The Wandering of King Lear’s Mother
After he experiences all kinds of humiliation done by Goneril, and finds his
messenger Kent in the stocks, King Lear, in Act 2 Scene 4, conjures up the “mother”
to express his outburst of rage and physical symptom sensations:
O! how this mother swells up toward my heart;
Hysterica passio! down, thou climbing sorrow!
Thy element’s below. Where is this daughter? (II.iv.56-58)
Who is this “mother”? Or what is this “mother”? As many critics have
identified, this “mother” is another name for the womb, matrix, or uterus. That the
“mother swells up” points to the disease called hysteria. Yet, who is responsible for
the rise or wandering of Lear’s “mother”? Does
…show more content…
“Besides the English name of the mother, or the
suffocation of the mother, the disease goes under several other names” (Camden 391).
As Jorden writes, “This disease is called by diverse names amongst our Authors,
Passio Hysterica, Suffocatio, Prafocatio, and Strangulatus uteri, Caducus matrices,
etc.” (5)
We may wonder what has Lear to do with the mother, since his anatomy is
obviously deficient of such a disease. How does the mother affect Lear as well as
his relationship to other characters? Is Lear a male hysteric?
It is obvious that the mother revealed and represented by Lear’s words is a
complex representational figure, simultaneously “real” and “fantasized”. It is “real”
in the sense that Lear can in no way deny or repress the mother’s urgent emergency
and her terrifying power and wrath. 1
It is “fantasized” in the sense that there is
simply no bodily space to mark her presence.
On the other hand, the mother can be viewed as a metaphor employed by Lear to
express his emotional and physical states. Given the entire absence of literal
mothers in the play, this conjuring up of the mother seems particularly significant and
meaningful.
The purpose of this paper is to explore the theme of hysteria and to trace the
wandering of this mother and its manifestations in Shakespeare’s King Lear from a
feminist perspective. The obscure, restless, and
It was apparent throughout Shakespeare’s King Lear that a father’s role was meant to have a powerful influence over his daughters. King Lear’s behavior and the way he spoke to his daughters were telling in his own relationships with women. The three daughters’ treatment towards their father resembled their rearing. Typically, a maternal figure was looked upon for guidance and support, and without such; the idea of a broken domicile was left playing a predominant role. As Kahn divulged in “The Absent Mother in King Lear,” it “is marked by the omnipotent presence of the father and the absence of the mother (247).
-Also, it is possible the Fool suspects that whoever counseled Lear to make the decision to split up his kingdom among his daughters was in fact an adversary (possibly Oswald) of either Goneril or
Shakespeare's King Lear is a play which shows the consequences of one man's decisions. The audience follows the main character, Lear, as he makes decisions that disrupt order in his Kingdom. When Lear surrenders all his power and land to his daughters as a reward for their demonstration of love towards him, the breakdown on order in evident. Lear's first mistake is to divide his Kingdom into three parts. A Kingdom is run best under one ruler as only one decision is made without contradiction. Another indication that order is disrupted is the separation of Lear's family. Lear's inability to control his anger causes him to banish his youngest daughter, Cordelia, and loyal servant, Kent. This foolish act causes Lear to become vulnerable to
Lear cannot deny his ultimate role as the king. He desires to maintain his name and his rights as king, but to give control of the kingdom to his daughters and their husbands. However, this cannot work: "We know immediately that he is doomed to painful disillusionment by his assumption that his identity as king, father, and man, being fixed in the macrocosmic scheme of things, must remain unshaken without its worldly supports" (Egan 32). So, King Lear's exercising of this nonexistent power establishes his tragic flaw and the problem of the play: the power of the kingdom must reside in Lear only.
In King Lear, Lear’s conflict of power with his daughters is brought about by his own arrogance, which flaws his judgement and propels his change of heart. When Lear parcels out his kingdom to his daughters, he finds the honesty of Cordelia’s praise to be ungrateful and
Due to this flaw, Lear has given way to the two older daughters to conspire against him. Lear is finally thrown out of his daughters’ homes and left with a fool, a servant and a beggar. This is when Lear realizes the mistake that he has made and suffers the banishment of his two eldest daughters. Lear is caught in a storm and begins to lose his sanity because he can not bear the treatment of his two daughters as well as the error he has made with Cordelia and Kent. Lear also suffers from lack of rest when he is moving all over the place and the thing that breaks him is the death of his youngest daughter, Cordelia. This suffering can be contrasted with other happier times like when Lear was still king and when he was not banished by his two daughters.
At the beginning of “King Lear,” an authoritative and willful protagonist dominates his court, making a fateful decision by rewarding his two treacherous daughters and banishing his faithful one in an effort to preserve his own pride. However, it becomes evident during the course of the tragedy that this protagonist, Lear, uses his power only as a means of projecting a persona, which he hides behind as he struggles to maintain confidence in himself. This poses a problem, since the audience is prevented from feeling sympathy for the king. Shakespeare’s ironic solution is to allow Lear’s progressing madness to be paired with his recognition of truth, thereby forcing Lear to shed his persona, and
Kent’s effort to steer Lear in the right direction backfires. Lear is offended by Kent’s attempt to make him go against his word and reverse the disownment on Cordelia. Lear, feeling his pride in jeopardy, goes into a fit of rage and banishes Kent for questioning his judgment:
Cordelia’s disinheritance and banishment are frighteningly disproportionate to the “sin” she has committed in not flattering Lear. So too, is Kent’s treatment at his hands. This concept of disproportionate consequences for actions done, underlines how monstrous Lear’s arrogance is, as well as his petty tyranny and his lack of self-knowledge. However, the horrors Lear himself will have to suffer later in the play, as a result of his own folly, will also be out of all proportion to his initial blunder. Without Cordelia in the play, these actions would not have been sparked in Lear.
beginning of the play proves to be false. Lear discovers that his necessity to keep
Shakespeare's tragedy King Lear can be interpreted in many ways and many responses. The imprecision’s and complication of the play has led
With death comes self- awareness. Lear has a clear perception of reality as a king and loving father; however it's evident that Lear's daughters give him a completely different identity than the one he gives himself. It suggests his old age and faults. During Lear's first identity crisis, he rhetorically asks “Does any here know me? Why, this is not Lear (I. iv. 10)” as if he doesn't quite know how to define himself other than a “king”. A godly manifestation much? What Lear asks is to be labeled with power, but his daughters concur the frailty of
The subplot in King Lear is of Gloucester and his sons Edmund and Edgar. Edmund, the illegitimate, bastard son, can be seen as somehow unnatural according to the laws of society at that time. Gloucester himself says to Kent, regarding Edgar, "But I have, sir, a son by order of law..." (I.i. 18). The subtext here is that Edmund's conception was outside the law and unnatural to the social structure.
King Lear is a character who displays a great deal of anger throughout the course of the play, he often allows his anger to take over him. A lot of things that are said and during the course of the play are due to Lear’s anger which is a leading factor for his insanity. Lear loses his temper during a love test when his daughter does not give the answer that he was looking for, he disowns her calling Cordelia his, “sometime daughter,” (1.1.119) and gives her share of the land to her sisters. This in turn leads to his insanity because in his blind rage he does not acknowledge the sincerity behind Cordelia’s veiled words; unlike her sisters she does not try to flatter her father in order to receive more land, whereas her sisters have their secrets agendas and do not truly love Lear. In addition to this, King Lear is also enraged when the Earl of Kent who is a loyal follower of Lear, goes against the banishment of Cordelia and speaks up in favour of the youngest daughter. Lear is livid with Kent going against him and banishes Kent, as well reminding him that, “if on the tenth day