Rim countries (Elms 29). Taking charge of this new agreement the U.S. has laid down most of the TPP 's foundation to create an agreement that should allow for a

Since 2010, government and corporate representatives have been meeting, frequently in extreme secrecy, to outline their plans for the Trans-Pacific Partnership, a substantial expansion and revision of the original 2005 Trans-Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership Agreement between Brunei, Chile, New Zealand, and Singapore (Hsieh 368). The new agreement would include at least five other countries (Canada, Malaysia, Mexico, Peru, the United States, and Vietnam), with the potential for Japan and South Korea to join as well (Office of the United States Trade Representative). The Trans-Pacific Partnership represents the single most important development in the area of economic globalization since the passage of the North American Free Trade Agreement in 1994. However, the extreme secrecy with which the agreement is being negotiated has led many to believe that its contents would likely prove unpopular with the general public. Exploring the limited information available via public announcements and leaked documents reveals that current plans for the partnership go well beyond regulating trade relations between nations to include things like onerous copyright and intellectual property restrictions, limitations on national and state-level product safety regulation, environmental standards, and labor organization. In light of these serious problems, it appears that a better way to encourage development and distribute the benefits of free trade across the world would be to open up

The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) is an economic free trade agreement currently being negotiated between New Zealand and 11 other Pacific Rim nations (Wyber & Perry, 2013). It seeks to reduce trade restrictions including tariffs, create shared guidelines for intellectual property rights, sanction codes for environmental and labour regulations, and create an investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) system (Fergusson, McMinimy & Williams, 2015). The implications of the TPP are immense, encompassing nearly 40% of global gross domestic product (GDP), with the potential to affect various aspects of a nations’ domestic policy environment (Wyber & Perry, 2013). On-going formal mediations have taken place since 2008; however public interest in the ramifications of the agreement has increased as negotiations have proceeded (Wyber & Perry, 2013). This is likely a result of its growing media coverage, which has raised public awareness to the issue. The private nature of TPP negotiations has evoked widespread controversy and debate throughout the media (Jairath, Johnstone & Moore, 2015). While confidentiality amid trade agreements is common, some consider that the TPP has been concealed in specific secrecy, giving more influential power to industries involved (Wyber & Perry, 2013).

The Trans-Pacific Partnership has been in the works between the EU and Japan since 2013 for a free trade agreement and Non-Tariff Measures in order to ease the burdens of existing trade barriers with Japan. Urgency recently developed when the Trump, the President of the United States of America, left the partnership affecting the other 11 members of the trading bloc. (EU-Japan Center for Industrial Cooperation , 2017)