The Transference Across The Case Of Dora ( 1905 ) Essay

Transference can be describe as the unfinished business of an individual, unconscious feelings and behaviors or cognitive distortions that are or could be repeated while individuals get to know their new relationships, friends, or even therapist. Moreover, Levy and Scala (2012) defined “transference as a tendency in which representational aspects of important and formative relationships can be both consciously experienced and/or unconsciously ascribed to other relationships” (as cited in Ulberg, R., Svein, A., Critchfield, K. L., Marble, A., and Høglend, P, 2014 .p.267). Furthermore, the past experiences and memories can comes to light when meeting new people; those perceptions that are scripted in our brain influence our future relations with other people in society (Cheri L. Marmarosh 2012). In contrast, the countertransference is when the therapist/Mental health counselor has

Transference and counter transference is one of most important aspects of treatment between patient and practitioner. In a clinical setting we do not always have the opportunity to have consecutive treatments with the same patient and as a result may not be able to acknowledge or notice these occurrences. It is not often that I have the opportunity to see a patient on a regular basis or even twice for that matter. As a result, it is not possible for me to notice or recognize any transference that the patient my have towards me. At times however, I clearly know the impose counter-transference & boundaries issues which patient and I experience.

However, counter-transference is caused by the counsellors own limitations which might include the counsellor unresolved emotional issues, but a counsellor can use this to their advantage and draw out information that is important to the clients therapeutic process.

The following essay will aim to explore two developmental theories. It will also look at how they have become relevant in counselling and psychotherapy practice, how they should be helpful and offer support when a presenting issue occurs from a client, and how the counsellor will work in partnership with the client. The chosen theories are based on John Bowlby’s attachment theory and David Winnicott’s developmental theory.

Susanna would benefit most from a psychodynamic treatment approach, with a specific emphasis on clarification, confrontation, and interpretation/transference interpretation. As highlighted by McWilliams (1999), recurrent themes emerge within the therapy which constitute the client’s internal and external world. With this in mind, Susanna’s internal object relations would undoubtedly unfold in the relationship with the therapist. As Susanna evidences a lack of insight, it will be the therapist’s responsibility to clarify Susanna’s experiences for her. In this view, clarification refers to the reformulation of the patient’s verbalizations to convey a more coherent view of what is being communicated. The therapist may want to clarify what it was like in Susanna’s household growing up, and gather further information on Susanna’s romantic relationships. Clarifying sentiments might include “you stated that at times you felt loved by your mother, and hated at other times, but overall do you feel that your mother loves you?”

Often, therapy is significant if the family changes its perception of a situation or discovers exceptions to troublesome times. Regardless, whatever the family brings to therapy is examined from a broad context. The past is not emphasized, except when it calls attention to the present. (Gladding, 2009)

The transference/counter-transference concept is considered an essential part of the analytical process and plays a fundamental part in creating therapeutic change. Clarkson (2003) has identified transference and counter-transference as one of the 5 strands in her model of the therapeutic relationship. Clarkson (2003) defines the transference/counter-transference relationship as the ‘experience of distortion of the working alliance by wishes and fears and experiences from the past transferred onto or into the therapeutic partnership’. This essay will examine the development

Transference-focused psychotherapy – tries to help the person understand why they are feeling the way they are and the difficulties it may have caused with social/family relationships.

Britzman and Pitt (1996) described transference as impression of unresolved past conflict with others that is projected into the new interaction and relationship. Usher (2013) suggested that transference occurs when the client makes fabricated connection to the therapist. Freud proposed that transference occurs unconsciously in two ways: Template is when the client attempts to categorises all their later relationship based on the earlier relationship; and repetition compulsion is when the client replays traumatic past relationship or situation (Kahn, 2003). For example, if a client has a critical mother, then, they will categorise all women of certain age and characteristics to that template. And client sees the therapist as the critical mother and repetition causes them to act in certain ways to get the reaction they want from the therapist. Freud found that transference occurs everywhere, and it is not isolated to just therapy setting.

Object relations theory focuses on individuals’ perceived representation of relationships which are often formed with significant others at an early age and recognizes that these may be more significant than current relationships in shaping behavior. Object relations theory considers attachments and the quality of past attachments as individuals with secure attachments are can exhibit greater resiliency in relationships of stressful life situations. Additionally, individuals can experience transference when clients unconsciously project “feelings, thoughts, and wishes onto the practitioner, who comes to represent a person from the client’s past such as a parent, sibling, other relative, or teacher” (p.

I am a proponentof the benefits of self-awaeness, and the ability to conceptualize one’s life and unresolved issues in order to being a therapeutic healing process. I ascribe to the idea than an individual’s past, has the potential to have a significant effe cct on their present life. Often tiems, what triggers maladaptive behaviors are issues linked to a suppressed past. With that siaid the theory that I chose for this week’s assignment is Freud’s the psychoanlaytic theory. This theory speaks to the significance of a client’s self-awareness, an ability to help conceptualize as well as the influences of n individual’s past on their present behavior. (Thomas, 2008).

In counseling, there are various theories that are used to understand and assist the client. These theories of communication stem from various perspectives that include behavioral, cognitive and humanistic. The choice of the theory to use in the counseling session depends on both counselor’s psychological orientation and psychopathology approach. Therefore, it is crucial for therapists to understand various theories and choose one that fits particular situations and styles of communication (Ahmed, 2012). Psychodynamic theory places emphasis on both early childhood experiences and dreams, and unconscious wishes. This theory believes that the personality of a person is motivated by various inner forces, conflict and memories (Berzoff et al.,

The identification and interpretation of transference is a cornerstone of psychodynamic therapy. Through the linking of the here and now interactions of client and therapist with experiences from the past, transference interpretations can often serve as a valuable tool for insight and change.

Goldenberg et al. (2016) state that Bowen insisted how counsellors providing therapy for families need to make sure their past does not affect the sessions with their clients. Completing this assignment has made me become more aware that I need to resolve my problems and emotional attachments with my family, and how my parents may also have unresolved issues from

A similar tendency to always situate the individuals in the family and society was explicit in early Freud. By “curing” the patients, Freud aimed at helping them to go back to their social settings and to continue