The Uk Should Leave The European Union

The EU operates single market that allows for the free movement of people, goods, capital, and services between the twenty-eight member countries. The union has also been experiencing various problems such corruption and member countries threatening to leave the union due to some reasons that are best known to them. For instance, in recent times, England has been contemplating on leaving the union. Therefore, the paper will be focused on whether England should consider remaining in the EU from economic, environment, social and geo-political perspective.

Britain took a giant leap of faith when they decided to leave the European Union. Some might look at this decision being unprecedented as a good thing; but that’s exactly why it’s a bad thing. Britain needs the EU to survive, the same way that the EU needs Britain to thrive the way they do. The British exit from the European Union, or “Brexit” in short, is the name for the recently passed referendum involving the UK’s decision to part ways with the European Union. The vote took place on June 23, 2016 and passed. The decision to leave the European Union won by 52% to 48%. The vote was very close which raises an ample amount of concern. Contrary to what those 52% of voters believe, the decision to leave the EU was bad in many ways. Brexit now has the potential to yield devastating outcomes on the UK and every nation attached to them.

The European Union was founded in the wake of World War II, in the hopes of promoting trade between member nations, who would be unlikely to go to war with each other. It presently consists of 28 nations, with over 500 million citizens. [1] At its governing level, the Union is split into 7 bodies, each with varying responsibilities similar to the branches of the United States government. The EU has 3 additional branches to supplement the Executive, Judicial, and two Legislative branches. There is a Central Bank, an official Auditory branch to keep the Banking branch in check, and an advisory branch to decide the policies and overall direction of the EU. The laws, policies, and treaties enacted by the EU supersede those of its individual member nations, even if they are in direct contradiction to that nation’s laws. [2] The average

In the next year the people of the United Kingdom will get a chance to choose their countries’ fate: whether they should leave the European Union. What makes this important is that it would be the first country to leave the European Union in a time when other European countries are either in negotiation or planning to join. It would be a big deal as the United Kingdom is Europe’s third largest economy. As the people are about to vote on their future, there are concerns as what would be the economical, social, and political consequences. While some wonder what would the benefits be if the United Kingdom left. In this discussion I will explore the United Kingdom in the European Union and the political, economical, and social benefits and

In order to understand the significance of Brexit we must first look at the history of the European Union and

There are several benefits that Britain has been enjoying as a member country of EU. Besides that, there have also been problems that Britain has been facing due to its membership in the EU and that are why the country is contemplating on its move of trying to distance itself or rather itself from the EU. The first benefit that has been enjoyed is employment. According to the current statistics, the EU has over three million people or jobs that directly rely on Britain 's membership of the EU. For instance, if trade and investments fell post-Brexit, the some of these jobs would be lost, and if it would have happened the opposite, then there would have been the creation of new jobs. Another reason is that Britain’s economy has been booming mostly because most of its biggest trading partners are the EU member state countries mainly German and France. More than fifty percent of the Britain’s export goes to the EU countries besides that, the country’s membership allows the traders to control how the trading rules are drawn up. Over 1.4 Britons have also been able to move and live abroad in the EU, furthermore, the driving license issued by the UK government in all the member states of the EU. The European Union (EU) has played a crucial role in the fighting of crime in England. This has because the European arrest warrants cut out the need for long and complicated extradition procedures and thus, this has allowed the criminals

There has always been a debate concerning Britain’s relationship with the integration process which resulted in the division among those in favor of the Britain’s leaving the European Union and those who oppose it. According to Beloff and Beloff (1996), backing of Britain’s membership in the EU are associated with individuals who saw the possibility of economic benefits remaining in or the economic dangers that would take place from being left out or recently from socialists and members of the trade union who thought that Europe could be solicited to counter-balance the market philosophy of post 1979 British governments. These supporters are the pro-Europeans or pro-integrationists. On the other hand, are the anti-Europeans or Euro

The United Kingdom’s vote to leave the European Union has been an hotly politicized and debated topic. There are many nuanced social and economic consequences of the Brexit vote, and many major news outlets in America have generalized and exaggerated the decisions as a disaster. The intent of this paper is to more closely examine the implications and repercussions of the Brexit vote and to determine if the UK will potentially be more positively affected by the change than commonly believed. Research pertaining to the EEA member Norway and its non-member status in the EU, the foreign direct investments in the UK, and on immigration patterns and benefits in the country allow for a more detailed understanding of the possible advantages to the Brexit vote. The research presented below will explicate the likely consequences of the UK emerging as a separate entity, absolved from the limitations and economic responsibilities of the EU, and how the topics of trade, immigration, the EEA, and FDI’s suggest that perhaps the UK stands to gain economically from the vote.

There are pros and cons to every situation, every decision, in every aspect of life. And in this particular case, I’ll weigh in on whether the British will benefit from leaving the European union, opposed to staying or vice versa.

Winston Churchill called for the concept of a “kind of United States of Europe”, and with an ever-closer European Union both with tenacious economic and political ties, his call is materialising by the day. Though favoured by Churchill, the high European migrant levels and the erosion of Britain’s sovereignty has led to the questioning of the so-called ‘European super-state’. Britain voting ‘out’ on the 23rd. June would result in ‘Brexit’ and subsequently an end to free trade with its European counterparts. This would release her from the shackles of tariffs and quotas that are present for non-EU trade, leading to potential trade deals with Eastern countries such as China. Further to ones discussion with Britain being EUs second largest

On June 23rd of 2016, the United Kingdom (UK) voted in a referendum to leave the European Union (EU). This decision was met with both excitement and hostility. This conflict has many shades of grey, as so many different things happened all at once that need to be discussed. People from all over the world wonder about the future of the UK, whether more countries will attempt to follow in its footsteps and leave the European Union, or if the EU will remain strong and continue to exist as the source that unifies Europe.

Since the 2016 vote, the European Union and the United Kingdom has consistently quarrelled whether UK’s exit from the union will be “hard” or “soft.” As many political scientists have predicted, this leave will not be easy for either party. Not only will the European Union will lose the economic powerhouse the UK is, but the UK will lose the multitude of benefits, regarding trade, finance, free movement of people, etc., the EU membership affords. This loss poses the need to represent the interest of the UK and the EU. Although the state’s “soft” exit from the union could motivate other members to follow Britain, a more challenging leave could jeopardize the future of the European Union. It is in the best interest of both sides to make this

Leave: Britain’s links with the EU are holding back its focus on emerging markets – there is no major trade deal with China or India, for example. Leaving would allow the UK to diversify its international links.

Before going into the benefits and costs of Brexit, the article did not go far enough to mention why Britain wants to divorce itself from the European Union (EU), but it is essential to understand this by drawing reasons from in class material. After WW2, most

The main contribution the book is making is that the European Union can be easily understood by analysing each aspect of it. ‘The main argument of this book is that to help understand how the EU works, we should use the tools, methods and cross-systematic theories from the general study of government, politics and policy-making’ (Hix, 2005 p2). The book is split into different parts and each part assesses certain bits of the European Union, which is what this review will do. For example in one part, the focus is on the legislative branch of the European Union, the executive branch and the judicial branch. In another part the focus is on the political side of the European Union and looks at for example how the interests of citizens are represented to and throughout the European Union in addition to how democratic the