The Us Strategy For Winning The Global War On Terrorism

Terrorism is an undoubtedly real concept that has left its mark on the 21st century in quite a profound way. That being said the topic of terrorism is both one of reality and conspiracy, not to debate the merits of its authenticity but rather the way in which governments respond to such unforeseen attacks. Many theorists have argued that the so-called war on terrorism is simply a political ruse; a political tactic used by western democracies to justify their engagement in ulterior motives abroad. When the Bush administration declared a universal “war on terrorism” after the events of 9/11 occurred, the entire approach of the western world towards the subject altered. Harsher laws, stricter security regulations and calculated conventional warfare tactics became priority. To engage in the discussion of whether the war on terror is in fact winnable is an extremely subjective argument, since it cannot be eradicated in a purely conventional sense, as small victories ensue but the overall war rages on. Terrorism is an unfortunate and undeniable reality that Canada has come to comprehend, the west is no longer a safe haven isolated from the reaches of radicalism. Canada not being a nation completely immune from the influences of terrorism has had to respond to threats by implementing additional criminal laws and policies to ensure the preservation of peace and security both domestically and abroad. Subsequently, with Canada being a nation built on the rule of law it is extremely

Presidents have sent troops to different places all over the world for various reasons. They’ve been doing it for years. Some missions have been called back and others have stayed to fight. It all has depended on what congress has decided. On October 7th, 2001, The War on Terrorism in Afghanistan began.

The beginning of “The War on Terror”. “The appeal of justice and liberty in the end, is greater than the appeal of hatred and tyranny in any form.”(Bush).Bush’s comment was referring to “The War on Terror” because he was in presidency during this year so this quote said by him means that he wants freedom for everyone.The solution to the “U.S.’s War on Terror” is ITA researchers, Antiterrorism Assistance Program, The Institute for the Study of War and The Critical Threats Project.

What is United States counter terrorism strategy? Counter terrorism strategies can be is done in many different ways and on many different locations around the world. The United States and many other countries have issues with home grown terrorism. How does homegrown terrorism change our countries counter terrorism strategy. Why is Hybrid terrorism important to the efforts of removing terrorism and deterring terrorism in the future? Major events have affected our counter terrorism strategies over the years; September 11, 2001 was a major terrorist attack in our countries history transformed our counter terrorism strategy to what it is today. What was Khobar Towers and what exactly happened, and why is it important in our counter terrorism

The National Strategy for Counterterrorism (2011) states, “U.S. CT efforts require a multi-departmental and multinational effort that goes beyond traditional intelligence, military, and law enforcement functions… These efforts must also be complemented by broader capabilities, such as diplomacy, development, strategic communications, and the power of the private sector” (p. 2). On the surface, this statement seems robust and portrays an effort to use every aspect of our national power, however, it’s equally vague and the strategy as a whole lacks measurable goals that can be used to evaluate its effectiveness. The question is, what kinds of data and evidence should we used to evaluate whether or not the current U.S. strategy for counterterrorism

The September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks have represented the end of the warfare system built in the aftermath of the Second World War. On the other hand, the tough US reaction culminated in the creation of a new order shaped by the terrorist threat and characterized by the so-called “war on terror”: an unprecedented way of doing politics and conducing conflicts. This scenario brought new challenges and perils to the legal framework aimed at regulating the relationships within international actors: international law, international humanitarian law and human rights law. New tendencies on behalf of States jeopardize the international system as a whole.

The United States of America irrefutably remains a superpower in the current era. The country is capable of influencing, to some degree, every part of the world. It is also afforded a myriad of political avenues in which to shape this influence. Those avenues can be broken down into 4 categories; Diplomatic, Informational, Military, and Economic (DIME) means. Effectively using these means, either separately or in combination, is a calculated effort driven by the highest levels of American government in pursuit of goals laid out in the National Security Strategy (NSS). The incorrect use of DIME elements to achieve those goals can render the overall effort ineffective, or in some cases, counterproductive. The May 2010 NSS includes

The Global War on Terror, or War on Terror, with the United States at the helm, is the second most expensive war in American history, having surpassed $2 trillion. At the same time, little has been accomplished for domestic security or the destruction of terror groups. The United States needs a clear, focused strategy to suppress terrorist groups, while at the same time eliminating the causes for terrorism. I propose a gradual drawdown and closing of US bases and garrisons around the world. I also propose a serious global coalition to tackle ISIS, with a clear plan and exit strategy. At the same time, negotiating an agreement cannot be overlooked.

A third and final social issue that has been going on since the beginning of the 21st is the war against terror. The “war on terror” has been going on since September. 11, 2001. The campaign of president George W. Bush “declared a worldwide ‘ war on terror ’ "(www.globalpolicy.org,2016). Since then this war has claimed “over 6,000 US soldiers killed in wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Possibly 100 times that number of civilians in those countries (in Iraq, at an early point, there was an estimated range of 400,000 to 900,000 civilian deaths”(Shah, 2013). This has made the war against terror a very difficult thing to deal with. Over 35 countries are a part of this war on terror. Including America, Afghanistan, Iraq, and Egypt.

Global terrorism has been increasing problem since the end of the Cold War. With conditions favorable to terrorist organizations like Al-Qaeda and ISIS, global terrorism started to take rise when the Russians withdrew from Afghanistan. Due to the war on terror, there have been many tragic events like 9/11. As the world keeps advancing to newer and more advanced technology, so will ISIS. Therefore, we will need to arm ourselves with the knowledge of why terrorism is important to us as a society and how much damage terrorism is actually doing to us by looking at past history, current events, and the future of terrorism. To know more about terrorism, we first need look into past events and realize how much damage terrorism has already done to

As a matter of fact, since September 11, ‘Civilization’ has been evoked to justify the revenge on both the Al Qaeda network and those who harbored it in Afghanistan. Identifying terrorism as the enemy of civilization provides an enormous scope for US intervention overseas as well as sanctioning the Federal Government’s curtailment of civil liberties at home. Furthermore, Bush put the attacks of 9/11 in religious terms, he declared that ‘this crusade, this war on terrorism is going to take a while’ and also in civilizational terms ‘this is civilization’s fight.’

This 2015 National Military Strategy addresses the need to counter revisionist states that are challenging international norms as well as violent extremist organizations (VEOs) that are undermining transregional security. We are working with allies and partners to deter, deny, and – when necessary – defeat potential state adversaries. Concurrently, we are leading multiple coalition efforts to disrupt, degrade, and defeat VEOs. Central to these efforts is strengthening our global network of allies and partners. This integrated strategy requires us to conduct synchronized operations around the globe, implement institutional reforms at home, and sustain the capabilities, capacity, and readiness

In the fight against global terrorism, the United States has emerged as the leader in the fight against transnational terrorism due to its standing as world’s lone superpower and the fact big target for attacks by terrorist groups. However, with that being said as powerful as the United States is and with as many resources that it has at its disposal it to fight terrorism it still needs help from others. Nation states that are in regions were terrorists wreak or have terrorist activity within their own borders are in a situation in which they would be able to help the United States in a substantial way by providing a great deal of information and partnering up with the United States in the fight against terrorism. However, there are nations

After the events of September 11, 2001, the United States had a unique dilemma. America was engaged in what would be called a “War on Terror”. This new conflict was unlike any in American history. Previously, in the context of war the United States had always fought a nation or group that had defined boundaries as to where they resided. This new conflict went away from these rules of the past. Terrorist groups were not bound to a region, but were instead united by an ideal. September 11 marked the first time in which terrorism would rise to the forefront of the nation’s agenda. This emergent wave of conflict required a different strategy than the those of the past because of the unorthodox nature of the opponent. One of the major innovations fostered by the “War on Terror” was the expansion of torture. The dramatic rise in terrorism sparked the unethical advancement of interrogation techniques in order to more effectively acquire information. The emergence of the “War on Terror” required government officials acquire intelligence in a new way thus spawning the emergence of “enhanced interrogation” methods, however, the morality of these techniques would come into question as they were revealed to the public.

The world has been changed forever since the tragic attack on September 11, 2001. An observer described the atrocity by saying, "It just went 'bam,' like a bomb went off. It was like holy hell (CNN 1). " The new world will be different from what any American has known before. A new war has arisen, not against a foreign country or a major region of the world, but rather against a select group of people who have the capabilities to destroy the lives of so many. The war against terrorism which the United States is now forced to wage will not be an easily won battle. This war will not be fought solely on scattered battlefields in certain countries. It will instead permeate through every aspect of life as we