The Use Of Testing On Animals Is Inhumane

In our ever-changing world the race to find the best technological advancements has never been higher. Progress within the medical field has changed drastically in the last 50 years. “Health is driven by the technologies that cure the unhealthy. These technologies need to advance along with an advancing society. In the last five decades new and improved, less expensive, medicine has been produced” (Leonard). Behind all this advanced medicine are the technologies, or creatures, that are used to test and improve the medicine. Animals are used to test the drugs and medicine that are in route to be produced for human use. “The term "Animal Testing" refers to procedures performed on living animals for purposes of research into basic biology and diseases, assessing the effectiveness of new medicinal products” (Humane Society). There are people who side with, and agree that animal testing improves the lives of humans, and there are individuals who believe the harm this research brings to animals is unreasonable and can be prevented.

As of 2015, 200 to 225 million animals are said to used in laboratory research for the biomedical industry annually worldwide. Typically defended by arguments of reliability and human health benefits, recently the question of ethics and values placed on animal testing have caused it to become a relevant and pressing topic that has been more widely discussed and debated. First off, the laboratory conditions that are instigated upon millions of animal models for the sake of medical research has been said to be unethical and cruel. Additionally, it has been debated that the results of animal experimentation are unreliable across a wide range of areas. Lastly, animal testing not only leads away from the direction of resources from more effective testing methods but also prolongs the duration of time humans may need to wait for an effective cure. Therefore, the potential benefits of animal experimentation are greatly outweighed by the risks and collective harm of humans and animals which is why resources should be directed towards more human-based testing procedures.

Just in the United States, “there are about 26 million different species, from dogs to birds, being used every year for medical and science related testing” (“Animals in Science / Research”). Throughout the process of testing, “monkeys are addicted to drugs, cats are deafened and have holes drilled into their skulls, sheep and pigs have their skin burned off, and rats have their spinal cords crushed” (“Animals in Medical Experiments”). As a result, animals face cruel conditions and have no way of fighting back. Although medical testings on animals may cure the deadliest diseases such as cancer and tuberculosis, the abuse and mistreatment these animals face while testing medicines should be deemed inhumane, and such practices should be banned in the United States.

Americans have been using animals since the famous Greek doctor Galen (AD 129-200) studied animals. William Harvey used animals 400 years ago to discover how blood circulated through the body. Many medical advances have been made using animals. The “modern” era of animal research started about 150 years ago. People think that animal testing is inhumane and cruel, and it used to be. In the beginning it was very different then it is today, there were no anesthetics or effective pain killers. The animals involved with animal testing in the beginning did suffer a great deal because of it. Today luckily the animals used in animal testing have pain killers and anesthetics available to them. The only people who can tests and research on animals are licensed to do so. They have special facilities that are used to conduct the tests and research. Everything that has to do with tests and research has to go through a process in which they have to pass. If they don’t pass the standards they don’t get to do research there. Americans should be for animal testing because it protects the safety of people, animals, and the environment. Without animal testing the medical advances we have today would not be possible.

This is not an accurate reality of modern animal testing, which is a highly regulated industry. Unfortunately, many feel that the regulations in place are not enough, and seek to place an outright ban on animal testing altogether. Medical research on animals should not be forbidden by law because it is already highly regulated for the protection of animals, there are currently no adequate alternatives, and the practice has been essential to the development of numerous life-saving

Following along, testing on animals is inhumane, and animal testing, an unbearable act, is universally unwanted by all. Not just animal lovers peering in through the outside disapprove or have a disliking for the tests, but also those from within (and not just the animals) have a distaste for the tests too. Animal testing may hope to advance humans (and lifestyles), whilst preventing or delaying deaths and unnecessarily assuring a cosmetic’s safety, but (ironically) at the expense or reverse of other species. If the animals tested on in the United States were all from just one generally beloved species, such as canines (or even people), then there would be an outrage and atrocity, but there is a preference over which species get tested upon and which do not-quite hypocritical. Chimps are humanity’s closest living relative, sharing 98% to 99% of DNA, and as of September 14th, 2015, testing on them has been illegal in the United States (after being declared an endangered species). In "Fighting cancer: Animal research at Cambridge," Professor Gerard Evans pronounces that working with orgasms that are more alike to humans, than mice, is possible, but experimenting and testing on such organisms would (further) raise issues or questions, as they, such as primates, may be or are of measurable intelligence (among other considerations). In “Fighting cancer: Animal research at Cambridge,” Professor Gerard Evans also denotes, “Mice are relatively easy to breed and maintain and keep

Antibiotics for infections, chemotherapy for cancer, and insulin for diabetes have been made possible through testing and research performed on animals. Through extensive research and time, scientists have provided people with new diagnostics, treatments, and even cures. The world would be living without these medical advancements if it weren’t for animal testing. Furthermore, animal testing is the most popular and sufficient way for scientists to progress in their research. Human testing is unethical and risky with new treatments and drugs. That’s why it’s important for experimenting to be continued on animals. Animal testing research provides necessary experiments to modify treatments and advancements in healthcare for

The practice of commercial testing on animals is cruel and inhumane. “Animals that are used in testing are supposed to have proper housing, treatment, veterinary care, food and water,” according to the federal Animal Welfare Act (AWA). Almost 97% of the animals that scientists use for testing are not protected under the AWA. That is almost all of them! Animals are just like babies: defenseless, living, breathing. If we test on animals, we could test on babies just the same, right?

Humanity has a long history of experimentations on animals, especially in the medical and cosmetic field. “Each year, 26 million animals in the United States are used for animal testing” (United States Department of Agriculture). Many people argue that humanity would not be where it is today if people did not rely on animal testing. However, many other people believe that animal experimentation is not necessary and leads to the suffering and death of millions of animals. People on both sides debate whether animal testing should be carried out at all. Nevertheless, despite the belief that animal testing is beneficial, testing animals is actually immoral and should be abandoned.

While many people see animal testing as a necessity, there are a few that stop to consider the truth. Though animals are different from people, they still have feelings. As people know how pain feels, it’s the same for animals. Animals may be for legged, furry creatures, but they are not immune to pain. They can tell what’s going on, even though people refuse to believe it. While they feel pain, it may be for no reason; scientists and animal advocates have voiced their concerns on how animals are not reliable for research. People and animals have different chemical make-up and the results of animal testing has hindered progress. What is not safe for animals,

Primarily, animal research is a necessary element to the health of humans. People against animal testing do not realize how much the populace relies on this trustworthy way of studying life. Omnipresent, animal testing is in almost every product or drug out on the market. Each drug, treatment, medical device, or cure has developed with the help of lab animals. In 1937, a toxic medicinal drug called ‘Elixir Sulfanilamide’ was not tested on animals; It killed

Today in a modern world of medical marvels, it may seem cruel and primitive to continue to test products on animals. After all, isn’t it rather selfish to use animals for experiments? Some would say so. However, although some argue that there are better alternatives, animal testing is necessary because it has made safe medication available to the ill, and it’s required to uphold human rights.

From the soap we use to wash our hands to the newest drug therapy on the market, many people do not think about how products are formulated for their safety and benefit. Using animals for these experimentations usually does not come to mind. Animals are often abused, suffer, and even die during laboratory testing for the benefits of people to make sure medications, household products, newest procedures, and cosmetics are safe and effective for human use. Humans have benefited from animal testing for years while these animals suffer consequences with no positive outcomes for themselves. Even if a product or procedure is deemed successful, these animals are frequently euthanized due to mutations and other effects from experimentations that are inflicted upon them. Even though this is a traditional method of creating products and new procedures, animal testing should be prohibited because it is inhumane, is not guaranteed to predict beneficial outcomes, and there are many reliable, yet cost effective alternatives available that do not utilize animals.

It is estimated that over one hundred million animals are killed each year because of animal testing. The term “Animal Testing” refers to experimentation which takes place before human clinical trials to determine the dosing, toxicity, and efficacy of products for humans. This includes animals being tested for medical research, cosmetic products, and curiosity-driven experimentation. Many times this leads to animals being treated inhumanly and has led to serious controversy in whether or not animal testing is actually effective. In fact, many studies show that testing animals is not a direct analogy for impacting humans, it also kills an unprecedented amount of animals, and throughout the years scientists have found alternative methods for creating beneficial products for humans.

Just in the United States there are about 26 million different species, from dogs to birds, being used every year for medical and science related testing. Throughout the process of testing, these animals face cruel conditions and have no way of fighting back. Although medical testings on animals may cure the deadliest diseases such as cancer and tuberculosis, the abuse and mistreatment these animals face while testing medicines should be deemed inhumane, and such practices should be banned in the United States.