The Wars And Its Effects On Our Lives

All that should happen is certain types of guns shouldn't be accessible to the public. For example, a war zone gun like an M-16 should not be available to the general public because it is not used to hunt and is not a reasonable gun to carry simply to bare arms. Gun control would also put more restrictions on who can purchase a gun, because some people are not in the right state of mind to own a gun. Manufacturers might also be required to make all guns child proof. It's simple, if guns are available to everyone and anyone, gun violence will not be taken as seriously as it should be. Also, while more gun legislation is needed, the already existing gun laws on the state and national levels need to be strictly enforced. For example, it is a national law that in order to purchase a gun, a background check is required, but not all states enforce this law properly.

It has now been fourteen years since the tragic event of Sep 11 in New York, when hijackers struck two planes into the northern and southern building of the twin towers. Unfortunately two thousand and nine hundred and ninety six people lost their lives that day including over five hundred Muslims. Few days later it was concluded that alqeda terrorists in Afghanistan under the leadership of Osama bin laden were responsible for the deadly attack. Less than a month after the attack the U.S invaded Afghanistan in order to capture those who were responsible and a short time after Iraq was also invaded for the same purpose. For the next decade the U.S spent an annual of one trillion dollars towards the fight on terror. Fourteen years later it is

The Great War of Our Time was a pleasure to read. It was an emotional ride for me throughout the entire book. It made me laugh out loud; giggle to myself, tear up, become upset and sometimes it caused a pleasant grin to grow across my face. From the beginning of this book to the very last page, I thought was an easy read.

To begin with, guns give people a fighting chance to survive and protect others against criminals. “10, 2014 Pew Survey found that 57% of people believe that owning a gun protects them from being victimized” (Procon.org). Who would ever want to die without having the chance of fighting back. Taking away guns from Americans can cause more deaths to those who have no protection.

One provision, the right to bear arms, has had both positive results and negative effects. The world seems to be growing more uncertain. Citizens have turned to violence and the people do not have enough confidence in the police to protect them. They believe if they are attacked, the authorities will not get there in time to save their lives. It may be true that a gun will scare away a potential attacker or prevent possible injury to themselves or their family. Thankfully, there are specific criteria that must be met before a citizen can get a gun, so ideally only responsible citizens will own one. People who live in remote places or places with a high crime rate may not be able to get police protection in time without their own means of protecting themselves. Unfortunately, when there are more guns in society, they have the opportunity to get into the wrong hands. Teenagers or even young children might set the gun off accidentally or use it for the wrong reasons. Young children might hurt themselves or others. Angry, confused teenagers might use the gun to act on their frustrations at a confusing time in their lives. They might even be acting out the fantasies they see in the video games they play. Even in the hands of the owner, guns tend to bring a sense of empowerment. They might become

“The Tragedy of war is that it uses man’s best to do man’s worst” wise words from Henry Fosdick. When it comes down to the time where an individual hits rock bottom, a man either do its best or do its worst. Although, Man can do its best and do its worst at the same time. There are many reasons how man’s best can result to man’s worst. Henry Fosdick statement is both true and false.

Guns can and do protect people, their freedom, and their nation! Guns should not be taken away from innocent and law abiding citizens. More mass murders and killings of innocent people have occured because of citizens not being armed then all the anti gun arguments. Some examples of this would be Germany in 1938 the government rounded up all the guns from 1939 through 1945 in result 13 million civilians were rounded up and killed. They were unable to defend themselves or their families and property against a government turn evil. Guatemala established gun control and took the guns away from people and from 1964 through 1981 100,000 people unable to protect themselves were rounded up and killed. You see this again in Uganda in 1970, cambodia in 1956, and China in 1935. So all through history you can see how taking guns away from the civilians have turned bad. Guns keep people safe yes they can be used to hurt or kill someone but the truth Is most of the time guns save

Only a good guy with a gun can stop a bad guy with a gun so imagine a whole nation without guns. It would be like walking to work scared that you were gonna see your middle school bully. When the west was first being settled everything was decided by a man and his six-shooter, that was a bit of a extreme and led to high body counts, but what makes you think that a extreme the other way would work? What this nation has right now is the perfected middle ground. We may have tragedies like school shooting now but think about the shooting that would happen is only criminals and police had guns. Think about how that would have worked out in Baltimore, or Charleston. Instead of a few victims we would have had thousands dead and martial law in some of our greatest cities. This nation revolves around guns, the fear of who has a gun is what keeps criminals at bay. Without guns we would be left to fight all out anarchy with bows and arrows. This nation would either turn into one thing or the other, a communist state where the civilians have little to no freedom, or a nation ruled by warlords like Somalia. Guns keep everyone in check, criminals can be stopped, and our government knows that they can not take away our freedom unless they take away our

Thousands of deaths and injuries are caused by guns annually. Guns are getting very out of hand at this moment. Many people like to abuse the power of carrying firearms, which basically causes numerous arguments on why some people shouldn’t have the capability to own a gun. Gun control is essential in order for peace to take place. Without gun control, tons of people wouldn’t be here today. However, at this point in time, this is where we need to take a stand and be stricter on gun laws, due to the deaths placed by violent people. Guns tend to make crime rates higher, by leading to many homicides, suicides, and murders. It is time for action to start taking place on these firearms.

Regardless of the possibility that firearms were taken away, culprits would utilize diverse weapons to slaughter; for example, blades, bats, and broken jugs. Humans with malicious intends will still harm others, it doesn't matter if they have a gun or not: therefore, there is reason to impact gun restrictions. Firearms can be utilized to perpetrate demonstrations of viciousness and disregard human rights; nonetheless, they can likewise be utilized to keep those things and keep our country free of corruption and wrongdoing.

Since prehistoric times humans have learned to build and use weapons. The first archeological evidence of the use of blunt weapons and spears was around 400,000 BC (Newscientist.com, “Timeline: Weapons Technology”, Michael Marshall, July 7, 2009). Most of these were built for hunting and gathering food and to defend themselves against large, fierce animals. It was a matter of survival. Eventually humans turned these weapons on each other. The first organized record of warfare comes from Greek and Roman times (Griess, Thomas: Ancient and Medieval Warfare. Page 1, 1984). Since then, weapons have advanced steadily over the years. Each new significant advancement has changed the way battles are fought. As described below, these weapons changed warfare during ancient times, the 20th Century, and during the modern day.

You will have to have to have a licensed to purchase a gun, Require background check for all gun sales, and Ban large capacity ammunition magazines. Lots of people in the world now have stolen guns, or guns that are not theres. But from now on if I'm elected president a person that isn't licensed for a gun will not have one. If you require a background check it will help make the world better. When people go into a gun store the owner does not know why that person is purchasing a gun. They could may have serious problems, and could be buying that gun for the wrong reason. Background checks could check to make sure they have no mental health problems, or if they are crazy or ever been to jail for anything dealing with violence. Another provision would require that any firearm lost in transit between a manufacturer and a seller would be reported to federal authorities.  Although banning large capacity ammunition magazines would hurt most people because some do use the guns in a good way such as to hunt. A gun that can hold up to 100 bullets can be very harmful and hurt lots of people. We have history where they banned it but it expired in 2004. If I'm elected president it will be banned again. Don't get it wrong guns are used in a good way. Its just some people don't need to have guns in their possessions. Guns are used for protection not to kill or hurt innocent people. Gun control is the set of laws

To sum up, despite of the fact that, if guns get taken away, criminals will find something else to use, however, I believe that it is better USA changes the policies of gun ownership and legislates some strict laws to limit the possession of firearms like some countries such as United

First, many people throughout the world have a strong belief that banning guns is going to solve the problem. The theory is that, once there are no guns allowed, people are not going to commit a violent crime with a gun. They do not want to just ban the already technically-illegal guns, they want to ban them all. This would mean no more hand guns and no more hunting rifles. In the article, “Its time To Ban Guns. Yes, All of them,” Phoebe Maltz Bovy writes that it is basically easier to ban all guns, since you cannot sort the population into those who will commit a violent act and those who will not.

When asked how he felt about the deaths of 9 /11, Pablo Sequera , a 22 year old US army soldier in Iraq said "I wanted to bomb the fuck out of every single one of them towel heads". Now fighting in Iraq he says he has grown more sympathy and understanding toward Middle Eastern people. "Actually being up close, watching how they live every day in violence, has given me even more ambition to help them gain freedom" said Sequera. War will always change a person whether it's physically or mentally, a soldier never leaves the way he came in. The smells of gunfire, the loud ping of bullets bouncing off of metal, the vibrations of grenades exploding nearby, and the taste of their own fear climbing up into their throat will always remain close to