The Use Of Research On Cosmetics And Its Effects On Society

Millions of animals every year are being used in labs to test cosmetics. This problem has become a worldwide issue and the U.S. needs to make a change by prohibiting the use of animals in testing cosmetics for safe use.

While some have heard stories of animal testing, many are oblivious to how harsh the effects of the testing are. Ensuring the safety of makeup and other beauty products is definitely important, but the tests used today are inhumane and ineffective, but it is in the hands of the beauty industry to make the changes necessary to end it. Cosmetic companies should refrain from testing on animals because the tests are no longer necessary and they inflict unneeded pain on animals.

Everyday cosmetic products that many people use, such as lipsticks, shampoo, face wash, etcetera, are verified to be safe using animal testing. Chemical burns and other short term ailments are very serious concerns that plague Americans and the knowledge that the products they use will not harm them and their families is possible because of animal testing. Also long term effects, such as cancer, have been discovered through animal product testing and promptly stopped saving countless lives. “NOT TESTED ON ANIMALS YOU’RE THE GUINEA PIG” (Source C). Living day to day with the risk that the products trusted to use on your children and yourself is enough to validate

Every year about 241,000 rabbits are tortured in United States laboratories to test for the effects that household products, such as cosmetics, dishwashing liquid, and drain cleaner will have on their eyes ("Rabbits in Laboratories | PETA.org." 1). Scientists will drip chemicals into the eyes of the animal to see how much irritation it will cause, a process known as the Draize eye irritancy test ("Rabbits in Laboratories | PETA.org." 1). The test is certainly not pain free; it often causes distress, such as redness, swelling, and sometimes blindness. After the rabbits are finished being toyed with, they are killed ("Rabbits in Laboratories | PETA.org." 1). The Draize eye irritancy test is just one of the thousands of examples of profuse

Animal testing is cruel and inhumane. According to Humane Society International, animals used in experiments are commonly subjected to force feeding, forced inhalation, food and water deprivation, prolonged periods of physical restraint, the infliction of burns and other wounds to study the healing process, the infliction of pain to study its effects and remedies, and "killing by carbon dioxide asphyxiation, neck-breaking, decapitation, or other means." [47] The Draize eye test, used by cosmetics companies to evaluate irritation caused by shampoos and other products, involves rabbits being incapacitated in stocks with their eyelids held open by clips, sometimes for multiple days, so they cannot blink away the products being tested. [48][49] The commonly used LD50 (lethal dose 50) test involves finding out which dose of a chemical will kill 50% of the animals being used in the experiment. [65][102] The US Department of Agriculture (USDA) reported in 2016 that 71,370 animals suffered pain during experiments while being given no anesthesia for relief, including 1,272 nonhuman primates, 5,771 rabbits, 24,566 guinea pigs, and 33,280 hamsters. [121]

In this article, Christine Stevens talks about a few tests that used on animals. Without holding back she describes the procedures and it is enough to make a person cringe. She explains the LD-50 test which requires that exactly half of the animals die. Another test that is explain is the Draize Test, which is when test substances are dropped in the conjunctival sac of conscious rabbits. The article also sheds light on how animal salesmen have taken advantage of the testing, always trying to make a profit. I am going to use this article because it gives significant examples of the negative size of animal testing.

For many years there has been a controversial debate on whether or not animals should be used as test subjects for human cosmetics. The debate has two major sides Pro-animal testing and Anti-animal testing. Both sides have many valid points and this is one of the major reasons the debate is still ongoing many years after it began. The Pro- animal testing side argues the usefulness of animal testing for ensuring the progression and comfort of human development. The Anti-animal testing side argues that not only is animal testing unreliable, it is also cruel and unnecessary. While there is a plethora of reasons animal testing should be banned, the three primary reasons are it is unreliable and incompatible with humans, it is cruel and harsh for

Annually, one hundred to two hundred thousand animals suffer and possibly die due to testing for cosmetic reasons. (5) Animal testing was invented in the 1930’s when scientific technology wasn’t as advanced. Since then, cruel and painful tests have been performed on animals to test cosmetics. (1) Technology and science are more advanced now and alternative testing sources have become available. However, cosmetic companies continue to use animal testing for cosmetics even though it is outdated and unreliable. While animal testing is banned in some countries, some believe that it should be illegal for cosmetic companies worldwide to use animal testing. Not only is it is cruel and painful to the animals, reactions on animals may not be the same

Every year millions of animals are tested on and poisoned. “The term "animal testing" refers to procedures performed on living animals for purposes of research into basic biology and diseases, assessing the effectiveness of new medicinal products, and testing the human health and/or environmental safety of consumer and industry products such as cosmetics, household cleaners, food additives, pharmaceuticals and industrial/agro-chemicals.” (Humane Society International, 2016). Many animals are forced to inhale toxic fumes and take harmful chemicals in hope for scientists to know the outcome those products will have on humans. This is now proven that even though it may not be harmful for an animal it still may be for humans so it is a pointless attempt to help us, in the long run and killing many of helpless animals in the meantime. Makeup, cosmetics, household products and many more are the harmful things we test on animals to make sure it is “safe” for our use. More animals than you think are being tested by these terrible chemicals such as mice, fish, rats,

Every year, it is estimated that hundreds of millions of animals are used for experiments worldwide (Cohn). In those millions, an estimated 100,000 to 200,000 animals are used to test cosmetics alone (Humane). Scientists shouldn’t be allowed to test cosmetic products on animals because it is cruel and inhumane, there are other effective alternative methods, and it isn’t necessary.

Millions of animals are being unneedlessly tested on for cosmetics, even though there are plenty of alternatives available and most of the results are unreliable or not applicable to humans. Although the fight against animal testing has made huge progress recently, America has yet to stop this cruel practice and chooses to torture animals while other countries are making a stop to the testing (“Animal Testing 101”).

Many people believe that animal testing for cosmetic products and substances should not be banned completely. The ECO Friendly Blog writes, “testing cosmetics on animals before introducing them to the public is needed for the process, or people would be exposed to products that are potentially harmful” (“Pros and Cons in Cosmetic Animal Testing” par. 4). This suggests that if you don’t test cosmetic products on animals it puts the lives of humans at risk every time the product or substance is being used. Without cosmetic animal testing, the products and substances could cause humans to experience severe health complications and or death. Nonhuman animals are used for cosmetic experimentation to ensure the safety of substances for the consumer

Imagine being locked in a cage and sent to a cold, dull lab to be probed at just so someone could test their product to ensure someone else’s safety. Every day animals are being used as experimental dummies for advances in scientific research, cosmetics, and medical developments. Cosmetics are tested for “human safety” at the expense of an innocent animal’s health and even worse, it’s life. In the United States, millions of animals are killed for animal experimentation every year. Animal testing is unnecessary, inhumane, and needs to be banned by the United States government and replaced with alternative methods of research.

Each year 26 million animals are used in animal research. Many of these animals suffer and even die from this cruel research method (ProCon.org). These helpless animals are caged, tortured, and only handled for the research and testing of the ingredients in our personal care products. Even more alarming, this treatment of animals is not illegal or banned. It has actually been the norm for several cosmetic companies in the United States for decades. This is not right nor is it fair. Animal testing for the use of cosmetics should be banned in the United States because there are a significant number of alternatives to animal testing. Furthermore, the use of animals for cosmetic testing is inhumane and unnecessary.

The efficacy and ethical issues of animal experiments on cosmetics are constantly controversial. Today, the rights of animals and the cruelty of animal experiments are on the global scene, and there are more and more organizations supporting the movement against animal experiments. Every year, millions of animals are suffering and dying from painful tests to determine the safety of cosmetics. Materials such as eye shadow and soap have been tested in rabbits, rats, guinea pigs, dogs, and other animals despite the fact that the test results do not prevent or treat human illness or injury. Cosmetics do not need to be tested on animals and there are alternatives that are not animals. It is difficult to understand why some companies are still continuing these cruel and inhumane tests. Like cosmetics, many animals are dying to use animals safely in the laboratory. In recent years there have been various alternatives to using computer simulation, bacterial studies and biochemical analysis, but animal experiments still do not show signs of decline. Do they have to continue animal testing for humans?