The Use Of The Vessel Sealer Builds On The Co2 Environment

In this chapter, Rugierri discusses robotic-assisted surgeries. Although these robots might be considered break through technology, their cost to use them is extravagant and less than ideal. Regardless of the operation, “robotic minimally invasive surgery costs more than traditional laparoscopic surgery or open surgery. Study after study has shown that using robotics can add approximately 20 percent (anywhere from $2,000 to $4,000) more to an operation.” At first when reading this, I thought this cost could be justified for having a better outcome than traditional surgeries. Reading further I found that there was another study that produced results concluding, “there was no difference in outcomes between robotic and traditional laparoscopic, the robot added $3,000 more per (colon) operation, and, if universally adopted, robotic-assisted surgery would add billions of dollars to our national healthcare tab.” I found this study information to be very interesting in that it seems illogical for the government, or individual hospitals even, to approve of the use of robotics when the extra cost isn’t justifying anything. When there are competent, hard-working surgeons available at a lower cost than robots, why not continue to rely on our surgeons and keep national healthcare costs as low as

In today's world there is a tremendous amount of information on the internet; it is our duty as the target audience to be meticulous in choosing which sites we decide to commit to. For example The Society of Thoracic Surgeon or STS my sound professional but you cannot assess a website solely by the name at the top of the web page. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons web page can be found at http://www.sts.org/ and noting the .org is a promising sign but diving deeper into the site itself. STS is a non-profit organization that is committed to ensuring patients receiving surgeries of the heart, lung esophagus and others related to the chest are getting the best possible outcomes (The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, 2014). According to O'Leary (2010) using an academic database can promote an end result of finding a credible website. In finding the domain, www.sts.org, MedlinePlus was the chosen database for this search. With the information at hand I knew this website was worthy of my time for further evaluation.

Imagine a place where robots can not only decrease mistakes, but it can also save many lives during dangerous and high risk surgeries. I have had friends and family have these procedures done, and it was helpful and successful. Telerobotic surgeries are helpful, it prevents less to no mistakes, less deaths, and makes procedures easier.

Included in the discussion of their cultures we will also touch on the way some countries feel about these types of technology. It will be important for us to also talk about the environment. Then, finally, we must talk about both the moral and ethical aspects of using robots to perform surgery. By researching and reporting these things, it is our desire for everyone to not only have a better understanding of the technology, but to consider it as an alternate source, if needed in the future. It is technology like robotic assisted surgery that will help us have the long, healthy lives we all desire.

As technology improves, surgical robots are rapidly gaining support among both doctors and patients across America. Today more than 900 hospitals have the da Vinci robot which is double the number in 2007. (Freyer, 2010) Da Vinci robots were first approved by the FDA in 2000 for prostate removal, but now da Vinci robots are used for a variety of other surgical procedures (Freyer, 2010). Robot assisted surgery offers advantages such as smaller incisions, reduced blood loss, less pain and faster healing time (Vijay, 2010), as well as making surgery less demanding for the surgeon. Robotic surgery involves many obvious advantages but the impact of cost, access, and quality must

I have been doing robotic surgery since 2007, just two years after the FDA approved the use of robotic assisted surgery in gynecological surgery in the U.S. I remember the first patient I had when I was starting my minimally invasive carrier, she was a patient who was a single mother of six children with three jobs and have a large gun wound scar in here abdomen. She presented to me with a humongous uterus up to her belly, so my first question that I asked her was, why did you wait that long? Why didn’t you have the surgery earlier? She replied, nobody told me that I could have the

64% of the 113 million internet users in America have searched for medical information. (as cited in Rankin et al., 2005). Many health professionals concern that the internet resources can be potentially negative by spreading misinformation (as cited in Rankin et al.,

Robotic-assisted hysterectomy has gained widespread acceptance in many centers since U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval in 2005. Several reports on the early experiences with robotics for endometrial cancer surgery suggest potential advantages over traditional laparoscopic surgery, including improved surgeon ergonomics, high-definition three dimensional visions, and wristed instrumentation that improves surgical precision.10The overall postoperative morbidity and complications inherent in both techniques are nearly the same

These results don’t surprise Gabi Barbash, a research physician at the Weizmann Institute of Science in Rehovot, Israel, who was not involved in the work. Other studies have indicated that robot-assisted laparoscopies for colon, gallbladder and uterus removal take longer or cost more than traditional procedures, without much payoff in terms of patient

The easiest and most fundamental way people use online healthcare sites is to gain topic knowledge. The internet lays mountains of information at the end of our mouse clicks; this easy access to information has developed into a culture of information independence. The new generation of patients no longer wants to rely on one source or limited information on their condition. According to a recent journal article by Bill Walsh on America 's

We, as 21st century individuals, live in a world where information is at our fingertips. This is one of the many reasons why the internet has quickly become known as a place where individuals can get any questions answered within seconds. Many patients are even turning to the internet to get their health questions answers! Unfortunately, not all medical websites are created equally. This paper will compare and contrast the credibility, accuracy and usability of three medical websites: PubMed, WebMD and Patient.

robotic system has grown and continues to grow. For example, “The costs for using the da Vinci

The medical world is a place of constant change and evolution. Medical professionals work hard to find ways to more efficiently help their patients. One area of medicine that has changed much over the last decade is surgery. Surgeons have started using the laparoscopic method for most surgeries of the abdomen. Laparoscopic surgery is remarkable from how it works to the many different procedures that can be performed through laparoscopic surgery, and how much easier it is on the body than open surgery.

More so, the usage of the Internet and other global media has expanded the ability of patients to have access to an enormous amount of information about diseased previously thought “too technical” requiring government policy that sought to limit the control and influence of physicians.

Technology is transforming the medical field with the design of robotic devices and multifaceted imaging. Even though these developments have made operations much less invasive, robotic systems have their own disadvantages that prevent them from replacing surgeons all together. Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) is a broad notion encompassing a lot of common procedures that existed prior to the introduction of robots. It refers to general procedures that keep away from long cuts by entering the body through small, usually about 1cm, entry incisions, through which surgeons use long-handled instruments to operate on tissue inside the body. Such operations are directed by viewing equipment and, therefore, do not automatically need the use of a robot. Yet, it is not incorrect to say that computer-assisted and robotic surgeries are categories that fall under minimally invasive surgery (Robotic Surgery, n.d.).