The Wechsler Intelligence Scale For Children Fifth Edition ( Wisc V )

The Diagnostic Criteria for learning disabilities (according to the DSM V) is a specific learning disorder which is diagnosed through an examination of the child’s developmental, educational, medical and responses of various interventions that have been tried. The diagnosis is a constant difficulty in reading, writing, and arithmetic during the years of schooling. Symptoms can include imprecise or slow reading, writing that lacks clarity and content, and difficulty remembering mathematical reason and number facts. The academic level must be significantly below average in all areas; and the child’s difficulties cannot be explained by any other disorders and it has to interfere greatly with academic achievement, performance and daily living.

This paper discusses the pros and cons of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-III). First, important definitional, theoretical issues, including the nature of intelligence, a brief history, and pros and cons are discussed. Next, the development, reliability, validity, and assets and limitations of the WAIS-III are examined. This is followed by discussion of the meaning of IQ scores, use of successive level interpretation and cautions and guidelines for administration. Last, subtests, assessing special population groups, short forms, profile forms, and what a

A major strength of this assessment is that this assessment has a Nonverbal Index. This is beneficial for students who are not yet proficient in the English language or struggle with language. Administering the Nonverbal Index allows the administrator to gain a better understanding of the child’s abilities because their language issues are not working against them with this test. Also, this assessment has two theories of intelligence that can be tested: the Luria neurological processing theory and Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) theory of intelligence. With the Luria Model, you will obtain the Mental Processing Index of Learning Ability, Sequential Processing, Simultaneous Processing, and Planning Ability. With the Cattell-Horn-Carroll model, you will obtain the Fluid-Crystallized Index with the areas of long-term storage and retrieval, short-term memory, visual processing, fluid reasoning, and crystallized ability. This assessment is also more child-friendly because of the visuals throughout the test. A weakness of this assessment is the administrator will not be able to obtain a score for auditory processing and processing speed with this assessment, requiring the administrator to utilize another intelligence assessment. This assessment has two intelligence theories options to choose from: the Luria

It tests cognitive performance in six domains: reaction time, processing speed, learning, working memory, delayed memory, and spatial memory (Kane, Roebuck-Spencer, Short, Kabat, Wilken, 2007;, Eonta, et al., 2011). It has been shown to be a reliable screening tool for detecting neurocognitive deficits, especially when compared to baseline measures (Kelly, Coldren, Parish, Dretsch, Russell, 2012; Johnson, Vincent, Johnson, Gilliland, & Schlegel, 2008; Roebuck-Spencer, Vincent, Gilliland, Johnson, & Cooper, 2013; Woodhouse, et al., 2013).

The WISC-IV is a test of cognitive abilities that measures four global areas and combines them to provide a full-scale intelligence quotient. The four areas include Verbal Comprehension, Perceptual Reasoning, Working Memory, and Processing Speed. The Full Scale IQ (FSIQ) is derived from a combination of ten subtest scores and is considered the most representative estimate of global intellectual functioning. The results of the current test conducted on Leo Marcelynas indicate that his Full Scale IQ (FSIQ) is 101. It can be stated with 95% confidence that Leo’s FSIQ falls between 96-106, indicating that he is functioning in the Normative Average Range of intellectual ability. Given the consistency among his scores on Verbal

Reliability measures come in the form of interrater reliability, test-retest for subtest high, internal consistency of .80 or higher, and decision consistency of classification (Brooks, Sherman, & Strauss, 2010; Davis & Matthews, 2010). Internal consistency used the split-half and Cronbach's Alpha. Concurrent validity for intellectual functioning used the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Fourth Edition (.34-.58), Differential Abilities Scales–Second Edition, and Wechsler Nonverbal Scale of Ability (.53-.64); academic validity used Wechsler Individual Achievement Test–Second Edition (WIAT-II) (Brooks, Sherman, & Strauss, 2010; Davis & Matthews,

The study was conducted with the aid of 30 school aged children, ages ranging from 8 years to approximately 10 years and 11 months. Several qualitative statically data were collected to show the results of the study. Included were: descriptive statistics, pivot table and a t test, below I will specifically present each data to help better interpret data collected during intervention.

There were four indices on the WAIS test. They included verbal comprehension, perceptual organization, working memory and processing speed. All the tests measured something different. The Verbal Comprehension index measured how well an individual was able to utilize primarily the English language to express themselves and also how well the individual understood what was

Wechsler Intelligence Scales. The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children - Fourth Edition (WISC-IV) (Wechsler, 2003) was used to evaluate intellectual functioning in the majority (90%) of the children ages 6 to 16. However, some of the children (10%), ages 13 to 18, were evaluated by the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence - Second Edition (WASI-II) (Wechsler, 2011) in addition with the WISC-IV subtests comprising of the working memory (WMI) and processing speed (PSI) indexes.

In defense of my position after completion of my graphic organizer, I have determined that the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children 4th edition, (WISC-IV) should be administered. When administering such a test, it allows for a child’s strengths and weaknesses to be identified which can provide a starting point for further investigation. For example, a low working memory Index score may suggest that a more specific test of working memory may need to be administered; to investigate further the child’s

Bennett presented with a constricted affect most of the time, as she appeared to suppress her emotions after she expressed her frustration with the way in which she was treated in the IEP. During testing of the WAIS, WIAT, and CVLT, she often spoke to herself quietly in a negative manner, including comments like “no, that is a dumb answer” and “no, that’s not it…” It seemed apparent that the longer she waited to respond, the more she became doubtful about her own answers, especially with the working memory-related questions. Moreover, she appeared immensely confused and uncertain during the entire section of the Block Design of the WAIS, suggesting that she has significant deficiency in her visual-spatial ability. Nevertheless, Ms. Bennett’s thought process seemed linear. She did not display any noticeable psychotic symptoms, as well as inattentive hyperactivity, and anxiety during the interview. Ms. Bennett was oriented to person, place, time and circumstance, and she completed the assessment with just a few water breaks in between the tests, as she was able to maintain alertness and attentiveness throughout the entire sessions. Ms. Bennett was administered the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV), a standardized assessment of overall cognitive functioning, potentially revealing individual cognitive strengths and weaknesses. On the WAIS-IV, Ms. Bennett scored a Full Scale Intelligence Quotient (FSIQ) of 71, falling within the Borderline range of

Educators often use the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children –IV (WISC-IV). Another type of test is the norm-referenced achievement test, which compares a student with his or her grade or age-level peers regarding performance. An example is The Wechsler Individualized Achievement Test, Second Edition (WIAT-II), which tests academic skills in mathematics, reading, and written language. These tests, which are predominantly used, identify when students are not achieving at their expected level of ability. The Response-to-Intervention Model is another process that determines whether the student responds to scientifically research-based intervention called the response to intervention (RtI). Apart from being used for instruction, it is also able to pinpoint students with learning disabilities and give suggestions for optimal instruction. The Cognitive Assessment Model is a psychological processing assessment or neuropsychological assessment identifies students’ strengths and weaknesses with regards to psychological processing, including processing speed and working memory. The Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing is a standard way to appraise the current level of student’s performance in relation to memory, awareness, and rapid naming. It locates students whose achievement falls significantly below their peers,’ determines

The purpose of the WJ III is for planning individual programs and diagnosing individual learning disabilities (Hasinger, 2009). The Woodcock-Johnson III documents and assesses academic skills in children and as well as adults. The Woodcock Johnson III test can be used to determine the needs for special support services for academic fields and examine existence. The severity of one's learning disability can be determined through the WJ III (Ellingsen,

Witmer studied children evaluation, which he identified learning disabilities, poor speech, and motor development. He developed standard programs of assessment and treatment. He also hired physicians, social workers, and psychologists to the clinic. He recognized that emotional and cognitive functioning could be affected by physical problems and he sent physicians to examine the children to determine if visual or hearing deficits interrupting to a child's ability. Gradually, social workers and psychologists would have checked the histories on children's family's background to see if anything is determined to affect children's ability. However, Witmer realized that the environmental factors were playing a role in children's lives.

Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC-IV; Wechsler, 1949). This seminal intelligence scale assesses a child 's general intellectual ability across four domains, producing four corresponding index scores: (1) the Verbal Comprehension Index (VCI), (2) the Visual Spatial Index (VSI), (3) the Working Memory Index (WMI), and finally (4) the Processing Speed Index (PSI). The VCI measures verbal concept formation, specifically assessing children 's ability to listen to a question, draw upon learned information from both formal and informal education, reason through an answer, and express their thoughts aloud. An example item from this index is similarities, vocabulary, and comprehension. Next, the VSI measures non-verbal and fluid reasoning and assesses children 's ability to examine a problem, draw upon visual-motor and visual-spatial skills, organize their thoughts, create solutions, and then test them. An example item from this index is solving a 3D puzzle. The WMI measures working memory and assesses children 's ability to memorize new information, hold it in short-term memory, concentrate, and manipulate that information to produce some result or reasoning processes; an example item would be letter-number sequencing. This measure is particularly important for higher-order thinking, learning, and achievement. Finally, the PSI measures the speed of information processing and assesses children 's abilities to focus attention and quickly scan, discriminate between, and