The Truth About Lawyers Essay

Did you know that at present, there is only one lawyer for every 247 Americans in the Unites States? A lawyer is “a person trained in the legal profession who acts for and advises clients or pleads in court” (Webster’s Dictionary and Thesaurus). According to about careers, there are many different types of lawyers, among the top five highest paying legal professionals around the globe are trial lawyers. The first lawyers, also known as the “Gilded Lawyers” arranged the United Auto Workers (UAW) and the Congress of Industrial Organizations (CIO) in the early 1930s (“National Lawyers Guild). The actions the Gilded Lawyers made gave them useful experience for defending the rights given to us by the First Amendment and suffused the work of the business in later years. Today, trial lawyers must meet specific job requirements and qualifications such as working under stressful conditions for long periods of time, making a profitable salary, and keeping up with the ever changing future needs for the career.

Criticisms of lawyers are the topic in Richard A. Wasserstrom's article "Lawyers as Professionals: Some Moral Issues." Wasserstrom broke this topic into two main areas of discussion. The first suggests that lawyers operate with essentially no regard for any negative impact of their efforts on the world at large. Analysis of the relationship that exists between the lawyer and their client was the second topic of discussion. "Here the charge is that it is the lawyer-client relationship which is morally objectionable because it is a relationship which the lawyer dominates and in which the lawyer typically, and perhaps inevitably, treats the client in both an

I took a field trip in college to the local courthouse where we got to pick the brains of the attorneys who worked there. What I found out there was shocking to say the least. I discovered that the work load for public defenders is so high that a lot of cases take months to be presented. They also said most lawyers coming out of law school do not want to be public defenders. The idea to fight for the underdog and to give him or her the best shot they have to get the right decisions in their court case is what being a lawyer is all about. I understand when being a public defender, your cliental isn’t always the cream of the crop, but just because they have had a hard life and made some bad choices doesn’t mean that they should get any less of an attorney. However, someone who has done the most heinous of crimes, but has all the money in the world to pay for a top of the line lawyer usually will be found not guilty. I was told in court cases, the facts speak the truth, no matter what they are, but it takes a great lawyer to deliver those facts home to a jury of our peers. As a result, we see countless times where high prices attorneys get their clients off due to the fact they are just better trained and have more experience finding loopholes in the law. The passion for the truth should always set people free. What we need are more people who are willing to be great lawyers and help those who are less fortunate. I believe that is what I am being called to do. I understand to become a great lawyer you will hit snags and fall down. However, I will keep moving because there will come a day where a man or women will need legal help and it will be my time to step up and get the job

Ethical Dilemmas are a pressing issue within any law enforcement or law agency the power that people have in positions such as these force them to share an equal or greater amount of reasonability. Ethics is defined as “the branch of philosophy that typically deals with values relating to human conduct with respect to the rightness and wrongness of certain actions and to the goodness and badness of the motives and ends of such actions”. This definition of ethics courtesy of Webster dictionary shows just how complex the intricacies of ethics are and how major dilemmas might negatively impact departments for instances lawyers are plagued with ethical dilemmas on a day to day basis such as Lawyer advocacy, conflict of interest, Professional

According to the Deputy Chief Justice, Dikgang Moseneke prior to the establishment of the Black Lawyers Association (BLA), African attorneys faced several indignities and challenges, for instance, for African lawyers “It was an offence to practise within “white” towns or cities.” African lawyers were made to use the rear entrance of the courthouse unlike their white colleagues who were permitted to use the front entrance, African lawyers were most likely to lose a case based on racial bias rather than poor performance. African and white lawyers were segregated in court and African lawyers were only permitted to address the court once seated in their designated areas. As a means of affirming their status as an attorney, African lawyers carried their admission certificates1 in

One of the defendants actually states “Hey you good, Why aint you become a real lawyer” (p. 138). They think because they are getting this for free that these people representing them don’t have any idea what they are doing because the one was so good at using the facts for his client is a good way he got him acquitted.

Public defenders have a tough job defending their indigent clients. In an ideal scenario, they are to defend their clients in a zealous manner. Unfortunately for the clients, most cases end via plea bargains . For cases that do make it to court, some clients find their attorney lacking in many respects . This is because the Supreme Court case Gideon v Wainwright only guarantees the right to an attorney. Unfortunately, that right does not extend to a quality lawyer or defense . I intern at the Orange County Public Defender’s office, where the clients are poor and homeless. As such, they cannot hire their own lawyers and must rely on free legal representation from the office’s attorneys. But just like other Public Defenders across the U.S.,

While the 6th amendment gives defendants the right for an effective assistance of counsel, that doesn’t always happen. When a defendant is convicted because of his lawyer’s mistake, the court must realize that there is no way justice could be service with no trust in the conviction and essentially implies that the charges would be reversed or thrown out. To prove a claim of ineffective assistance, the defendant must be able to show a lack of performance by his or her lawyer in court. You would then have to depict how that made the trial unfair in the courtroom. The courts would then look back and see if your defense attorney acted within reason and professional standards. In Strickland v. Washington (1984), David Washington was arrested for three capital murder charges. Washington pled guilty, but told the judge he was under extreme stress for supplying food on the table for his family. The judge expressed how he had a great deal of respect for people who owe up to the actions they do. During the preparation for Washington’s hearing, his defense attorney did not perform the proper background investigation he was suppose to perfume going into a murder hearing. As a resort from lack of investigation Washington was sentenced to death on three counts of murder. Washington fought back by appealing the court’s decision explaining that his lawyer’s performance was deficient, and that his lawyer’s

These crimes have been deemed particularly dangerous to society because they compromise the health, well being, privacy and protection of the people of any given jurisdiction. When these crimes are committed or a person or group is accused of such acts, legal representation is the next logical step to preserve the institution of justice, protect innocent parties, and prevent the innocent among the accused from prosecution. This is why it is important to find the right lawyer. Criminal defense in the form of an experienced attorney is critical to aligning evidence, witnesses, and countering the prosecutions arguments for the sake of their client's defense, case dismissal, acquittal, lessened sentencing or rehabilitation.

Justice. It is something that everyone wants, something that we strive for, even something that sparks. However, when we think of lawyers, we think of superheroes with an expensive education, walking into the courtroom and serving up justice. What no one thinks of is the person that helped the lawyer get there, the paralegal that prepares the necessary documents, the paralegal that makes sure his or her attorney is at the right place at the right time. A paralegal is crucial and in some cases vital to our justice system yet they are so often over looked.

There are two standards that must be proven; deficient performance by the attorney and resulting prejudice that if done differently would have proved a different outcome for the convicted. It is extremely problematic that defendants with the money to do so will achieve or exceed equality of representation with the State, while indigent defendants and those with modest means often will not. Your class should not determine the amount of fairness that you will receive during trial and ultimately your freedom. Gideon v. Wainwright made it unconstitutional to do this. but now we see problems with the system that was implemented to combat such unfairness in the justice system. The public defense system doesn’t guarantee that every time you have to utilize their services that you will get an attorney that will act in the best interest of you and this is a problem. There are people who are in jail or have a record because of the representation they were provided with by the State; this is not to shift all of the blame on the attorney because it is the system that needs fixing. When you have the means, you are at an advantage in the courtroom, and this is the exact opposite of the definition of “fair” and

The main argument introduced in the debate considers whether a practicing solicitor can adhere to the traditional values of moral and ethical integrity that have been reinforced through a set of principles such as the Solicitors Regulation Authority Code of Conduct (SRA). The latter consists of ten mandatory principles that are the professional requirements expected of any solicitor. Traditionally, ethical and moral truthfulness have formed the basis of a competent lawyer and thus when adhering to the traditional principles placed upon lawyers, a lawyer was thought to abide to moral standards. I will aim to tackle the debate by arguing that the SRA provides a framework that allows lawyers to be good people. Secondly, I will also be discussing a lawyer’s moral responsibility. and that whilst ‘The lawyer is conventionally seen as a professional devoted to his client’s interest and…required, to do some things for that client which he would not do for himself’ his moral responsibility must not violate the SRA Code of conduct. Finally, it is imperative to explore the ethical dilemmas solicitors face when attempting to make their clients’ interests their own.

that many may not be able to pay with cash and may have to take up a

The career I have chosen is to become a lawyer, in either a private practice or firm, or for the government. The definition of a lawyer is an advocate or advisor in society, that is as an advocate, to represent one of the opposing parties in a criminal or civil trial, and as an advisor to counsel clients as to their legal rights and suggest courses of action. But that is not all a lawyer is about. Being a lawyer takes hard work, dedication, and many years in school.

When it comes to large sums of money, it is not uncommon for the spender to feel they have been ripped off or become over protected. The practice of law is no exception to this phenomenon, and crocked lawyers and paralegals have negatively contributed to the notion. On several occasions law professionals have taken client money for personal use, acting against the law and rules of professional conduct. Although lawyers and paralegals have their own individual rules and guidelines to abide by, they follow the same professional structure of proper conduct. The rules of conduct for paralegals is governed by the Law Society of Upper Canada and is the governing body responsible for reports of misconduct. Further investigations will lay out the proper procedures and tasks that must be completed when a paralegal encounters an accusations of misconduct, specifically when a client accuses a paralegal of misappropriating money from the clients trust fund. When it comes to possible options it is important to remember that by proactively sending a report of the circumstance to the Law Society of Upper Canada with a detailed list of events, bookkeeping and accounts billed to the client will help your case prior to the client reporting you to the Law Society. Should a paralegal choose to ignore the threat of the client, in hopes that the client will not follow through with higher involvement, the paralegal will then face an audit by the Law Society. If the Law Society is apprised that the