The Woman With The Ointment: Comparing Matthew, Mark And John

Many people do not know that loving your enemy is the heart of the gospel. Although loving and praying for your enemy may seem impossible at times, it is written in the gospel of Matthew that loving your enemy is loving God. In Matthew 5:43, Jesus teaches about loving your enemy, praying for your enemy, and shows examples of loving your enemy.

Starting with differences, in the Gospel of Matthew 15:21-28, Matthew seems to have actually referred to Jesus in the text a few times, whereas in the Gospel of Mark 7:24-30 Jesus is continually referred to as “he” by Mark. Not once is Jesus’ actual name mentioned anywhere throughout the text in which Mark is describing the events of what was going on. Although it might be worthy to note that in other portions throughout Mark’s Gospel Jesus is indeed mentioned by Mark.

While both books of Mark and Matthew portray Peter as one of the most important followers of Jesus, Mark seems to emphasize Jesus' spiritual career unlike the broad, more in-depth pursuit of Jesus' life that Matthew embellishes on. As both Jesus' student and friend, Peter is the one disciple most commonly referred to in the stories. Yet the two passages seem to draw different pictures of Jesus' distinguished disciple. In Matthew, Peter seems to play a larger role in Jesus' teachings and seems more significant to Jesus throughout the book. In Mark, he is still important, but to a lesser extent in the eyes of the author. Mark leaves Peter out of a few of the stories altogether and only touches

Mark emphasized the humanity of Jesus Christ in order to show readers that Jesus not only died for our sins, but provided an ultimate model to live life. This is evident in the way Mark portrays Jesus. The Jesus we see in Mark is the most human Jesus portrayed out of all the 4 Gospels. Understanding this, readers will be able to relate more to Jesus because he actually felt what we felt as humans. In the Gospel of Mark, a common theme is Jesus walking with crowds. This may symbolize that multitudes of people flocked to him as a role model because they saw someone like them who they can look up to.

I have decided to compare and contrast the Gospels of Matthew and Mark. In the book of Matthew, we begin with the angel coming to Joseph and telling him of the son that Mary will bare him. The angel says to name him Jesus and tells him that he will save the people from their sins. This clearly marks Christ as the savior from the start. It can be seen that Jesus is the healer of many when he is presented with sick people, because he heals them. He heals those who are sick, mental, and possessed. He is seen as a teacher when he goes to the top of the mountain and speaks to everyone that is listening, he teaches them what is right from then on. He is seen giving healing powers to his disciples and sending them forth to heal and teach the people of his ways. He is seen as a miracle worker, when he walks on the waters of the sea and calms them and then allows Peter to walk on the water toward him. He is seen as a leader as well, in the many times that he leads his people to where they need to be. He is seen as forgiving, in the many times he forgives and tells others to forgive. He is seen as the Messiah, which was clear from the

In Matthew 26:25 and Mark, 14:21, during the Last Supper, Jesus talks about someone betraying him. Matthew states that it was Judas whom betrayed Jesus, however Mark did not state any disciple who betrayed him. While the disciples were eating during the last supper in Matthew 26:28, Jesus gives thanks and declares that the wine is his blood and is poured out “for many for the forgiveness of sins.” Mark and Matthews gospel were very similar except Matthew altered and added in the “forgiveness of sins”, while Mark does not. Matthew leads into the death of Jesus with quoting the words of the chief priest who mocked him saying, “He trusts in God, let God deliver him now, if he wants to” (27:43), which is not found in Marks gospel.

There are many different gospels that tell a similar story. Matthew and Mark are two Gospels written in a similar way but have different audiences. The story is the Last Supper and is about the last meal that Jesus experienced with his Apostles before his Sacrifice. There are many similarities, but not very many differences. Overall, the same story is told, but from two different perspectives.

The gospel of Mark is a short recollection of Jesus life, it has many details but is missing pieces or additions to his life. The Gospel of mark was said to have lost pieces, and also the first account of Jesus life. Although it is not as detailed in some areas as it is in others, it tells many accounts of Jesus life on earth and what kind of a person he was, the life he lived, his struggles and his ending.

In the Gospel of Matthew, the infancy narrative contributes a large sum of background information of Jesus that contributes to the development of Matthew’s Christology. In order to analyze how Matthew develops the Christology, we have to cut the infancy narrative into sections. This paper will discuss background information of the writing of this Gospel, literary elements of Jesus’ miraculous conception that reinforce his Jewishness, how Magi and literary devices help to understand Matthew’s Christology, what important biblical hero the infancy narrative parallels, and what foreshadowing is caused from this infancy narrative. Comparatively, the use of divine intervention in dreams to fulfill prophecy has been a key focus of the infancy narrative in order to create an unusual birth narrative and develop the unique Christology that Matthew envisioned specifically for the Jewish Messiah.

Correspondingly, some similarities throughout the four gospels of the act Anointing at Bethany was how the story outline was set up; it was during dinner, the woman comes in, the woman anointed Jesus, someone gets mad and Jesus defends her. Despite, what truly make the gospels different and each from a unique viewpoint is their differences. For example, Matthew, Mark and John’s location is at Simon the leper’s house, making Luke’s gospel the only different one, because it was at the Pharisee's house, name Simon. Also, Matthew and Mark the ointment she poured was over Jesus’ head, in contrast to Luke and John where she poured the ointment on his feet. Moreover, in Matthew’s gospel the “disciples” got mad. “But when the disciples saw it, they were indignant, saying, ‘Why this waste?” (Matt. 26:8) and Mark’s gospel “some” got mad. “But there were some who said to themselves indignantly, ‘Why was the ointment thus wasted?” (Mark 14:4) and Luke’s gospel the “Pharisees” got mad. “Now when the Pharisee who had invited him saw it, he said to himself, ‘If this man were a prophet, he would have known who and what sort of woman this is who is touching him, for she is a sinner.’” (Luke 7:39) and lastly, John’s gospel “Judas” got mad. “But Judas Iscariot one of his disciples (he

Beare, Francis Wright. "Mission of the Disciples and the Mission Charge: Matthew 10 and Parallels." Journal of Biblical Literature, vol. 89, no. 1, Mar. 1970, pp. 1-13.

Logically it would make sense to start off with the introduction of each book. Notice how in Matthew the first event mentioned is the birth of Jesus and his genealogy while John begins with the creation of the world. The first sentence, “An account of the genealogy of Jesus the Messiah, the son of David, the son of Abraham” (M 1:1) ultimately gives Jesus credibility. This credibility is something Matthew views as important because

In both of the books of Matthew and Mark the stories are almost the same. They both tell the story of woman coming to the home of Simon the Lepar her actions and how the other guest felt about her actions. The books also delve into the betrayal of Judas and the events leading up to the actual betrayal.

This research assignment aims to analyse and interpret an influential part of the New Testament – Mark's Gospel. An analysis of Mark and his community will be discussed as well as interpreting Jesus' teachings and his significant theme of Discipleship as it was then and in present society.

While the Synoptic Gospels, comprised of Matthew, Mark and Luke are primarily three retellings of the same story, each writer’s narrative seems to be geared to different audiences. Mark, who did not actually travel with Jesus, but was a disciple of Peter, has a distinction that the other two do not. While all three gospels are accurate and complete, the book of Mark, written according to the preaching of the Peter, gives the reader a more personal experience of the gospel of Jesus Christ.