The Universal Declaration Of Human Rights

“History doesn’t repeat itself, but it does rhyme.” as Mark Twain is often reputed to have said explains with much rhetoric that in fact history is not repeated in a sense that the same events happen over and over again, instead events embrace similar themes. The same concept of Mr. Twain’s history comparison can be brought in support of why the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) drafted in 1948 by the UN --an international agreement that dictates basic rights and undeniable freedoms in which all human beings are entitled to-- should be updated. After analyzing the Human Rights Treaty it was concluded that amending the UDHR should be considered because of advancements in the world, in main part due to globalization and

It was “solemnly” proclaimed that “The Universal Declaration of Human Rights [UNDHR] states a common understanding of the peoples of the world concerning the inalienable and inviolable rights of all members of the human family and constitutes an obligation for the members of the international community” . The UNDHR gave value to the term ‘human rights’, stressing the value of human dignity. However, the article also recognises the need for social order, Article 29 acknowledges that limits to these rights must be determined by law and can only be for the purposes of securing recognition and respect of others and to meet “the just requirements of morality, public order, and the general welfare in a democratic society”. Any restriction on these rights has to be justified as proportionate to the aims pursued by the restriction, for example, a police officer is justified in wielding a firearm against an individual deemed to be putting other lives in

At the core of society are the undeniable rights we are afforded as human beings. These rights are outlined in the United Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) as a way to protect each individual’s freedoms. Since its adoption sixty-seven years ago, society and its viewpoints have changed drastically (“The Universal Declaration of Human Rights”). Therefore, while at the time the intentions for this document might have been genuine to protect all people, they are no longer sufficient. The lack of inclusion in this document has led to the creation of documents such as the Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW).

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, article 11, states: "Everyone charged with a penal offense has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law in a public trial at which he has had all the guarantees necessary for his defense.” This is not the case for Tom Robinson. In Maycomb, we see a town divided. Most townsfolk cannot fathom the idea that Maycomb’s black residents are equal to its white ones. But others - Atticus, Miss Maudie, Judge Taylor - treat everyone equally, with respect, kindness, and reason. Yet it is not through these characters that we see Tom Robinson’s trial. We watch from the balcony through the eyes of the children - Scout, Jem, and Dill. We see them learn the law and the unwritten rules

Article 2 states that, “Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion…” During the Holocaust, Jews were selectively targeted because of their religion.They were forced to wear yellow stars on their clothing so that it would be easier for someone to identify them as someone of the Jewish religion. “Three days later, a new decree: every Jew had to wear the yellow star.” (Wiesel 11) Because of their religion, Jews lost many of their rights.

The United Declaration of Human Rights is an international document where the United Nation (1948) put together to commit to uphold, promote and protect the human rights of every individual. The united Nation proclaims that the UDHR has a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations, to the end that every individual and every organ of society, keeping this Declaration constantly in mind, shall strive by teaching and education to promote respect for these rights and freedoms and by progressive measures, national and international, to secure their universal and effective recognition and observance, both among the peoples of Member States themselves and among the peoples of territories under their jurisdiction. There are various ways that the United States can enhance its implementation of rights to our education system, media, and the workplace.

When a lot of people are murdered, kidnapped, robbed or imprisoned, it is very easy to point fingers when citizens are asked why their lives are the way they are. In Venezuela, all of these things happen, and everyone has the same answer when they are asked that question: “Thanks to the government”. According to a Washington Post article published in 2009, there are about 40 political prisoners in Venezuela. These prisoners vary from students who protested in marches to mid-aged men who criticized the government of Hugo Chavez. But they all have one thing in common, they wanted a change. They spoke their opinions, and were punished for it. Physically punished. According to a Reuters article “The Committee Against Torture said complaints included reports of beatings, burnings and electric shocks in efforts to obtain confessions”. In Venezuela, there are many different violations of the 30 articles addressed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. But I will specifically address Article 3: “Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person”. Article 5: “No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment”. And Article 9: “No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile”. I will address the unfair imprisonment of Leopoldo Lopez, a candidate for president who went to jail for “disrupting the peace” and the unfair imprisonment of my friend Marco Coello, who was put in jail and was tortured for

Human rigths is an essential component of a tolerant and individually satisfied society. They are created to defend people’s dignity, equality and liberty. However, for thousands of years people lived with no garanteed rights, until 1948, when United Nations adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. But is the Universal Declaration of Human Rigths really universal to all states and humans living in them? I am going to argue if Human Rights should or should not be unically adapted to different cultures, religions and beliefs.

A human right is an ethical choice and moral belief belonging to all humans regardless of traits, status, location, color, gender, or belief system. Making the connection to a universal law, the United Nations Rights High Commissioner explains these rights are, “guaranteed by law” and protected as “fundamental freedoms” (OHCHR, 2016). The Cambridge Dictionary defines privilege as “an advantage that only one person or group of people has” listing examples such as having a high social position or wealth (Cambridge Dictionary, 2016). Those deserving of healthcare, according to the first article of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, should go to all born free and equal. Using universal healthcare systems of other countries as examples, the U.S. should make healthcare a human right and a priority for all citizens.

Inception of Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) in 1948 influenced both global and national organisations to put human right issues in the legislations through different kinds of conventions, treaties, international and domestic laws. These treaties were designed to protect everyone’s rights. States had obligation to respect, protect and fulfil human rights of the population. Recently, there has been increased emphasis on sexual rights and most governments, activists are fighting for gay rights and protect people who are discriminated for their sexual orientation. In order to protect and prevent discrimination and violence some states have imposed aid conditionality to ensure that the rights of homosexuals are being respected and protected by the states and societies (Warwick, 2013). However, these states and organisations fail to address complexities in the local complex in countries that criminalize homosexual acts. Additionally, conditionality were imposed on states to give incentives or punish states that criminalize gay people. Furthermore, such efforts have potential to increase discrimination and violence of homosexuals and also limits impacts of local activists working on gay rights.

The International Community argues that the Sentencia 168-14 is in violation of international law. Upon analyzing the situation, it becomes clear that the DR is in violation of a number of international laws. I will outline a number of Articles of the United Nations Charter of Human Rights and attempt to show how the DR are or could be considered in violation of these laws.

Culture is an important part of society; culture is what binds people together and ties generations from one to the next. It is culture that separates one group of people from another, making them unique from each other and adding variety and beauty to the world. Many nations and peoples cite their traditions and culture as the bedrock of their society. They refer to traditional values as the moral fiber which holds their societies together. Culture is a good thing, when allowed to progress, but can be dangerous if followed blindly. Culture can oppress minorities and those who don’t fit the traditional mold of a people. Culture can impede progress and leave women, minorities and other sub-sects of a society without the basic human rights

The women of Afghanistan are experiencing human rights violations. The Afghan government has been making efforts to give girls an education since 2001, but efforts failed and now 85 percent of Afghan girls don't attend school. Liesl Gerntholtz, a women's rights director at Human Rights Watch says, “The Afghan government and donors made bold promises in 2001 to get all girls into education, but insecurity, poverty, and displacement are driving many girls out of school” (Afghanistan 1). The lack of education violates Article 26 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. This article says, “ You have the right to go to school.” (Article 26). Meanwhile, the girls of Afghanistan are

On December 10, 1948, the United Nations General Assembly proclaimed the Universal Declaration of Human Rights “a common standard of achievement for all nations and peoples” (UN General Assembly, 1948). The Universal Declaration of Human Rights includes thirty separate articles, each articulating a distinct and inalienable human right. Article 4 prohibits slavery, Article 5 prohibits torture, Article 13 articulates the right to freedom of movement, and so on (UN General Assembly, 1948). 193 of the 195 countries recognized by the United States State Department are UN members and by virtue of UN membership, all 193 consent to upholding the standards determined the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, human rights abuse nevertheless persists.

Since it’s separation from India in 1947, Pakistan steadily grew to a country with a population of about 184.35 million people in 2013, making it the sixth most populous country in the world (“About Pakistan”). Pakistan is broken into four provinces: Punjab, Sindh, Balochistan, and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (“About Pakistan”). Its capital is the city of Islamabad. While Pakistan has taken many steps to improve the state of its people in recent years, the prevalence of poverty, gender inequality, inequities, political instability and a struggling economy have proved very challenging for the country (“About Pakistan”). These factors also