How Did The California Strengthen The Women's Suffrage Movement?

The battle for suffrage was a long and slow process. Many women tried to initiate the fight for suffrage, like Alice Paul and Lucy Burns. “These were the New Suffragists: women who were better educated, more career-oriented, younger, less apt to be married and more cosmopolitan than their previous generation.” (pg 17) Eventually, in 1920, the 19th amendment was ratified; allowing women to vote, but it was not any one person or event that achieved this great feat. It was the confluence of certain necessary factors, the picketing and parades led by Alice Paul, militaristic suffrage parties and the influence of the media that caused the suffrage amendment to be passed and ratified in 1920. But most importantly, they successfully moved both

The Women’s Suffrage Movement of the 1920’s worked to grant women the right to vote nationally, thereby allowing women more political equality. Due to many industrial and social changes during the early 19th century, many women were involved in social advocacy efforts, which eventually led them to advocate for their own right to vote and take part in government agencies. Women have been an integral part of society, working to help those in need, which then fueled a desire to advocate for their own social and political equality. While many women worked tirelessly for the vote, many obstacles, factions, and ultimately time would pass in order for women to see the vote on the national level. The 19th Amendment, providing women the right to vote, enable women further their pursuit for full inclusion in the working of American society.

The lack of success of the movements for women’s suffrage in achieving their aims by 1918 cannot be held accountable to solely one reason due to the abundance of causes for this. Voting, however, was not the only area where women were subjected to inequitable treatment: in1850 women were regarded as second class citizens. It was common belief that their brain was smaller than their male peers and they were therefore provided with very little or no form of education which, consequentially, meant that jobs for women were unskilled and low paid. Many professions would not employ a female as it was considered that a woman’s place was in the home. Politics was an additional area where women were uninvolved. Political parties (except

During the 1850’s the women’s rights movement in the United States continued to build, but lost momentum when the Civil War began. After the war ended, the 14th and 15th Amendments to the Constitution were drafted and ratified; protection to all citizens - with the term “citizens” defined as male, and suffrage for black men, respectively. The drafting of the 15th Amendment caused animosity with women’s rights activists and led them to believe that this was their chance to push lawmakers for truly universal suffrage. They “allied

Up until the 1920s, women’s struggle for their right to vote seemed to be a futile one. They had been fighting for their suffrage for a long time, starting numerous women's rights movements and abolitionist activists groups to achieve their goal. “The campaign for women’s suffrage began in earnest in the decades before the Civil War. During the 1820s and 30s, most states had enfranchised almost all white males (“The Fight for Women's Suffrage” ). This sparked women to play a more emphatic role in society. They began to participate in anti-slavery organizations, religious movements, and even meetings where they discussed that when the Constitution states "that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain

S. is an immigrant from Russia and a successful businessman who runs a garment factory. Since he started his work on an Atlanta textile shop floor, he would have worked with many female factory workers and witnessed their conditions of life. He also has three daughters. He is a widower so that he may be more involved in his daughters’ daily lives due to the absence of his wife. Taking the mother’s role in the house could have an impact on the Mr. S.’s view on the advocate of women’s rights including enfranchisement for women. However, on the other side, he has recently expanded his business interests into liquor industry. The liquor companies in the 1920’s did not want to agree on giving the suffrage to women because they considered the women’s suffrage as a threat to their business. If Mr. S. was considering the partnership in a brewery seriously, he could have the same thought about the enfranchisement for women, considering it as a major threat to his new business. Nevertheless, if he was a good father who wanted to make a change on his three daughter’s future lives, he would agree on the opinions that pursues the equality with men in terms of suffrage. Mr. S. could be swayed by Susan B. Anthony’s speech, “Woman’s Right to Vote”, which claims equal suffrage based on abstract justice. However, since he has working experiences with female workers, he would more likely be swayed by the Florence Kelley’s speech, which claims equality with men, especially for wage-earning women. Also, he could have taken the mother’s role in the house for his daughters, and realized that mothers need to vote to protect their children and make the community a better place to live. In this view, Mr. S. will agree with Carrie W. Clifford who claims that “Votes for Women” is really a campaign for “Votes for Children.”

During the Reconstruction era, supporters of women’s rights employed a legislative and organizational means in their battle for equal rights and suffrage. The successes and failures experienced by the 14th and 15th amendments helped shape the landscape of the American suffrage movement that culminated in the 19th amendment. The assigned readings addresses the legislative and organizational avenues that were actively utilized by advocates of women’s rights and suffrage, albeit in slightly different ways. The two readings align well with each other, each bringing an unique perspective of a significant historical phrase within the women’s rights movement in the United States.

     Although they were fighting for a worthy cause, many did not agree with these women’s radical views. These conservative thinkers caused a great road-block on the way to enfranchisement. Most of them were men, who were set in their thoughts about women’s roles, who couldn’t understand why a woman would deserve to vote, let alone want to vote. But there were also

“While the word suffrage, derived from the Latin “Suffragium,” simply refers to the right to vote, the modern connotation specifically calls to mind the women’s suffrage movements of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Part of the larger social movement of Women’s Rights and the fight for equality within patriarchal societies , the Women’s Suffrage Movement in the United States spans a seventy-two year period” (Dolton 31)The campaign for women’s suffrage began in the decades before the Civil War. During the 1820s and 30s, most states had extended the franchise to all white men, regardless of how much money or property they had. During this same time, many reform groups across the United States–temperance

As a woman, I am grateful to all the strong female activists that have paved the way that has allowed all United States female citizen’s the rights we have today.

Long before the women’s suffrage movement began picketing in front of the White House on January 10, 1917, women had begun the battle for the right to vote at a women’s rights conference in 1848 at Seneca Falls. At the Seneca Falls conference, women pressed for the right to vote based on the grounds of equal opportunities and justice for women. During this time in American History, we will learn about the roles that several influential women played in the battle for their right to vote. The women’s suffrage movement played an important role in American History, and it was just the beginning of a long battle that women fought to improve their roles in society.

Despite great advances, opposition was still quite prominent throughout the world. Many would think that all women would be in support of women’s independence and rights, but that is not entirely true. Lots of conservative women went out of their way to band together and unite making a voice loud enough to be heard that they wanted things to stay the way they were, with women at the bottom of the social hierarchy. The group of women opposing women’s rights were small but still prominent for they reached far distances to put their opinion out to the public and those who had place in politics. Specifically speaking on women’s suffrage, conservative Women had a lot to say on why they shouldn’t be allowed to vote. Although they still believed women were not inferior to men, they believed it wasn’t right that women got to vote. Their main point was that they should only be represented in the ballots through their sons and husbands whom they have brought up and raised correctly to make votes that benefitted both the men and women of the country. These women who opposed suffrage had high religious influences, believing that men and women were created with certain roles in this world. Essentially the role of a man was to support the family and make big decisions, leading the household. In contrast, a woman’s role was to hold down the fort whenever the man was away and provide any housewife/nurse duties,

Kathleen Bowen, author of A time for Courage , wrote a book about women who were willing to give up their comfort to stand up for what they believed in. Women would stand outside in the cold and boycott for women’s rights to vote. Men wouldn’t offer them coffee nor for them to come in a warmer place because they didn’t care to hear what was said about the right to vote, women were each other's support system . Kathleen had stated “ They said they would only come in to talk about the federal amendment for the women’s right to vote . No coffee ! This made me think of Sojourner Truth’s words about men who help lift women’s carriages…. That of course is the easy part , just like giving them coffee. Giving them the right to vote is the hard part “ Kathleen was basically saying men would give women anything else but the right to vote , they didn't want women to have authority to say how they felt and to voice their own opinion (Bowen) . This leads to many more situations that dealt with women’s

ONE: My purpose in writing this essay in one sense is a reminder to myself and to anyone reading it that among the lesser known and yet enormously impactful injustices of the U.S. is the fact that it took 144 years from the time of the Declaration of Independence to 1920 when the 19th Amendment to the Constitution was put in place. In those 144 years there were august debates about freed slaves' rights to vote; and of course there was a bloody war over states' rights. But women's voting rights were shoved under the rug until there was sufficient agitating and organizing by people like Susan Anthony and Lillie Blake, who worked "for twenty years to have policewomen hired in New York City" and then battled for more years for policewomen to receive fair pay and benefits (Farrell, 2006, p. 49). This was educational for me.

A number of aristocrat-class women and men opposed suffrage rights for female in order to protect their own economic standings. Individuals from this particular social class were owners or high ranking officials of industrial corporations and textile factories in the urbanized northeastern region of US. They faced economic losses because the labor unions would push for local to state reforms by taking striking actions to mend any mistreatment that they experienced. Thus, this aristocrat-class perceived the suffrage movement as threat because if women achieved the right to vote, then as a citizen of the nation─ she has the legal right to push for reform in her working place. It is essential to note that majority of the leading members of the labor unions were men who were not as interested in advocating for women 's position in working grounds. Moreover, the anti-suffragists viewed women 's enfranchisement as a threat because the suffragists promised that voting rights would directly lead to an increase in the wage that women were paid. The corporate owners would hire young women between the ages of seventeen and twenty-four and pay them lower wages than their male peers. This implies that women 's voting right would only endanger the economic standings of the aristocrat-class women and men.