The Views Of Macaulay And Gandhi On Improving Social And Political Structure Of India Essay

Mohandas Gandhi’s methods not only led to India’s independence from Britain but also had victories over racial

Gandhi was an Indian lawyer, politician, social activist and writer who would lead the independence movement of India to free the country of British rule (“Mahatma Gandhi,” 2017). He would prove that a single person could change the course of history and take on the entire British Empire. Gandhi’s principles of nonviolence and civil disobedience are attributed to his success in gaining independence for India. The act of passive resistance allowed Gandhi to generate more support for his movement for independence while making it difficult for the British to find reasons to arrest them. He argued that although violence could be more effective than peaceful

Throughout modern history, Britain’s exponential growth inevitably affected the future of many nations in the contemporary world- in particular, the culturally intertwined state of India. Even in the initial stages of colonisation, India was forcefully occupied by the British East India Company; however, it was not until 1858 that a dictatorship was officially announced and the nation was forced to regard England as 'the true homeland'. Amidst societal unease and a growing discontent with the British rulers by the poor peasants, India's emancipation seemed inevitable in order for the nation to truly progress. In effect, a revolutionary leader spawned; Mohandas Gandhi. His great philosophical mind held innovative ideas which were instrumental in the achievement of Indian Independence- with his thoughtful ideologies and beliefs paving the way for oppressed Indians to ultimately unite against British imperialism. Consequently, this resulted in the monumental Satyagraha campaign that triumphed successfully against the British authorities.

It became evident that the British could maintain the empire only at enormous cost. At the end of the Second World War, they saw the writing on the wall, and initiated a number of constitutional moves to effect the transfer of power to the sovereign State of India. For the first and perhaps the only time in history, the power of a mighty global empire 'on which the sun never set', had been challenged and overcome by the moral might of a people armed only with ideals and courage.

In 1757, Great Britain extended its empire into India. This occupation would not fully end until 1947. In the time between, there were many movements by the Indian people to gain independence from the British. The movement that finally succeeded in winning India’s independence was led by one of the most influential figures of the 20th century, Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi. Gandhi’s methods for fighting against the occupation of the British were very different from those of any of the freedom movements before. And that was why it worked. Gandhi did not agree with the general reasoning of the time: that conflicts could be solved through negotiation and forceful resistance.1 Rather, his faith led him to go

Lalvani states that Britain brought the english language to India. Britain spread it to people who had 700 different languages (Lalvani). This spread allowed the people to use English to communicate with each other, before this spread of language an Indian from the west could not communicate with an Indian from the east because they would not have a common language. Lalvani also states that the British enacted social reforms helping some parts of India with old tradition that was not right. The British came to India and ended highway robbery, ended widow suicide, and ended female infanticide (Doc 18). The highway robbery was something that would happen when you traveled, it was while you were traveling that you would be jumped and beaten or killed while they stole all your valuables and it was stopped. Widow suicide was when a womans husband died she was expected to jump on the fire that was cremating him and die with him and this was also stopped by the British. Female infanticide was also ended by the british. Female infanticide was the act of killing a infant that was female because it was a curse to have a female child. The British ended this by telling them that it is wrong to kill and infant no matter the gender putting a stop to female infanticide. Unintentionally doing good things for the social impact in

Literacy barely increased in India during British rule, from %5 at the beginning of colonialism to just %16 when India got its independence (Doc #5). But while in India, the British banned suttee (the traditional Indian act that required widows to commit suicide at their husband’s funeral) and established museums to preserve Indian culture (Lalvani). They also established universities in India and sent rich Indian men to England to study (Lalvani). Though not increase the number of educated people, the British made people who were educated received a better education. Medical technologies did improve in India thanks to the British, even if many people did die from famine (Gandhi). Britain provided advancements in sewage management that drastically improved public health (Lalvani). If someone did get sick, they also built hospitals and provided improved medicine (Lalvani). Though many people did die, those who didn’t lived longer, healthier lives. Literacy barely improved and many people did die, but the social actions that Britain had greatly improved India and their improvements lasted long after they left their

To start, Mohandas Gandhi's goal was to March peacefully and without violence.” My ambition is no less than to convert the British people through non-violence, and thus make them see the wrong they have done to India... but if you cannot see your way to deal with this evils and if my letter makes no appeal to your heart... to

The purpose of this historical inquiry is to analyze to what extent did British Imperialism have an effect on shaping modern India? The main source that will be discussed in this paper is the seventh book of the Spotlight on History Series called The British Raj, which explains the reasons behind the conflicts between the British Empire and Indian nationalism and assess the achievements of a memorable relationship.

Mahatma Gandhi not at all like the greater part of Indian people group needed to face Great Britain in inactive resistance he called it a "weapon of feeble men". Gandhi trusts that the best approach to stop the arraignment of his kin is by common insubordination. Mahatma Gandhi utilized common insubordination since he realized that it was the main way that the Indian individuals could battle the Great Britain laws. Gandhi's called his type of common noncompliance "Satyagrahis" and, one of the trust that Satyagrahis gave was that Indian individuals where solid and with that trust it made the Indian individuals trust they will have the ability to over decide the laws that Great Britain passed. Gandhi additionally said that Satyagrahis was a serene type of common defiance and savagery is precluded notwithstanding when it would be to support them. Gandhi said that "Satyagraha and savage drive, being each an invalidation of the other". Something else that Gandhi see on common defiance held was that when a man choose to be a part of the development that he knows the outcomes and will pay the punishments for his

Mr. Cook makes a strong case in his attempt to understand the causes and contributing factors behind the segregation along race, class and gender lines which were so prevalent in British ruled India, but also strictly observed within Britain and her other colonies. In “Conflicting Ideologies in British India, 1875-1900” he cites factors both specific to India, in particular the suppressed revolt of 1857, and those more external, like the “hardening racism” in Europe. The substantial losses, both financial and in human lives, associated with the revolt of 1857 resulted in a significant decline in trust and an increasing hesitancy to risk “antagonizing Indian sensibilities”. Since the revolt was viewed as retaliation for British attempts to Westernize India, this fearful reluctance to continue along the path previously envisioned by some which ultimately resulted in Britain’s empowerment, modernization and civilizing of the native Indians to a place of independent governance and administration, became less appealing but also served as additional justification for European society’s changing perception of race. The elite Anglicized Indians had not only dared to challenge British authority and administrative processes, but they had dared to utilize their Western teachings to do so. This clearly barbaric application of treasured knowledge, which the British perceived they had bestowed upon the fortunate Indians as a gift, was viewed as further proof of the inability to

Mohandas Gandhi, the leader of India’s independence movement in the early 1900s, inspired many with his use of civil disobedience to bring about change in society. Gandhi was an educated individual who studied law in London and worked in South Africa. Here, he experienced discrimination first hand due to British individual's sense of superiority caused by the concept of social darwinism. This lead to him advocating for equality and later transgressed to the liberation of India, who was at that time under Britain’s control. His method of promoting change through civil disobedience was so revolutionary in a time where violence was so prominent, and was able to capture the astonishing resilience of Indians against British oppression.

Aroused by the massacre of Amritsar in 1919, Gandhi devoted his life to gaining India’s independence from Great Britain. As the dominant figure used his persuasive philosophy of non-violent confrontation, he inspired political activists with many persuasions throughout the world (Andrews 23). Not only was Mahatma Gandhi a great peacemaker, but also his work to achieve freedom and equality for all people was greatly acknowledged. Gandhi’s unconventional style of leadership gained him the love of a country and eventually enabled him to lead the independence movement in India.

This essay will focus on the decolonisation of India by the British Empire and the problems they encountered. It will also aim to bring recognition to the struggle decolonisation brought upon the world after World War II. Pierce states that “after the War concluded, a worldwide process of decolonisation commenced in which Britain granted independence to all of its major colonies, beginning notably in India” (Pierce, 2009). India had struggled with uprisings and conflicts for the many years of British occupation but when Gandhi began sharing his social efforts; the perceptions of colonialism began to change leading to the collapse of the British colonial Empire. Gandhi began changing the lives of regular Indian’s with his popular visions, he also advocated for the people of India in a non-violent

India’s path to the modern world differed from that of most countries. They had a much harder time reaching the democratic positions of countries such as Britain and Japan for multiple reasons. These reasons included the traditional frame of mind which persisted into the 19th century, and to a degree still persists nowadays. Another difference between India’s path and Britain or Japan’s path to the modern world is the role imperialism has played in India’s economics and politics. The final aspect that separates India from Britain and Japan is the role that the peasants played in this transition. All of these aspects played a part in India’s road to the modern world, and each one plays a role in the type of modern society which India has today.