The University College Newcastle 's Plan Guides Preparedness, Response, And Recovery Actions

event of a catastrophic disruption (fire) or disaster (hurricane) and a major IT or data center outage occurs

Tragic events that cause damage to property and life may destroy the social, cultural and economic life of a community. Communities must be engaged in the various phases from prevention to recovery to build disaster resilient communities. In order to do this, there must be a disaster preparedness plan in place that involves multiple people in various roles.

Having these plans in place give the Disaster Recovery team the instructions they need when disaster strikes

mitigate these points assessments will be made in how to best mitigate the failure and what would need to be done to

The presentation will cover several areas dealing with the university’s ability to prepare for an emergency or catastrophic event. The areas covered include:

Planning for recovery will be implemented at the same time local governments are taking the emergency response actions necessary to protect the public. Preparations will be made for rapid deployment of resources necessary to facilitate

The Policy was detailed and thorough, making it possible for employees to begin recovering data as soon as a data center becomes operational. The backup schedule was followed, resulting in no loss to proprietary data. The ability to recover data means that very little funds will need to be spent on research that has already previously been accomplished. These funds can be used to recovery other physical assets, and be put to use in developing a more robust Disaster Preparedness Plan.

Editor’s Note: This Chapter is the continuation of an adaptation of a state plan for disaster preparation and response. In total, the original chapter comprises Chapters 1, 14, 16-18.

Additionally, the preparation phase covers all fundamentals of an incident response plan, reports interaction among basics, and increases to emergency response planning at some point in the life of an incident in order to develop the necessary trust relationships that will be fully exercised during the stress of a real crisis. According to Whitman (2012) “The Disaster Recovery Plan Similar in structure to the IR plan, the DR plan provides detailed guidance in the event of a disaster. It is organized by the type or nature of the disaster, and specifies recovery procedures during and after each type of disaster. It also provides details on the roles and responsibilities of the people involved in the disaster recovery effort, and identifies the personnel and agencies that must be notified. Just as the IR plan must be tested, so must the DR plan, using the same testing mechanisms.” (P. 231). Many of the same principles of incident response apply to disaster recovery such as fundamentals must be clearly established, roles and responsibilities must be visibly outlined, someone must initiate the alert schedule and notify key personnel, someone must have the responsibility of the documentation of the disaster and only if it is possible, attempts must be made to moderate the impact of the disaster on the operations of the organization.

Of the three Systems/Application Domain risks, threats, and vulnerabilities identified, which one requires a disaster recovery plan and a business continuity plan to maintain continued operations during a catastrophic outage?

Provision of services can be disrupted in the event of systems failure, compromised security or other advanced technologies. However, the result in downtime and resources can be minimized following a disaster recovery plan (DRP), effective immediately. To achieve this, policies and procedures must be formally established and reviewed periodically, beginning with the current ‘binder(s)’. The recent compromise, exposed the company to great risk, and furthermore, exploited existing vulnerabilities. Nevertheless, it is recommended, all current documentation be given an update of “no less than once every three years” (GFOA 2010, p. 1). A team or committee should be assembled in the case of emergency. In this manner, iPremier will be able to effectively engage in response to unforeseen circumstances. It is clear no formal communications were established much less responsibility were properly assigned while an attack was underway. The GFOA (2010) suggests as a minimum requirement, a (DRP) should outline the responsibilities of team members who are current and in contact. Ross (2010) agrees with this practice, suggesting the existence of (DRP)’s have proper trained staff with specified roles for emergencies.

Disasters weather man-made, natural, or technological are ineluctable. Community stakeholders, leaders, and citizens are ultimately culpable for ensuring that a sound disaster preparedness and recovery plan is in place should a calamity materialize. Failure to enact such a plan comes with immeasurable consequences. Over the discourse of this paper, the Banqiao Dam disaster will be examined as a case analysis, to render what preparedness and recovery plans were sanctioned, as well as the scope of the response effort.

Whitman, M. E., Mattord, H. J., & Green, A. (2014). Principles of incident response & disaster recovery.

2. Situational Assessment. Once the Incident Commander arrives on the scene, s/he will need to assess the emergency quickly. Is there still a threat to the general population? Are the casualties identified or does Search & Rescue need to be mobilized? The IC needs to come up with a game plan to save lives, protect property and the environment, meet basic human needs, and stabilize the situation. 5

In the event of a natural disaster, the team will follow the company’s disaster recovery plan.