The United States Healthcare Industry

Universities stemmed some of the biggest medical advances in the health care industry amongst the world. The educational platform for the United States spells long term success for health care, by growing the next generation of top health care providers. In comparison Germany and Canada also are represented amongst the top 50 medical schools in the world, but lack any representation of the top 10 prestige rankings. On top of that, both other countries lack volume and opportunity to receive a valued medical education when compared to the United States.

In 1997 University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) merged its two public hospitals with Stanford’s two private hospitals. The two separate entities merged together to create a not-for-profit organization titled UCSF Stanford Health Care. The merger between the health systems at UCSF and Stanford seemed like a good idea due to the similar missions, proximity of institutions, increased financial pressure with cutbacks in Medicare reimbursements followed by a dramatic increase in managed care organizations. The first year UCSF Stanford Health Care produced a profit of $22 million, however three years later the health system had lost a total of $176 million (“UCSF-Stanford Merger,” n.d.). The first part of this paper will address reasons

The purpose of this paper is to conduct a comparative analysis between for-profit hospitals and not-for-profit hospital. It will discuss the characteristics of each as well as factors affecting the operations of both systems. Additionally, it discusses potential areas of improvement and some of the challenges associated with each relative to finance and operations.

Primary care is the backbone of many industrialized nations, but is the US one of them? Unfortunately, the answer is no. The US lags behind such developed nations in its accessibility of primary care by a huge difference. The United States healthcare system fails to ensure the timely preventative and primary care for its residents. The current estimates indicate that there is merely one physician for every 2,500 patients. Not only Medicare beneficiaries, but also privately insured adults struggle in accessing the right primary care physician at the right time. Moreover, maldistribution of physicians only exacerbates the problem, especially for those residing in health professional shortage areas (HPSA).15 Approximately, sixty-five million Americans live in designated primary care shortage areas.13 Such underserved population faces higher disease and death rates and health disparities that then result in higher rates of hospitalizations and emergency department visits—in other words, expensive medical bills.21 More governmental control on the geographic location of primary care physicians can be a first-step to fixing the shortage problem.

In evaluating the plans of the Leonard Williams Medical Center (LWMC) and its subsidiary business entity, the Williams Medical Services (WMS), the overall objective is to implement new technology in the form of an Electronic Medical Record (EMR) system in order to streamline workflow, provide safe and quality care for patients and remain competitive with other healthcare facilities in providing these components with the use of advanced technology. The implementation of an EMR is the desire of the physician group, WMS, who refuses to listen to

This paper strives to answer questions based on the case study “Emanuel Medical Center: Crisis in the Health Care Industry”. As excerpted directly from the case study, Mr. Robert Moen, Emanuel Medical Center (EMC) president and CEO, was experiencing a number of challenges in 2002. The medical center faced numerous challenges in its external and internal environment. First, EMC garnered an onslaught of negative attention for the “Haley Eckman incident” in which a young man, who happened to be a gang member, died within view of EMC’s Emergency Department (ED) medical personnel rendered no care and watched. The emergency department at EMC was also experiencing greater pressure to deliver services in an increasingly

The implementation of the EMR system has also had close ties with CVS, so that healthcare providers and CVS can work in collaboration on patient care. CVS highlights that they, “heightening our ability to provide collaborative care. We added 19 health

Prevailing astuteness supports the fact that working in U.S. health care field in the 21st Century call for familiarity of the countless facets of health laws as they relate to dealing with medical professionals. Further, because U.S. health care administrators have to hypothetically work together with many levels of specialists beyond the medical profession, it is judicious that they are aware of any federal, state, and local laws that may be appropriate to their organizations. Consequently, their manner is also subject to the letter of the law. They must assess the value of their professional collaborations and be watchful of the insinuations and consequences of their choices. As the top health administrator at the proposed Well Care Hospital in Happy Town. Upon being hired, there was a pre-employment screening that involved a background check that was administered to check and see if there were any violations of hospital medical misconduct during the last five years. With the hospital in the last six months being under scrutiny for breach of medical compliance there was some training that had to take place including training in personnel conduct, as well as in inter-employee conduct with medical staff, nurses, and technologists.

EmCare delivers excellent patients experience and always able to maintain their quality. They work through certain metrics to deliver their quality patient service such as:

There are millions of healthcare organizations all throughout our country. Some of these organizations have a significantly greater financial background than others, but that depends on the size, location, and demand of the patient population. The organization that is going to be discussed is Yale New Haven, which is a large hospital in southeast Connecticut. Their most recent data dates back to the fiscal year of 2014 when the hospital saw a total of 1.2 million patients, bringing in revenue close to 3.5 billion dollars. In fact, Yale New Haven has made close to a billion dollars more in revenue compared to the year of 2012. Without the help of the 6,000 medical personnel and the 20,000 members of the staff, this large hospital would never be as successful as it is today (Yale New Haven Health, n.d.). As one can see, the hospital is growing each and every year supplying the overall demand of the patient population.

Healthcare in the United States during the early 1900s through the World Wars would be described as “evolved”. The healthcare system has evolved from what healthcare used to be during the 1700s – 1800s; during this period, the healthcare system faced many challenges: lack of basic care available, high rate of mortality, disease epidemics and unhealthy living and working conditions. As we bypass this era, we’ve come to find that during the 1900s through the World Wars led to a more organized approach with technology and healthcare.

This is the essential concern of the human services industry as CBO estimates that PPACA incorporates diminishment in Medicare of over $700 billion amid the 2013-2022 period, principally through marginally decreasing the trajectory of using increments anticipated that former will PPACA. Singular recipients are not straightforwardly affected, the vast majority of the expense investment funds originates from diminishing future installments to healing facilities and other administration suppliers in respect to past benchmark gauges. Payroll expense base to 1.35%. Separated from these variables there are different difficulties, for example, diminishing inpatient volume, expanding expense for supplies and staff which can get greater because of insufficient subsidizing. Uninsured Americans are more averse to have general health awareness and use preventive administrations. They are more inclined to postpone looking for consideration, bringing about more restorative emergencies, which are more costly than progressing treatment for such conditions as diabetes and hypertension.

Harvard Pilgrim Health Care was recognized as one of the best medical assistance provider. They had one of the best team of professionals. They had simultaneously won many awards for their best services offered in clinical practices. By the 1990s, they were stuck in an eccentric dilemma. Harvard Pilgrim Health Care wanted to expand their services with the growing trends and getting their projects within time but they were not only short on human but financial resources as well. The healthcare industry was growing on a very fast pace and it required Harvard Pilgrim to grow with it but unfortunately they did not have enough resources that sealed their growth.

Though they are not entirely comprehensive tools, a great deal can be learned about a hospital or other healthcare organization for-profit or not-for-profit from an examination of their annual financial documents (Finkler & Ward, 2006). The balance sheet and statement of revenue and expense can both yield valuable clues even in the absence of other evidence about changes that might be occurring in the organization, a definition of the type and degree of certain problems that it might be facing, and potential opportunities for improvement in performance that might exist (Finkler & Ward, 2006). Comparing two or more years' worth of financial information yields even more valuable insights, tracking movement in the hospital or other organization's ability to finance its activities and thus continue providing services at the same level, quantity, and scope as current operation.

Healthcare industry is undergoing major changes both internally and externally. The change in paradigm is as a result of both social and technological advances that have current systems to adapt to keep up with the changes. With the constant challenge of always providing better and quality healthcare, current models have resulted in some dramatic changes that will have an effect in the long run. Some of the changes or trends in the future include smaller and integrated hospitals. Due to advancements in technology, medical studies have been made easier and more accurate, therefore, making it easier to prevent diseases instead of treating infected individual. Thus in the future there will be no need for hospitalization. Also, it is now easy to consult a doctor due to advances in communication thus, no need for hospitalization as a patient can be monitored at home (Ramendra et al., 2012).