The World Is A Complex Changing Environment

You will address Total Army Analysis, the process that takes us from the Army of today to the Army of the future.

The process the U.S. Army utilizes to fill the units they design with personnel to fight and win the nation's wars, equipment to own the air and the night, money to put fuel into the vehicles and bullets in the weapons, and facilities to house the soldiers and their families in is the Acquisition process. The army cannot continue without new soldiers to fill its ranks or weapons and bullets to destroy the enemy, this phase is the building block for the Army Organizational Life Cycle Model and helps dictate training and the rest of the model forward.

In 2012, General Dempsey states “Mission Command is fundamentally a learned behavior to be imprinted into the DNA of a profession of arms.” The way Mission Command has evolved through the past years is indicative to the US Military adjusting to a new threat. The concept of Mission Command is not new, what is important is how General Dempsey states “Education in the fundamental principles of mission command must begin at the start of service and be progressively more challenging..” The General emphasizes the need for education at the start of the individual’s service. Additionally, this highlights the United States Army’s doctrinal adjustment to the new threat. During the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, the US faced an enemy whose creativity and adaptability are two of its greatest assets. The fast-paced situation changes in both of those AOs required tactical level leadership maintain the autonomy to “exercise disciplined initiative.” This type of initiative historically leads to mission success, specifically in fast-paced situations where a key to success is forcing the enemy to react.

The increase in technology and intelligence will play a crucial role in the development of the Army. Gen. Milley hit on some important notes in regards to unit effectiveness with these changes. The most difficult question discussed revolves around the how to ease armed conflict. The delivery methods of conflict are evolving and have the potential to completely transform warfare. Also discussed within the same context was the standards of national interest. Furthermore, the implementation of robotics creates a potential for warfare to completely be redefined.

This paper will explore the significance of the “One Army, Indivisible” theme while providing an in depth look at each component of the Army that makes up the Total Force. “One Army, Indivisible “is the Army’s theme for the 2017-2018 fiscal year. This year’s theme focuses primarily on the Total Force of the Army, while drawing strength and character from the four other components that make up the Total Force. Per the Center for the Army Profession and Ethic Release, “One Army Indivisible” is an important concept because each element of the team makes an essential contribution to the Total Army’s ability to provide for the ethical design, generation, support and application of land power.” (2016)

Summary: In this article the authors are addressing future leaders, and they immediately inform the reader that because there is more complexity considerably more complex issues and technologies than a century ago in the operational military environment, there is a great need for military leaders to achieve autonomy in terms of adapting to and learning about the evolving environment. In short, leaders must be smarter and better prepared for a changing world.

Regionally Aligned Brigades/Forces is the vision of the Chief of Staff of the Army and the Secretary of the Army that will provide combatant command with constantly readily available troops that are versatile and responsive. Regionally Aligned Forces are based on an organizing principle that allows the United States (U.S.) Army to provide units that maintain core war-fighting skills complimented with cultural awareness training, language training, and regional expertise. A revised ARFOGEN cycle based on Active Component and 60-month Reserve Component sequence will replace the current Army model. Mission specific training requirements will be communicated, based on combatant command’s require¬ments, and organized through FORSCOM. These

Force management, or what is really otherwise known as planned comprehensive change, is in reality a complex and interwoven process. Though it was designed within the confines of a systemic approach referred to as the DOTMLPF (Doctrine, Organization, Training, Materiel, Leadership & Education, Personnel and Facilities), in reality it is meant to enable both dutiful and well-thought out change as well as faster, more urgent adjustments in accordance with the evolving nature of war and information gathering tactics. The Army, as one branch involved in this initiative, focuses most of its attention in this regard on the organizational sector because of the way it facilitates an adequate and democratic step-by-step system of review (Student Reader, F102:2). But the fact is that even this initiative remains multi-faceted and appears to be rather bureaucratic in nature (it has five phases, which seems antithetical to an urgent change process), which might not be surprising since implementing the type of changes that are demanded can have major implications of all sorts. Still, it does appear that this concentration is being well received and that it will eventually serve its goal even if it does not appear that way when detailed on a point by point basis.

The Army Strategic Planning Guidance 2014 and the Army Posture Statement to Congress provides the concept concerning the adaptive Army leaders’ development. The United States Army Training and Doctrine Command Analysis Center (TRAC) and the Center for Army Lessons Learned (CALL) could support the leaders’ development through the analysis of the current leadership issues within the operations and prediction for the upcoming needs as

The United States Military faces many challenges engaging in conflicts around the world. Stretched thin, the elements of war evolves from AirLand Battle to Unified Land Operations. From the Cold war to Operation Iraqi Freedom the way of the military is winning on offense, winning decisively, while maintaining the initiative.

The United States Army is undergoing a period of transition as it seeks to build and maintain a flexible force. As a result, the organization is studying potential changes to its structure and composition of its brigade combat teams. As part of the ongoing analysis to explore alternatives between three-battalion and two-battalion brigade compositions, the organization is considering the possibility of examining the entire force in design and structure. The need for such changes has been fueled by the growing need for improvement of security forces as they tackle threats to national security. In addition to this, there have been various calls for initiatives that are geared towards changing the United States Army officer culture through management rather than understanding process. Through a process of understanding instead of management, the U.S. Army officer culture will shift from mere risk aversion to uncertainty intolerance.

As stewards of our profession, commanders ensure that military expertise continues to develop and be passed on to aspiring professionals through operational development. It is during this developmental phase that Professional Soldiers put their knowledge and skills to the test. Operational Army units certify and recertify their Professional Soldiers through repetitive and realistic training events including the Combat Life Saver Course, platoon live fires, and exercises at the National Training Center. In the course of these challenging and realistic experiences, the Army’s operational units develop Soldiers and leaders prepared to maintain high standards, discipline, and operational readiness. Operational development and adaptability will continue to drive changes in Army doctrine, organization, leadership, and education as we enter the post-war era. Without this kind of development, the Army could not maintain a well-disciplined professional fighting force.

The United States Army is an organization that protects and defends against all enemies foreign and domestic. This protection extends to the American people and the democratic intuitions that we believe in. Enabling this process to work within its design structure is essential for continual trust in the United States

The Army has transformed several times during its history. Adapting to the operational environment is a necessity for the force called upon to prosecute its adversaries. The Army must do what is necessary to protect the U.S. against all enemies, and advance the national interests of the American people. To accomplish this, anticipation of threats is crucial and victory against its adversaries is an imperative. The nation relies on the military for strategic level deterrence and expects that it will be decisive in combat operations. For the military to be successful, it is important that transformation adapt to meet these expectations by conforming to the requirements of a successful force of the future in order meet any new threats in

The United States military is comprised of many sectors of workforce like the Marines, Army, Air Force, Navy, and Coast Guard. Each position has a different area of expertise needed in order to be successful at the job the person will be doing. Multiple years of bootcamp and training are required in order to get on the battlefield and fight for the people of the United States of America. Once admitted, soldiers will begin to learn how to use different types of weaponry and tools in order to be dominant on the battlefield against the enemy. Technology is integrated in this stage of a soldier's learning. This is a vital learning stage for a soldier because military technology not only gives troops an edge over enemies, but also provides a tremendous