preview

The Violinist's Thumb Book Report

Decent Essays

In the book The Violinist's Thumb, by Sam Kean, something that stood out to me was how some of the scientists mentioned in section 1--Friedrich Miescher, Gregor Mendel, Thomas Morgan, Calvin Bridges, Alfred Sturtevant, James Watson, and Francis Crick-- are not only influential, but are also ridiculed or ignored by either scientists, today or then, despite their reputation. For instance, Kean (2012) notes: Though we know Miescher was largely right in defining the nucleus, other scientists balked at his admittedly premature suggestion; there just wasn't enough proof And even if they bought that, they wouldn't grant Miecher's next, more self serving claim: that DNA influenced heredity. (p.23) Kean's use of the derogatory words/phrases-- "balked", "admittedly premature", "if they …show more content…

What all of these early geneticists did that leave me in awe is that they proposed an idea that was not only out there, but also putting their reputation on the line. Today, in school specifically, students are taught to avoid the abstract ideas that don’t have the purpose or evidence to support it. That's why I find myself dumbfounded, because that is exactly what these geneticists did. I'm dumbfounded not because of their contributions to their field or their complex ideas, what I find amazing is that these scientists tried to change the status quo with ideas that seemed completely irrational, in a world where immediate change is unwelcomed. What I believe the most valuable thing for everyone to take away from this section is that sometimes the seemingly irrational thinking that others consider nonsense or moronic, is exactly what the world needs to progress in every field of study: science, math, technology, philosophy, music, world politics, and even broader ideas, like leadership, happiness, and

Get Access