preview

The Wife Of Bath 's Prologue And Tale

Good Essays

After reading ‘The Wife of Bath’s Prologue and Tale’ I can see clear indications and agree that Chaucer was an anti-feminist’ by studying in depth both the prologue and tale I am going to show how Chaucer conforms to a patriarchal perspective in which he believes women are inferior to men making them the weak and unstable sex, who are neither socially, politically or economically equal to a man.
In Chaucer’s `The Wife of Bath’s Prologue and Tale’, Chaucer opens the book with the strong opening sentence of ‘Experience, though no written auctoritee’, (Winny, 1999, p. 35, line 1–2) suggests that The Wife of Bath conformed to the societies needs and wants in that era, where women weren’t educated. However, Chaucer is an antifeminist and starts to build The Wife of Baths character as he progresses by representing her as a manipulative man eater who is out to get what she can from a husband, by using her body and her confidence to do so. By doing this Chaucer makes you re-think his text and almost deceives the reader into thinking very little of The Wife of Bath from the beginning. As we as readers know yes she may not have any written experience but she does have a lot of sexual experience. `God bad us for to wexe and multiplye; that gentil text kan I wel understonde. Eek well I woot, he seyde myn housbonde Sholde lete fader and mooder and take to me. But of no nombre mencion made he, of bigamye, or of octogamye; Why sholde men thanne speke of it vileynye?’ (Winny, 1999, p. 35,

Get Access