The Wolf Of Wall Street

A hero is someone who has concern for others, integrity and intelligence. Andrew Carnegie’s incredible intelligence is overshadowed by his cowardice and lack of concern for his workers. Born in Dunfermline, Scotland in 1835 to an incredibly poor family that immigrated to America in 1848, Carnegie began working almost immediately. His brilliance and intelligence brought him local fame and eventually brought the attention of the general superintendent of the Pennsylvania Railroad and he was hired to work for the Railroad company. Through years of working in the Railroads, he was able to become highly successful and managed to become one of the wealthiest men of his time. Towards the end of his life, Carnegie began donating most of his money to several different institutions, libraries, universities, etc. However, his venture’s into philanthropy were not enough to consider him a hero, but merely an incredibly successful businessman. Andrew Carnegie was not a hero in three areas of his life: his use of money, philanthropy, and the treatment of the workers in his company.

Imagine having all the money you want and still having a ton left over. Andrew Carnegie was a poor boy who ended up becoming the richest man in america during 1901. He worked himself up in the Pennsylvania Railroad company and would have been successful there but he was unclear on what he wanted to do. So he decided to move to New York City where he met Henry Bessemer. Bessemer taught him how to make steel, so then Carnegie moved back to Pittsburg and set up a steel mill. There he became a steel king and it caused him to become extremely wealthy. A hero is someone who has courage, integrity, and a concern for others. There were three reasons Andrew Carnegie was not a hero and they are he was a hypocrite, did not care about others, and caused others to lose self respect.

Hearing of the word hero brings to my mind a good looking man with some qualities of fair, equal, courage, brave, honest and a positive leader. This makes the opposite a villain a person who wishes wrong for someone or a person who creates evil. The event changes dramatically, a hero of the past may not be considered a hero in the present and versa. Hernando Cortes a hero for joining two worlds and conquering the most powerful civilization of America or Hernando Cortes a villain for making the Aztec Empire disappear. Hernando Cortez was an important symbol for the explorations, but killing people, ending the most powerful civilization in America and spreading diseases does not makes him a hero. With

So, who is the villain-hero? This villain may start out at the beginning of the story as a hero, or he may possess heroic characteristics, such as charisma, or he may have a

A hero, as defined in Webster’s Online Dictionary, is a person who “a person admired for achievements or noble qualities” or “one who shows great courage.” However, a hero is not just a person with outstanding achievements. A hero is a person who is philanthropic, generous, and kind. Heros fight for those who cannot fight for themselves, and do not judge those who they are fighting for. They are charitable in ways other than donating money, they give their time and effort in order to make the lives of others more pleasant. Heros display bravery, as they are willing to go into a dangerous situation to help others that have been aggrieved. Social pressures and judgements do not affect a hero’s willingness to help others, and they are willing to push through what others say

Hero, the definition of Hero, has been by pondered by many individuals. Hero is not word of mouth but a word of action characterized by spontaneous acts of benevolence to society, as well as leaving a mass footprint of succession that can be used as aide for the future. A famous entrepreneur, named Andrew Carnegie is a true definition of a hero, existing in an era of massive industrialization, where skyscrapers held their heights, and steam engines ignited. In fact Andrew Carnegie had indeed impacted the industrialized world with his new adoption of the Bessemer process creating his billion dollar steel empire. Andrew Carnegie can be defined as a hero because of struggles in his early life, philanthropy and his impact on the world .

Superman, Wonder Woman, Spiderman—what do all these characters have in common? They are all products of the human aspiration to be saved. The word hero is passed around too much these days. A hero is not a football player that scores the game-winning touchdown or the goaltender who saves his team from a loss. A hero is usually an ordinary person that did extraordinary things. A true hero is really never a hero at all; at least not in their own mind. However, there are various cases today in which we see the exact opposites of these characters, the anti-heroes. The anti-hero is one who cannot be classified as a hero, for that said character lacks natural heroic qualities. However, the anti-hero cannot be described as a villain either.

A hero is defined as someone who is selfless and courageous.A hero also follows high principles strictly and has a great sense of morality. It is also likely for a hero to knowing act to risk his/her own life to save someone else. On the contrary, a villain is someone who acts destructive and is quintessentially evil. A villain will

A hero can be referred to as a brave, courageous, and unique individual who is fearless. In the science-fiction short story, "Harrison Bergeron," written by Kurt Vonnegut, everybody lives in a Dystopian society where the people have worked on changing the Constitution so everyone is completely equal. In this story, in order to make everybody equal, whoever is smarter, stronger, faster, or prettier than anybody else is given handicaps that they must wear at all times, according to the law. Even though they wear handicaps, some people are still too strong for the handicaps, such as Harrison Bergeron. These types of people can either be considered a hero or threat to society. Harrison Bergeron is a hero to society because he could cast a

What characteristics should a person have to be called hero? Andrew Carnegie was born into a poor family in 1835 in Scotland worked his way up the railroad industry, he eventually became the supervisor of the Pennsy's entire western division. He was earning about $1500. A kid that from that super poor family to the very rich person in just 30 years. By the time he was super rich he made a good decision by giving away all his money for the sake of good for the people and putting a lot of funds to different organizations. Although giving his money for the sake of good that does not mean that he is a hero.

A hero by definition is “A man of distinguished courage or ability, admired for his brave deeds and noble qualities.” I believe James Braddock was more than this. He was an honest man who would give anything to see his family happy. In the movie “Cinderella Man” James’s son steals salami meat and brings it home. When James gets home he sees his son was in troubled he found out that he had stolen salami. He knew that was enough food to feed his family for the night but being the honest man he is drags his son down to the deli and makes him return it and apologize.

The difference found between a hero and villain is in why they fight. A hero fights for a greater good found beyond himself, while a villain fights specifically for himself. While a hero fights for the sake of peace, a villain fights for the purpose of continued war. Against the desire of a hero, a villain takes advantage of the apparent power he obtains, to destroy others and bring destruction upon all until he is left the only one standing. Simply put, a hero fights for good, and a villain fights for

Jordan Belfort is the notorious 1990’s stockbroker who saw himself earning fifty million dollars a year operating a penny stock boiler room from his Stratton Oakmont, Inc. brokerage firm. Corrupted by drugs, money, and sex, he went from being an innocent twenty – two year old on the fringe of a new life to manipulating the system in his infamous “pump and dump” scheme. As a stock swindler, he would motivate his young brokers through insane presentations to rile them up as they defrauded investors with duplicitous stock sales. Toward the end of this debauchery tale he was convicted for securities fraud and money laundering for which he was sentenced to twenty – two months in prison as well as recompensing two – hundred million in

Money, sex, drugs, and greed-these four words are characterized and displayed profoundly throughout the movie Wolf of Wall Street. Based on a true story about the life of Jordan Belfort (Leonardo DiCaprio), the movie is narrated and gives insight to the struggle, power, and addictions that surrounded Belfort’s life. Belfort was a stockbroker who learned his way as an entry-level worker on Wall Street before creating his own company Stratton Oakmont. Belfort quickly learned that success on Wall Street was a result of doing any means necessary, regardless if it was the truth or providing a false sense of hope. His main scam involved selling cheap stocks and inflating the prices so the brokers can sell at a high price. Although this was illegal, Belfort was so involved and addicted to money and drugs that his scamming ways were irrelevant.

He repeatably argues that both values can assure maximum protection to both his legal and economic status. In a sense of humanity, Belfort's statement is partially acknowledgeable, however some will controvert that this misleading statement was noted to circumvent his own deceiving personal qualities of amorality. Furthermore, Belfort manipulative literacy techniques evidently reveals his true amorality; insofar, through a dozen or few pages in, Jordan Belfort mentions a language technique named 'straight line persuasion' which is a term for manipulating a buyer's decision on concluding an illegal, non-profitable stock purchase via strong use of his trust and loyalty. Through just one technique he apply's whilst pitching a stock, Belfort gains full control of the vessel and gains full misleading loyalty and trust from his own stock buyers. Expressing Belfort's misleading marketing technique, this upcoming quote will further exemplify his act of perdition, "a highly trained Strattonite, a highly trained killer who won’t take no for an answer, who won’t hang up the phone until his client either buys or dies”. As evidently noted through one prime quote, Belfort arguably gains his trust and loyalty through countless unconscionable acts offending the SEC, FBI, the stock market as well as his unknown stock buyers who all initially earned his trust and loyalty. In addition to the quote, Belfort expresses core values through ambitious language and determination to his so called 'strattonites', training next generation America to be complete fraudsters. Driving my point home, Jordan Belfort is considered by a widespread of citizens as self-beneficial failure corresponding to his moral. Seen through literacy techniques, quotes and