The Transformation Process That Interface Went Through

The modern business culture must, by necessity, be fluid if it is to succeed globally. There is interaction between employees, between stakeholders, and between global environments. In fact, this environment is formed through multiple interactions between the strengths, weaknesses and opportunities presented through the organization's unique culture. Since truly the one constant in business is change, it is how we adapt to such changes; as individuals and part of groups, that helps manifest behaviors as he culture evolves. Indeed, many believe that one of the templates that make up this fluidity is the concept, even more popular in the late 20th and early 21st centuries, of mergers and acquisitions (Horibe, 2001).

The case of Karen Leary illustrates the implications cultural conflict can have on business organizations and office culture. A common mistake managers make is undermining the power of cultural constraints at the organizational level. After six years as a financial consultant at Merrill Lynch, Karen Leary was promoted to general manager at the Elmville branch in Chicago. Leary wanted to achieve success at the branch office by building high-producing, successful group of professionals who work together to provide clients with complete service in meeting long-term financial goals.

The last stage is the follow through stage it involves institutionalising the new approaches in the organisational culture. Old habits, values, traditions and mindsets are permanently replaced. New values and beliefs are instilled in the culture so that employees view the changes as a normal and integral part of the way the organisation operates, it also requires the developing of a means to ensure leadership development and succession so that new values and behaviours are carried forward to the next generation of leadership.(Cengage Learning AUS, 2015)

*  Culture is Negotiated. One person cannot create a culture alone. Employees must try to change the direction, the work environment, the way work is performed, or the manner in which decisions are made within the general norms of the workplace. Culture change is a process of give and take by all members of an organization. Formalizing strategic direction, systems development, and establishing measurements must be owned by the group responsible

A cultural change needs to have an integrated approach that includes multiple diversity initiatives. Those include: leadership commitment, effective organizational communication about diversity, clarity about how diversity fits within the

In the case of Innostat, the main issue on the culture of the organization has led to a bad productivity and has affected its effectiveness and efficiency. This portrays that Innostat has overlooked the importance of culture which claims by Schein (2004) as powerful energy for the organization in order to reach the goals. Hence, Innostat is now struggling to bring back its innovating edge. By referring to the Burke-Litwin Model (1992), it can be seen that there is an interconnectedness of four factors including leadership, culture, work unit climate and motivation which the effects will be analyze using the same model shortly. Ultimately, this analysis proposes that the most crucial issue to be addressed in the case of Innostat is

The intent of the proposal is to address the case brought forward to our organization concerning “The Young Change Agents,” at Price Waterhouse (PW) who later merged with Coopers & Lybrand. It is my understanding that the platform to address the need for change in the organization plummeted with three young pioneers (Shaw, Middleburg and Sgaralgli) recognized a need for change. Prior to Shaw and Middleburg arrival to PWC, they had an opportunity to work in a well-known student organization AIESEC. In their tenure at AIESEC life was different, as Shaw recalled while operating as the president of the national organization in New Zealand division; he recognized that AIESEC focused on developing his leadership skills by focusing on such programs as skills, attitudes, values and cultural understanding. Furthermore, he noted that his transition to PwC led to a lower echelon, and it was difficult to transition from the president to a staff member. PwC also had a high spending budget for stationery compared to New Zealand AIESEC. Moreover, the technology was not up to par for such a large cooperation. (Jick & Peiperl, p. 463) Shaw and Middleburg later partnered with Sgaralgi to fight the deficiencies that they saw in PwC. They created a force that focused on overhauling the existing values at PwC. They approached each situation, manager and employee one step at a time. Expecting nothing in return, but only to share their message on the new

The IT folks couldn’t communicate properly with the business about their ideas and strategy that confused the business and made them reject the ideas that were actually worth trying.

2. What are the key problems related to cultural differences and which integration approach should the company follow to overcome these problems?

In this individual assignment, reading material including the different ways companies innovate, re-energize a mature organization, and change corporate culture provide the basis for analyzing British Airways’ (BA) transformation and the difficulties encountered in making an organizational change. Identification of critical factors leading to British Airways successful transformation as well as steps, sequence, and risks taken to transform the organization and personal assessment is provided for this case study.

This shift is not easy as many forces hinder the process both economical and politically and requires “focusing on internal positive factors” (Perlmutter, 1969:18) such as communication and unified corporate culture of subsidiaries and HQ (Gong ,2003:730). The Geocentric approach also depends on the mindset of an individual to initiate the process (Garrow, & Hirsh, 2008:400)thus requires orientation of HQ and subsidiaries for understanding the integration process which overcomes internal indifferences.

There is a multitude of reasons as to why an organization may change their culture. Some catalysts to cultural change could be such things as changes in the economy, external events, internal shortcomings, restructuring of leadership, or growth of technological capabilities. Since IBM was founded in 1911, it has undergone a multitude of cultural changes driven by each one of these factors. The 1990’s included a large cultural shift for this organization driven by a new CEO and new technological capabilities.

From the onset of this case, it is evident that there is a form of organizational culture that is dwelling at Intel. While Tang understands this, he fails to maneuver his management skills to accommodate the change that he is bringing forth.

The competing values framework represents a theory, based on the crucial indicators of an effective organization. It revolves around four major components of organizational culture, which measure the organization's leadership style, institutional bonding, strategic emphases and general cultural characteristics. Leaders and managers benefit from this conceptual framework as it offers teaching tools and helps interpret various organizational functions and processes. In order the examine the organizational culture more in depth, this framework has been extended (Quinn and Kimberly, 1984, p 298). They identified the two main dimensions upon which the competing values framework of cultured is based : the competing demand of change and stability, and the conflicting demands created by the internal organization and the external environment. These dimensions were reflected by other scholars as Thomson

A cultural fit. Every organization culture is marginally different, and each is based on different core values. What