The Use Of Wiretapping Is Illegal In The United States

Government Wiretapping is when the government gets access without court consent is used completely illegally Every day, Hundreds of millions of people chat exchange text messages and send picture through social sites like Facebook and you don't know whether or not the government is watching you and see everything you send out they are just invading your privacy. While it may help catch criminals (terrorist drug dealers etc) it is being used to spy on millions of people ILLEGALLY there have even been some cases of government officials choosing to spy on people they know even if they know they're innocent. Why should the government be allowed to wiretap without court consent? They are looking at innocent people's information and some cases have

Acts of terrorism are vicious and pitiless, taking the lives of innocent individuals. I believe that in order to stop these acts of rebellion, unconventional means of combating the threats are necessary, one of these being, wiretapping. In the article, Counterpoint: War on Terror and Wiretaps, the authors explain the controversial issue regarding the government tapping our technology. Although the process may seem excessive and invading to some, it will help save the lives of American citizens. It seems only obvious that someone should care more about the safety of their loved ones, than their text messages being exposed to the government. In the book, Fahrenheit 451, written by Ray Bradbury, it discusses a society in which the government

Every since 9/11, the surveillance in the United States has become stricter and of more importance. The security is more top-notch than it has ever been because of the fear a future terrorist attack striking once again. The United States government is doing this for safety issues and the protection of Americans, but many are against the whole idea of having the government spy on you and others actually agree with it.

Every move you make on the Internet can be recorded step by step, website to website. While researching articles on internet surveillance one said how US government has been forcing American telecommunication companies to turn over the call records of every one of their customers to allow the NSA to search them with a reason.(Glenn Greenwald. NSA collecting phone…). However I find this completely wrong, the government shouldn’t be having our call records unless they have some sort of evidence that we are a suspect or threat to this country. It also mentioned how the “NSA believes this general monitoring of our electronic communications is justified because the entire process takes a small amount of seconds”.(Glenn Greenwald. NSA collecting phone…). Despite the general illusion that today’s surveillance technology is used for a good purpose, people should be aware of the consequences when it’s used in the wrong

The National Security Association (NSA) monitors the communications without warrant or viable cause, except for the threat of terrorist attacks. Allowing the U.S. Government to monitor its people violates their Fourth Amendment right to privacy. Not only is monitoring a violation of right, but the NSA is also keeping

The NSA has been secretly ordered to eavesdrop by the Bush administration after the 9/11 terrorist attack. The base of where the NSA has been operating their wiretapping agenda is in Bluff Dale, Utah the building sprawls 1,500,000 square feet and possess the capacity to hold as much as five zeta bytes of data it has cost almost $2,000,000,000. The act of spying over the USA citizens even though they are suspicious is a threat to the people’s privacy and the privacy of other countries’ members are being infringed on by the NSA by the act of wiretapping. The action of wiretapping violates laws for privacy, like the Bill of Right’s Amendment Four which says “Every subject has a right to be secure from all unreasonable searches, and

Under George W. Bush’s term, and shortly after the attacks of September 11th 2001, both the President’s Surveillance Program and the Terrorist Surveillance Program have been brought under scrutiny. Each of the programs authorizes the National Security Agency (NSA) by executive order to monitor phone calls,

People’s phones are being monitored by the government. Privacy and unmonitored spaces are not existent in today's world. One good example in today's world is the “Hello Barbie” by Mattel. This “smart toy” retails at 75 dollars and has features such as microphone to listen into little children's lives. The sound bites of the child are sent back to Mattel's headquarters to bexamined so the Barbie can give appropriate responses. Mattel could use this feature for advertisement. They could relentlessly pressure the children to ask their parents for the newest Barbie toy. One hacker named “Matt Jakubowski was able to get into the toy’s system to access users’ system information, Wi-Fi network names, internal MAC addresses, account IDs and MP3 files, he told NBC Chicago. He added that he would be able to use this data to find someone’s house and personal information, and could access their home network and listen to everything Barbie records” (***). This is a serious invasion of privacy and he was only able to do this with his laptop. Anyone can hack into a “Hello Barbie” and find out somebody's personal information. One other example in today's world is the NSA monitoring people. Edward Snowden was a NSA agent who exposed what the government was doing. This can be related to an section of the book Fahrenheit 451 when Montag realizes the hound is tracking him, “Outside the door, in the rain, a

Edward Snowden’s disclosures have brought to light many secret government actions that were previously unknown. One of the most controversial government programs that Snowden disclosed was how the National Security Agency (NSA) collected virtually every phone record for calls made in the United States between US citizens. It makes sense to monitor phone calls to or from callers located outside the United States, because non-US citizens don 't have the protection of the US Constitution and monitoring these calls also might be helpful in identifying foreigners who might be plotting terrorist attacks in the US. However, US citizens have 4th Amendment privacy rights under the Constitution, so it is much more of a problem when the US government collects bulk information about US citizens who do not pose an obvious danger to the country.

Hi Vatche, Personally, I think our country is too paranoid. The news, and the internet have a way with words and images that make the citizens believe that everything is a threat. Sure, I am not happy that someone out there is collecting personal information about me—they are probably reading this right now. But regardless what we do, the NSA will continue to find a way and justify their actions—to record and collect our private conversations and internet searches.

The NSA’s wiretapping program is still in use today and in fact, the issue of its legality has hit a plateau. While the program is praised for its use to prevent attacks and ensure safety, it’s often criticized for its questionable practices and its ties to the Fourth Amendment. However, average Americans such as you and

Warrantless wiretapping should never be justified in any case of protecting national security.Why? Lets just say if this is permitted ,what would stop the government from violating domestic citizens privacy? With that question in mind,allowing warrantless wiretapping is still breaking breaking the law even if it's our own government who is doing it. The constitution was put in place to protect peoples rights and to keep our government in order. Without the constitution, the government would become a tyranny.Andrew McCarthy argument was the we should want the government to do wiretapping for our own protection to assist in investigations. The is some truth in his opinion, being that a lot of investigations would be easily solved if the were

Social media, emails, instant messaging and even video chats are subject to being tapped. In 2006 AT&T admitted to releasing internet activities to law enforcers. On top of the internet, what we watch on television can be monitored as well. Lastly as smartphones have become more and more prominent, law enforcement has been viewing the data stored onto these devices such as audio, pictures and text

Should the government be allowed to obtain wiretaps on anyone whom they deem suspicious without court oversight? There are few people that think that the government should be allowed to use wiretaps without others consent. Along with the few people, there are also few reasons why the people think that wiretaps should be allowed without consent of the person. One reason why wiretaps should be allowed is because wiretaps are helpful, and they could help in bad situations. If a person is missing, then they could be found with the help of using wiretaps to track their phone calls and things, to tell where they are going or where they are at.

I really like how you approached this subject. Showing how the media and some groups misinterpret government actions can be very eye opening to many people. I have family member, and work with people that are so set in this thinking that “Big Brother” is always looking over their shoulder, and collecting all kinds of information about them. I have tried to tell them that the government has way bigger issues to worry about than trying to learn about some middle class person living in the middle of Missouri. I think one of the biggest reasons so many people think that the government is always looking in their windows is the simple fact that many people outside the intelligence world have no idea what actually goes on, and how hard it can be to gather information. Do you think if the American public was more educated on what goes on within the intelligence agencies that they would lower their fear of