The World War II ( Wwii ) Essay

Many critics of the atomic bombing have concluded that the destruction of civilian lives caused by the bombs could have very well been avoided by seeking out alternative methods of attack. In the Theory

World War II World War II was a pivotal event of the 20th century and a defining

Before and during the Second World War people were fascinated with flight, the speed and the idea of flying high in the sky has kept people interested. Bombers and fighters alike both change dramatically in the twenty years after the Great War. From cloth wings to metal wings planes became bigger, faster, agile, and can hold a lot more fire power. The air war has changes significantly since the First World War. During the First World War bombers played a big role in the air war and after it left many questions whether it is the way to win wars. There has been speculation that future wars would be won by bombers and it can crush and the enemies at home and also the soldiers. Both book, Wartime by Fusslle and Why the Allies Won by Overy explain in depth what was the actual outcome of bombers and their roles before and after the war.

Although atomic bombs may be seen as a “ruthless annihilation of cities” (Leo Szilard, p. 5), they are also an effective means of war. The use of atomic bombs in war have both position and negative consequences however; Leo Szilard’s “A Petition to the President of the United States” is a successfully articulated article on why he felt atomic bombs should not be used against Japan. Leo Szilard effectively uses pathos and logos to support his position on atomic bombs to the President. He also successfully offers countermeasures that reinforce the negativity surrounding the use of these bombs. While people may disagree with Leo Szilard’s position, his use of pathos and logos makes it a successful article.

Strategic warfare was an attack that was very effective. The countries who developed these methods won many major battles due to the advantage and the power they had. The bombs were able to be dropped on the enemies allowing the good side to gain victory without putting men on the ground(Robert Curley para.2). As the war went on, countries looked for ways to improve the weight and size of bombs and rockets. Rockets became battery powered, allowing them to be lighter and

The dropping of the Atom Bomb is one of many historical events of the World War II. The Atom Bomb was dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, two Japanese cities. The two nuclear bombs were dropped by the Americans at the end of the war, more specifically on August 6th and August 9th in 1945. The reason for these events is to this day, not clearly understood by many, but for the Americans it was believed to be the best way to end the war. The attack being so controversial, in this paper, I will give my view on this harmful event and I will attempt to explain the different arguments used to justify the dropping of the weapons on these two cities.

World War II was an event that shook the world, creating an era of stress and adversity. Even in such a difficult time, the world continued to grow and develop during the end of the war, benefiting the Allied powers and helping them get out of the war. The end of World War II was an era of highly significant major events, miraculous breakthroughs in technology and science, and political views and actions.

The harbinger of Death was finally at the command of humankind. The arguably darkest days of armed conflict, characterized by the brightest of lights, was a result of unlocking the power of the atom. In an instant and a flash, at the Trinity test site, the nuclear age was born. The United States Army had its bomb, but the bomb was just the beginning. The United States Army Air Forces realized not only the tactical advantage of wielding such power, but the most effective means of exercising that power. The inception of the 509th Composite Group, 1st Atomic Bombardment coupled with the advent of the B-29 Superfortress offered the United States the means to devastate Japan, destroy their will to fight, and ultimately silence the Japanese

On the 6th of August 1945, America dropped the first ever atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima. Three days later, the second and last atomic bomb ever used was dropped again by the U.S.A. on Nagasaki in Japan. Since these events, there has been great controversy over the necessity of using such extreme measures to wipe out whole cities, which resulted in numerous disastrous short-and-long-term effects. Throughout this essay, both sides of this argument will be considered and examined.

World War II was one of the most deadly wars we know in history, having as many as sixty million casualties, most of whom were civilians. It impacted a lot of countries, almost all the world, which is why the name is given. This war impacted many countries in the world, and damaged almost all of the countries involved greatly. It also led to the downfall of Western European countries as world powers, leaving it to the Soviet Union, and the United States. The war started in 1939 and ended in 1945, with the invasion of Poland and the Axis surrender, respectively. It changed the economy and the growth of big countries, including Germany, Great Britain, United States, Japan, Russia and France. Aside from this, Jews were greatly influenced

Before the war started, there was no law that forbade aerial bombing of cities as the Hague conventions of 1897, and 1907 which outlined the codes of wartime conduct at land and sea had not been updated to include air warfare. Despite FDR’s early attempts to convince both sides of the table to agree to target military assets exclusively, political, industrial , and civilian infrastructures were soon targets of the strategic bombing plans used by the Axis as well as the Allied powers to destabilize ,cause chaos, and instill terror among the populations. Whereas in the past conflicts mainly took their course on the battlefields with civilians out of harm’s way, this time the Allied, and Axis war machines were directed at each other’s civilian hubs to bleed each other into submission. With world war 2 came a new era of warfare. With new technology, and new strategies, the world would witness devastation on a scale the likes

Around seventy eight years ago, World War Two was inevitable and would last for six years, while becoming one of the world’s greatest conflicts. With the catastrophic effects of The Great War, the further advancement of current technology and the advent of newer warfare, World War Two was set to be the turning point of the twentieth century. The war caused the Berlin wall to separate Germany, it indirectly caused the Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union. World War Two’s legacy includes The Holocaust, the bombing of Pearl Harbor, and the first use of atomic bombs. The United States’ use of the first atomic bombs has great complications, however the act is justified because of Japan’s reluctance to surrender, the amount of

“The world must know what happened, and never forget.” (World War 2) General Eisenhower reflecting upon the world war II, and acknowledging it as a pertinent event in the history of the United States of America. War is war, it is not pretty or humane, but what it is, is a diplomatic way in which to settle disputes and aggressions between countries. By analyzing these wars of the past, the people of the country can learn many things, be it mistakes made by one side, strategy from someone else or battle field etiquette. And it is through this analysis that the human race is able to further itself to not repeat the mistakes made by their ancestors. There are many lessons to be learned from looking at the

Following the devastation of trench warfare during World War I, early airpower theorist believed strategic bombing could be the new way to win wars and reduced the number of lives lost. Theorist like, Guilio Douhet, Hugh Trenchard, and William “Billy” Mitchel became pioneers and advocates of strategic bombing. They believed striking the enemy’s troops, war-marking industry, and vital centers would produce a decisive victory. The airpower theory would be a key element to the Allies strategy in Second World War (WW2). Leaders in Britain and the United States believed Germany was a greater threat than Japan. Thus, the airpower strategy of the European theater of operation became the primary focus. Allied airpower was decisive in the European

These strategists’ thought shaped British aerial warfare policy. For example, Douhet says, “bombing objectives should always be large; small targets are unimportant and do not merit our attention here.” Also, Douhet model addresses aerial punishment to inflict considerable pain on enemy civilians to shatter their morale. RAF put his model into practice during WWII. In that case, British focused on morale of German workers. The British bombing campaign was chiefly waged by night by large numbers of heavy bombers. British knew that to influence into deep Germany territory was tough and daylight precision bombing had also much more difficulties. In addition, Royal Air Force’s accuracy in bombing was very low during the interwar period. For instance, in March 1932, only half of the Royal Air Force bombs hit the right target. In that respect, British continued in night attacks and the majority of the attacks on cities. British thought was that general area offensive would affect considerably war effort. But, there was not agreement in royal air force about targeting priority. British officials criticized due to negative moral effects, and political risks. While British air staff emphasized loyalty and mutual respect, chief of bomber point out if the Germans were asked today oil plant or cities they would reply bomb anything you fancy expect cities. British air staff concerned