The War Soviet Expansion Of The United States

Jimmy Carter, the 39th president, was a very simple and relatable man from Plains, Georgia. His ideals appealed to the Southern democrats. Washington was in chaos after the resignation of Nixon and the citizens of America were tiered of the government’s drama. This is what made Carter so popular in the 1976 election. Carter appealed to America because he was an outsider to Washington. He also wanted to comply with what the people wanted for America; “Carter sought to portray himself as a man of the people” (“Jimmy Carter”, 2009). He used the Watergate scandal to his advantage. He promised America he would always be honest with them: “I’ll never tell a lie”. (“Jimmy Carter”, 2009). This seemed to win over America for the moment because he won

“We cannot be both the world's leading champion of peace and the world's leading supplier of the weapons of war.” (Carter). President Jimmy Carter was a true champion of social justice. He knew that to be a champion of social justice, you have to make morally good actions. Being a President of the United States gave him great opportunities to wield influence and that is something he has continued to do since leaving the Oval Office. This living President has set a precedent of justice in the White House and even more so outside of it. Through his industrious life, his work before the White House, his actions during his presidency, and everything he has done since he has left me with a deep pride for the values that make America who we are as a country. I am proud to have Jimmy Carter has one of our great Presidents and he sets the example of social justice embodied in a person.

This was considered his biggest foreign policy crisis, and damaged his presidency, as he was considered to handle the situation inappropriately. Carter also made attempts to improve relations with the Soviet Union, but instead exacerbated the situation, and Carter’s commitment to human rights divided the United States and the Soviet Union further. Matters worsened when Carter tried to pass SALT II, limiting weapons further then set by SALT I.

Carter took the presidency with several issues that needed resolving, such as rising inflation and unemployment, a country disillusioned with the political system and turbulent foreign relations. To determine the reasons why he was successful in 1976 but not in 1980, it is necessary to look at what his successes and failures were, as well as the different situations in 1976 and 1980.

To start of, he and his cabinet administration started to tweak the foreign policy for people outside the United States lacking human rights. " Human rights is the soul of our foreign policy, because human rights is the very soul of our sense of nationhood" (BrainyQuote, Web). Words like this shows how much Jimmy Carter cares about human rights. Next of, Jimmy Carter informed the press about women abuse.

Which followed through to Ford’s Administration and the Carter Administration. As well as the illegal bombing of Cambodia. Carter gets harassed about his evidence of his failed foreign policy because of the Iranian Hostage crisis, which was not handled well, and the credit for the solution belonged to Reagan.

He appealed to the public and had won. When he was governor though, he fought to end segregation, increased the amount of black officials, promoted equal education, etc. In 1976, Carter decided to run for president. His ideas of balancing the budget and his statement “I’ll never tell a lie” gained momentum during the Watergate Scandal. He won the election and became the 39th president of the United States of America. Jimmy Carter is truly the most influential person during the 1970s. Carter had believed that it was imperative we change our energy policy after the energy crisis in 1973. Carter had succeeded in creating huge emergencies stores of oil and natural gas. He also decreased foreign oil by eight percent. Carter was a human rights activist and had suspended aid to Chile, Nicaragua, And El Salvador because their governments abused their people. The Camp David Accords of 1978 was his biggest accomplishment. Israel and Egypt had signed a peace treaty which Carter had acted in as an arbitrator. Israel withdrew from Sinai and each government recognized each other’s power in the world. Jimmy Carter is my choice because he fought for what he had thought was right and did not give

On the other extreme is Jimmy Carter, president from 1977 to 1981. Ranked last for both his foreign affairs and his overall presidency, Carter left the Oval Office a very unpopular man. Carter’s sole accolade came from the Camp David Accords of 1978-9. Carter invited Israeli prime minister Menachem Begin and Egyptian prime minister Anwar Sadat to Camp David, the presidential retreat, to work out an agreement. Carter played a major role in the negotiations, mediating a dispute that resulted in a peace treaty, that is still intact to this day. Not only did this agreement lay down a long-held peace between two neighboring countries, but it also solidified U.S. ties in the Middle-East. Carter’s other policies and actions are very different, such as the Torrijos-Carter Treaties. These treaties between Panama and the U.S. granted Panama control over the Canal as of 1999 for almost nothing in response. The conservatives of Americans felt as though Carter had “given away” the Canal without receiving anything in return, and this made them believe that our nation was becoming weak under his power. The people’s “Crisis of Confidence” clearly and accurately portrays the conservative’s opinions during Carter’s presidency.

The places with natural wealth became victims of more powerful nations whose power came from seized wealth therefore making American corporations depended on the poorer countries. Another part of the foreign policy was the training of foreign officers. The Army had a “School of the Americas in the Canal Zone,” where thousands of military leaders in Latin America had graduated. The U.S managed a reputation for giving out money. It provided disaster victims aid, but it still depended on political loyalty. Almost all of the aid being provided, was for the military as they still took a huge part of the national budget. When Carter was running for presidency, He said that he would bring down the military spending be 5-7 billion dollars a year, but he increased the amount to $10 billion. Zinn thinks that Carter did not do much to help taxes, food, gas and natural resource prices, and the economy as a

Democrats are recognized for their Christian ideas for the better of society and since Carter was a born-again Christian, he is said to be a liberal politician. After graduating from the US Naval Academy and working a nuclear engineer, Cater returned to his home in Georgia where he was a peanut farmer. This is the time when he focused his life on his faith. His dedication to his religion caused Carter to run for president and use his faith to guide his decisions for the country. His meekness and honesty were two of his political strengths that caught the attention of many voters but the Americans also found that he was uncomfortable when dealing with foreign affairs and in time of crisis. Despite his flaws, Carter and his administration successfully dealt with international policies with Panama, China, and the Middle East. Throughout both of his presidential terms, Carter stressed the importance of peace with blacks, the organization of labor, help the poor, improve education, and provide jobs. He also promised to maintain an honest, fair, and compassionate government for the people. He made huge improvements in energy policies as well as changing the environmental ones but he vowed to fix the budget before performing any major reforms. As a result, Carter successfully controlled the budget, conserved energy, and reduced unemployment which is why he was one of the

Carter was known for aspiring to make the government “competent and compassionate”, although some perceived his presidency as a failure, historians still praise Carter highly. He strived to be responsive to the American people and their ever growing expectations. During his presidency Carter worked hard to fight the continuing economic anguishes of inflation and unemployment. By the end of his

http://www.jstor.org.mines.idm.oclc.org/stable/20202726. Aronoff’s journal article examines how Jimmy Carter’s foreign policy changed throughout his time in office. It focuses what factors caused this political transformation. Carter’s religious involvement and influence is explicitly mentioned throughout this paper. This article will be used as a source to supplement the findings section of my paper since it has information on how Carter’s religion affected his presidential career.

As it comes to many people’s attention that America’s spiritual walls have a crack in them, two of the main questions are why and how it may be repaired. There are many documented facts that present the evidence for the reader to conclude his or her own theory. After analysis of these facts and evidence, it is perfectly obvious to most people that the United States of America will be responsible for its own downfall if people do not open their eyes to the reality of their current actions and take the appropriate measures to correct the path of our beloved country.

In 1976, Jimmy Carter ran for president and gained attention from many people in which he promised substantial changes in the conduct of U.S. foreign policy. He wanted to make a shift by infusing new morality in American diplomacy, one that is established in the strive for human rights. The Carter administration then created a human rights strategy that would serve as the basis of Carter’s foreign policy. Many social conservatives voted for Jimmy Carter because they wanted to stick to tradition. Jimmy Carter is a Democrat and even attracted Republicans to the Democratic party. While Jimmy Carter is a conservative Democrat, his widespread for support for international human rights sparked controversy with his social conservative supporters.

The United States of America has seen great change throughout its history. While a considerable amount of time has matured the nation, the core spirit of the American people remains unaffected. In spite of all the wars fought and problems that arose, the