The Use of Million Clinical Multiaxial Inventory III Essay

M3 has a two-step scoring method that validates functional psychiatric comorbidity. It also includes a screening cut off

Personality disorders have a sex prevalence rate and there has been some suggestion that those rates reflect gender bias. The bias concerns derived from the “conceptualization of personality disorders, the wording of diagnostic criteria, the application of diagnostic criteria, thresholds for diagnosis, clinical presentation, researching sampling, the self-awareness and openness of patients and the items included within self-report inventories” (Butcher, 2009, p. 356). Studies have failed to prove that there is significant gender bias in the DSM. However, research has showed there is gender bias within clinical judgments. For example, gender related items would be included within self-report inventories (Butcher, 2009). Clinicians tend to judge female patients as being mentally ill more readily than male patients, even when the symptoms are the same. Moreover, women are more likely to be cast as overly emotional, have a need for mood-altering medication and require ongoing monitoring/treatment (Zur and Nordmarken, 2010).

Patel, Samir H; Choate, Laura Hensley. Journal of Mental Health Counseling 36.1 (Jan 2014). Conducting Child Custody Evaluations: Best Practices for Mental Health

The MMPI-2 is one of the best psychological tests to use because the validity scales are effective in identifying test-takers who may be faking

However, American psychologists contributed to the development of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-5) which classify personality disorders into a number of categories (Shedler, Beck, Fonagy, Gabbard & Gunderson, 2010). The DSM-5 identifies 10 personality disorders into three categories called clusters. The first cluster consists of three disorders; the avoidant, dependent, and obsessive-compulsive personality disorders (Griggs, 2014). Griggs reports that these disorders show highly anxious or fearful behaviour patterns (2014). The second cluster also involves three disorders; the paranoid, schizoid, and the schizotypal personality disorders. According to Griggs, people who are in the second cluster show eccentric or odd behaviours. There are four personality disorders in the last cluster; the antisocial, borderline, histrionic, and narcissistic disorders. They show excessively dramatic, emotional, or erratic behaviour patterns (Griggs,

Side note: On https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personality_disorder_not_otherwise_specified the author of this paper altered this webpage to reflect the current DSM-5.

The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) “is an introspective self-report questionnaire designed to indicate psychological preferences in how people perceive the world and make decisions” (13). It is one of several personality assessments that is popular among modern mental health experts throughout the world. Currently, it is estimated that the MBTI is “taken by more than two million people per year and is translated into 16 languages (10). “The purpose of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator personality inventory is to make the theory of psychological types described by C. G. Jung understandable and useful in people 's lives” (4).

The diagnostic process for personality disorders currently covers a broad scope of various tests and symptoms, causing a source of frustration for psychiatrists (Aldhous). The symptoms and side effects of several personality disorders can tend to blur together, making diagnosis challenging (Aldhous). Most psychiatric patients are diagnosed with several personality disorders at once, with twenty percent of people with personality disorders simply diagnosed with a “personality disorder not otherwise specified” (Aldhous). Using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Health Disorders, commonly referred to as the DSM, psychiatrists attempt with great difficulty to categorize their patients into a specific disorder, only to diagnose

An assessment or evaluation of malingering can pose a difficult task for forensic psychologists or evaluators. In other words, malingering can be difficult to detect. However, a series of psychological tests have been developed to help forensic psychologists detect a person who is faking symptoms of mental illness. Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI-2) is one of the most frequent used psychological test in assessing mental illness. The MMPI-2 consists of various scales which accurately detect symptoms of false exaggeration. Another psychological test is the Structured Interview of

There is a common misconception about antisocial personality disorder despite having various current data about this personality disorder. Many people make the mistake of considering ASPD and psychopathy as one in the same. ASPD has distinct traits and despite current research, the disorder is still very little understood by professionals. The focus of this paper is to outline our current understanding of ASPD like diagnosis, symptoms, and treatments available. By referencing the following sources: Analucia A. Alegria, Carlos Blanco, Nancy M. Petry, Andrew E. Skodol, Shang-Min Liu, Bridget Grant, and Deborah Hasin (2013) Sex Differences in Antisocial Personality Disorder: Results From the National Epidemiological Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions, the National Institute of Mental Health (2010) “Antisocial Personality Disorder”, the American Psychiatric Association (2012) DSM-IV and DSM-5 Criteria for the Personality Disorders, J. Reid Meloy (2011) in Gabbard's Treatments of Psychiatric Disorders (5th

These included the SCID-I, IRA, and SCID-II. After the tests were taken, a primary interviewer would present each case to a minimum of three judges. The participants in these trials were 54 BPD participants, 55 participants with another personality disorder, and 29 participants with no personality disorder. Between each interview session, each participant took the IIP, which is a self report that measures interpersonal difficulty. Their mean score, out of 88 items, was used. During the IIP, significant others, relatives, spouses, or close friends, were interviewed about the participant. The second session had another interviewer, unaware of the other results, measure interpersonal function with the RAPFA test. This measured functioning across work, romantic relationships, friendships, and unspecified social relationships on a 1 to 9 scale, with 1 being the best, and 9 being the worst. The mean from all four was used as the overall level, and judges also evaluated these results. Electronic diaries were also used, with participants rating their behavioral, (7 items, each out of 10) and emotional responses (33 items, each out of 10) after social interaction. The participants also had to evaluate 24 different faces, determining whether they thought the person in the photo would like or dislike the participant, and whether the person in the

Antisocial personality disorder is an important concept to understand when talking about mental illness and offenders, as according to a study in England on 1396 violent male offenders, they found that there was a prevalence rate of 73% for any personality disorder, and out of that percentage, 65% of the male offenders had antisocial personality disorder (Serin, Brown, Bennell, Forth, Nunes, and Pozzulo, 2010, p. 330). According to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV (DSM-IV), antisocial personality disorder is defined as having a “pervasive pattern of disregard for and violation of the rights of others”. In Farrington’s 2000 study, he wished to find the psychosocial predictors and risk factors in antisocial personality and adult convictions

Dombeck, M., Hoermann, S., Zupanick, E.C. (2011). Personality Disorders: Problems with current diagnostic system. MentalHelp. Retrieved on 14th March, 2013, from http://www.mentalhelp.net/poc/view_doc.php?type=doc&id=569

some of the thing the BASIS-32 measures. The BASIS-32, also measures impulsive and addictive behaviour and psychosis.

The Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-III or MCMI-III is a level C, self-report personality test created by Theodore Millon, PhD, DSc, with Carrie Millon, PhD, Roger Davis, PhD, and Seth Grossman, PsyD. The MCMI-III was published originally by NCS Pearson, Inc in 1994 but was then re-released in 1997 (Millon et al, 1997). This test is pretty pricey coming at $406.95 for the fourth edition, the third edition is no longer available for purchase since a newer version has been published and using the third edition would be unethical. The price for the fourth edition of the MCMI-III personality test is for the manual scoring starting kit, which includes: 10 test booklets, 50 answer sheets, 50 worksheets, 50 profile forms and answer keys; however the plain manual without any of the additional required items can be purchased for $61.50. The fourth edition will be released later on this year, 2015 (Clinical Psychology, 2015).