The Trump 's Political Rise During The Presidential Election Of 2016

April 2015 was the year Donald Trump, the Republican, announced to the public his serious interest in joining the 2016 presidency election. Trump 's highest interest is immigrants crossing the U.S.-Mexico border, and states they are "criminals.” He blames the race of Mexicans of robbing Americans jobs, and treating Americans like babies (Miller, n.pag.). What he does not know, is that not all Mexicans are "criminals," and we are not robbing Americans ' jobs. Most of us come to United States to work our hardest, and get a better job. Trump not only is he a racist, but he also has made many unprofessional actions and decisions. We should not be voting for Donald Trump because his ruthless actions against immigrants are strongly affecting our society and segregating most races within each other. He can be a dangerous future president who is carelessly choosing between the white American and Mexican.Trump shows a high interest in segregation among all races and blames most of the unemployed by allowing Mexicans to “take over”.

With the rise of Donald Trump in the United States and of European far right wing parties (some with fascist tendencies) we are seeing a new rise of conservatism in the western world in the last years. Why has this happened so fast? Is a natural tendency that follows too liberal and progressive governments?

Many American’s were surprised with the results of the 2016 Presidential Election. With Clinton predicted to win with more than seventy percent of the votes, so many Americans were upset or troubled to wake up to Donald Trump as their new president-elect. After the results of the election, violence has broken out throughout the country, mainly targeted at minorities. With the country in an uproar, one may think, how does this sort of situation happen? One could blame the media for this lack of information or surprise outcome of the election. The media has changed this election from the way we view our candidates to who we predicted to win through social media, journalistic bias and people’s internal filter.

The media has always played an important role in the President’s relationship with the public, but just what kind of affect does it really have on the executive office? The first televised presidential debate in 1960 between John F. Kennedy and Richard Nixon marked the beginning of a new era – the inaugural shift of the media’s role in politics. Since that time, the media has continued to transform the way the president is perceived by the public through print, broadcast, and more recently, social media. All of said outlets have played vital roles in not only a president’s campaign, but also in their presidency and likability throughout their time in office. While the White House is still the source of most presidential news, the media are the shapers of the story and can frame it pretty much any way they want. There used to be limits on certain issues or realms of the presidency that were to remain untouched, however, first amendment freedoms take precedence over almost any restriction the government could try to place on the media. The purpose of this paper is to explore the relationship between the media and the president throughout recent years, looking briefly into the past to establish the scale of the dramatic change, and to study their reciprocal connection of how each utilizes the other.

After a long history of toying with the idea of running for election, Donald Trump’s announcement speech this June was enough to get the nation talking. Not only because he was finally making good on a decade’s worth of promises, but also because his offensive declarations were unprecedented in the world of ‘P.C.’ American politicians. Trump’s claims of Mexican rapists, drug lords, and criminal cartels flooding over our borders seemed completely outrageous coming from a man running for President. Accordingly so, it wasn’t long before the Trump campaign

Trump would have made waves just by announcing that he was running for president, but what really riled people up were his negative and arguably racist comments about Latinos. He characterized them as criminals, drug runners and rapists, all while arguing that he would keep them out of the country if he were elected. Since that moment, the media, political pundits and political operatives have been having a field day. Through it all, Donald Trump has not backed down from what he said and his support among Republican voters has skyrocketed.

Donald Trump announces his candidacy by insulting Mexicans and calling for a ban on Muslims. He went on to say that he would build this wall and MAKE Mexico pay for it. In his SO CALLED outreach to African-Americans, he insulted the Black Community with his disrespectful rhetoric. Trump didn’t stop there. His bullying on twitter against women, a Gold Star Family, the FBI, and people who don’t agree with him had been relentless until his aides took away his twitter account the last few days before election day. In his last debate with Hillary Clinton, he interrupted her by calling her a “Nasty Woman”, simply because she stated that he would pay more taxes under her administration if he didn’t find a way to get out of it. Trump thought because he was rich, arrogant, and egotistical that he could get away with bullying and

What is more distressing than watching the media become spectators instead of doing their job of asking hard hitting questions or correcting the inaccuracies that form the basis of Mr. Trump’s campaign, is listening to their so-called analysis of why he has become popular and leading the polls among other Republican candidates. The current narrative is that he has

President-elect Donald Trump launched his presidential bid discussing immigration reform. Strict immigration policies quickly became the forefront of his campaign and he says it will also be the focus of his first 100 days in office. A look at the evolution of Trump’s immigration plan reveals simply a feeble attempt to appear more presidential and diplomatic rather than an actual evolution of thought or even an attempt to be realistic.

Mr. Trump’s comments reignited a nationwide debate over illegal immigration from Mexico to the United States. The issue quickly became one of the most controversial matters facing the candidates on their 2016 quest for the White House. Republican and Democratic contenders alike have struggled to devise practical solutions for this complex issue.

The Presidential Election of 2016 is not until November, but both parties are beginning to narrow their fields down and begin their preparation for an election that is expected to be highly contested. With previous election seasons, the current primary season has already seen some notable in-fighting within the two major political parties, with potential candidates attacking each other in an attempt to get their party nominated. What is very interesting is how fluctuating the support for a candidate can be during the primary season. For example, Republican Donald Trump once had a formable lead over the next contender Hillary Clinton. In the democratic field, the top three candidates were Hillary Clinton , Bernie Sanders, and Martin O Malley. [1]

The politic arena is a media circus (entertainment) because of the way the Donald Trump from the Republican Party has been behaving. Trump’s successes throughout the caucuses have been accomplished after a series of exchanging insults. Trump and Clinton, known for their disrespectful remarks, have turned the debates into a level of disrespect, questioning the future of America. The politic arena is no longer about politics and policies, but about who made the biggest comeback. The media has contributed to this circus attraction by giving these remarks the spotlight. By reflecting on the media, Trump has been able to target every audience through different tactics. These candidates say they want the best for America. However, their focus on competition has diminished the true meaning of becoming

Trump,” Daniel Henninger takes a different approach on the relationship between Trump and the media than that of Dowd. Henninger begins his article with a metaphor by saying, “Donald Trump is right that the Media is making a mountain out of a molehill.” (Henninger) Unlike Dowd, Henninger believes that the media is shining Trump is a negative light and that the press escalate stories from what they actually are. He later continued by using a simile to describe the issue. He says, “I think that most people look upon the pitched battle of Trump and the news media as they would a playground fight between sixth graders.” (Henninger) Henninger uses logos to explain why Trump has such a unique relationship with the media. He states, “It is happening because the presidential campaign did not end last November.” (Henninger) He says this to ensure that his audience understands that the campaign endures in the white house among the press and that they use one another for

When a country has experienced tension in the past, the route chosen has usually been political change. Throughout the twentieth and twenty first century, movements from both ends of the political spectrum have spread all over the world. Leftist movements like socialism and communism arose. However, the right end of the political spectrum had movements like fascism. With the 2016 presidential election being held in the United States, this pattern has surfaced yet again. In many ways, the counterpart for Bernie Sander’s “Political Revolution” is offered by the likely GOP nominee, Donald Trump. Trump, both widely liked and hated across the globe, has been called many names. While some terms may exaggerate the truth, one of these terms has legitimate truth to it: fascist. Donald Trump has proved that he is a fascist through his policies, rallies, and presence on social media.

In campaigning, media coverage plays a large role for candidates. They use the media to make their name heard and image seen. “Nearly everything a candidate does is geared toward the media, especially television” (Stuckey, 1999, p. 99) Candidates make appearances on talk shows,