Historian’s Views on Lincoln’s Presidency After reading several historians’ texts regarding Lincoln’s opinions and policies toward slavery, and the unification of a nation as a whole, I distinguished that several authors have contending visions of Lincoln’s actions during his presidency. Some authors (Dirck, Guelzo, Striner) portray Lincoln as the great emancipator in depicting him as a crusader whose main purpose during the Civil War was only to accomplish the abolishment of slavery. In contrast, some authors (Escott, Gates, Foner, and McPherson) maintain a more critical stance on Lincoln’s decision to abolish slavery citing that his main goal was solely to preserve the Union and not out of a personal resentment towards …show more content…
During this time, Lincoln became a strong advocator against slavery which opens the door to many questions. Some historians believed that Lincoln was truly trying to protect African Americans and their freedom, however, several historians believe that Lincoln’s sole motivation was preserving the union. The reason historians question Lincoln’s intentions when it comes to abolishing slavery is because they believe he was simply trying to preserve the Union and in doing so, slaves would also be freed, but with no relation to Lincoln 's personal affiliation with African Americans or slavery. The issue of slavery played a huge part in the Civil War, and during these four gruesome years President Lincoln held his ground and stood stable in his belief that slavery should and would one day be abolished. Some historians show skepticism in their narratives towards Lincoln’s intentions in the abolishment of slavery although. In works such as: Abraham Lincoln and White America, The End of Slavery in America and Father Abraham Lincoln 's Relentless Struggle to End Slavery, the authors highlight Lincoln’s personal motives for the abolishment of slavery. These specific historians choose to focus on explaining Lincoln’s character and how his personality played a role in his ideals on ending slavery. These authors depict Lincoln as the hero who liberated the slaves because it was what he felt a necessary justice. Author Richard Striner in his
Thomas J. DiLorenzo exposes the preconceived “Hero” myth of Lincoln in his novel “The Real Lincoln”, while also conjuring an internal debate within the reader. In doing this he creates intrigue, which encourages a more thought provoking study into Lincoln’s legacy. The novel covers a wide variety of content, starting with Lincoln’s run at the local and state government levels, while also expanding on his late political career – a time during which the Union’s struggle to secure State’s rights led to the conflict we know as the Civil War. DiLorenzo delves deeper into the Lincoln political machine, and delves deeper into the economic and social policies during his tenure in office, ultimately demonstrating how the Lincoln administration changed policy for the years to come.
With the eruption of the Civil War came one of the biggest tribulations and trials that this country has ever faced, but as we understand the motives of one of the greatest Presidents in American History we can see that the Civil War was inevitable. From his original intentions of merely preserving the Union and holding the country together, to permanently abolishing slavery we can observe why prevailing in the struggle of the Civil War is one of Lincoln’s defining legacies. Thus, as the civil war draws to a close, an old tumultuous era has ended, and a new more prosperous era has
The Real Lincoln: A New Look at Abraham Lincoln, His Agenda, and an Unnecessary War, by Thomas J. DiLorenzo completely shatters the illusion of the 16th President as the liberator of the slaves. DiLorenzo provides convincing evidence for Lincoln’s overt racism as expressed in his documented views on racial supremacy as stated in his desire to colonize all American blacks outside the United States (p. 4); Lincoln’s views were matched by the majority in the North who used such tools as state constitutional amendments to prohibit the emigration of black people into Northern states like Lincoln’s home of Illinois (p. 4); and that the Presidents war which killed 620, 000 Americans and destroyed 40% of the
Behind the great emancipator's created public persona lies the real Abraham Lincoln, a man who not only used his political standing on slavery to get into presidency by consistently changing his opinion on them, but actually had an ulterior motive to free the slaves with a questionable document, the emancipation proclamation. While some historians like Eric Foner in The Fiery Trial: Abraham Lincoln and American Slavery and Richard Striner’s Father Abraham: Lincoln’s Relentless Struggle To End Slavery would agree that this change can be described as growth, others like James Oakes essay Freedom National: The Destruction of Slavery in the United States, 1861 - 1865 would say that it was all part of his initial plan to free the slaves. James M. McPherson would complement Lincoln on his character, but other more daring historians would challenge the idea that Lincoln had actually freed the slaves with the emancipation proclamation, something Henry Louis Gates’s Lincoln on Race &
He keeps to the subject very well in this book, making the tone of it objective, keeping his personal views out. The book is written in an undeviating fashion, looking at Lincoln’s relationship with slavery from his early childhood to his death and beyond.
In, “Abraham Lincoln and the Second American Revolution”, James M. McPherson analyzes the Civil War and how Lincoln played a role in affecting the outcome and development of the war. McPherson not only portrays Lincoln’s role, but also his strategy and ability to unite a nation that was on the verge of collapsing.
Slavery had become a regular and a striving institution in the United States since 1620 as a free labor force. Slaves were the lumberman, builder, harvester, the planter, the caretaker or the shopkeeper; the use of slaves was well entrenched into the American lifestyle which made it difficult to diffused such practice. However, the African American slaves of the 1800’s and few politician demand change, Lincoln rose from a boy who was considered “lazy” for reading books rather than farming to be the voice of the Union. Lincoln illustrated throughout his political career that he was the defender of the Constitution and the Declaration and only through his interpretation, religious perspective and the use of his virtues; Lincoln was the individual that exacerbated the issue of slavery, but he was also the protector of the core principles of the United States of America.
The freedom of America’s slaves has always been accredited to Abraham Lincoln, but he was not always the complete abolitionist as he is commonly portrayed. The “house divided”, as Lincoln depicts it in his famous ‘House Divided’ speech, of the United States during the Civil War, was not always lead towards the freedom of all mankind, and there is sufficient evidence to support this claim. The sixteenth president is most commonly remembered for inducing the courage and determination to end the Civil War, with the Emancipation Proclamation, although when it more closely studied he did not cross the great divide of enslavement vs. freedom with the submittal of that fabled document. When following the many famous quotes and speeches of Lincoln’s life, it appears that he was against all slavery and bondage. Although when they are more closely examined, the quotes and speeches actually leaned towards his lack of strong opinion on the outcome of slavery. Lincoln is perceived as the most famous revolutionary of American history, but he does not live up to his legacy of being the eradicator of forced servitude.
As Abraham Lincoln was elected President, many controversies stirred among the people of his country. Lincoln was a true man who saw slavery as evil but did not call himself an abolitionist. He believed the way abolitionists chose to denounce slaveholders did not fit their democratic country favoring majority rule. Though he knew slavery was morally wrong, he also knew it was up to the people to decide where they wanted to have slavery, and abolitionists interfered with that. He did not wish to preserve slavery in his country nor did he oppose those who did. His plan for the Union was to prevent the further colonization of states to include slavery in hopes that it would slowly cease to exist. To the abolitionists, Lincoln’s lack of action
In American History the civil war can arguably be described as one of the most influential and pivotal moments for the United States of America because for the first time since the nations creation the country was divided. Many people consider this war to be Lincoln’s war to free the slaves. However, upon further review, Lincoln did not have such a positive attitude towards slaves. Lincoln was more concerned with keeping the country which he presided over together and tried to keep the issue of slavery up to the states. Nevertheless, slavery, having long been the backbone of American society, was undeniably going to play a huge role in the civil war. Lincoln understood that slavery was important and over time his views that slavery was an issues
Shortly following the first few sentences, Dilorenzo immediately challenges what most people know about Lincoln by saying that the works composed about him are a myth. Most assume that Lincoln was a noble politician, supporting the American way of life. However, Dilorenzo states that Lincoln “seethed in frustration for many years over how the Constitution stood in the way of his political ambitions” (3). This accusation proposes the notion that Lincoln was not a patriotic American man, but a selfish politician only concerned with his own political agenda. Also, many students are taught that Lincoln was an advocate for the abolition of slavery. However, Dilorenzo argues that Lincoln was “opposed to political or social equality of the races” (3). A pro-abolitionist strongly supports the equality of the races, whereas Lincoln supposedly does not.
During the Abraham Lincoln’s short time as president, he managed not only to save a nation deeply divided and at war with itself, but to solidify the United States of America as a nation dedicated to the progress of civil rights. Years after his death, he was awarded the title of ‘The Great Emancipator.’ In this paper, I will examine many different aspects of Lincoln’s presidency in order to come to a conclusion: whether this title bestowed unto Lincoln was deserved, or not. In order to fully understand Lincoln, it is necessary to understand the motives that drove this man to action. While some of his intentions may not have been for the welfare of slaves, but for the preservation of the Union,
Abraham Lincoln, one of the Founding Fathers of the American nation, freed the slaves, but while doing so made many enemies. In the book Killing Lincoln by Bill O’Reilly and Martin Dugard , Lincoln’s civil war and post civil war mindsets are described in detail. Lincoln’s struggle to do the right thing and desire to unify America is perfectly illustrated all while maintaining historical accuracy, and the introduction of the conspiracy theory is done in a way that makes it seem plausible to the readers. The book is written in the third person format with a non-omniscient narrator, telling Lincoln’s story in a direct, objective manner in order
Abraham Lincoln is revered as a hero throughout American history. He accomplished many amazing and difficult feats such as abolishing slavery and winning the Civil War. He is thought to be a role model, who was always on the right side of history. However, some people don’t always hold the same views as they were believed to have held. Lincoln's views on race relations didn’t remain so progressive, despite what people might think.
This investigation will analyze how Abraham Lincoln's view on slavery reflected during and after the American Civil War from 1861 to 1865. To analyze exactly how Lincoln's position on slavery affected the war overall, this investigation looks at Lincoln's moral and religious views as well as his social and political views. Two main sources were used, both dealing with events relevant to his political career and his roots in his career and other important issues including slavery. Lincoln by David Herbert Donald tells a deep and detailed story on all aspects of his life and career. Abraham Lincoln and the Union deals with his struggle towards Union victory. Both Lincoln and Abraham Lincoln and the Union will be evaluated for their values,