The World 's Ideal Position

Abortion continues to make a profound impact on public policies and remains one of the most controversial debate of our time. Though abortion continues to be a debate, it was not always a problematic one. Abortion has been present throughout history dating back to the ancient Egyptians, Greek and Roman. Before abortion became a crime in the 19th century, abortion was a womans choice. “Before abortion became the object of law, it was a subject of everyday life” (Roe v Wade BOOK p. 11). From early civilizations to today, abortion was and may still serve as a form of birth control. It has been observed that through abortion those of upper class avoided “unwanted childbearing and the lower classes used it to limit family size when 1 or more child

It may be said in all soberness that professional reliefers and most other indigents who produce children thereby commit crimes against humanity which are fully as serious as many acts now considered felonies. They have no moral right to produce such children and therefore should have no legal right to immunity from punishment that constructively fits the crime, such as some form of painless sterilization of both guilty parents, which would be permanent.

The current generation is quizzical of the importance that religious teachings hold in our evolving pro-choice society. In past generations, spiritualism was a method of uniting the community and nurturing the young. However, we find that faith has the adverse effect. While separate from other religions, a rise in hate fueled discrimination and separatism is observable between different communities in all corners of the globe. In this generation, it is only logical that as religion is taught, after learning from present and past events, the very essence of the teachings is skewed and put into question.

In chapter 4 we revisit the authors’ argument that, when Roe V. Wade legalized abortion in 1973 many pregnancies were terminated in the U.S. that would otherwise have led to the birth of “unwanted children”. These children, born under less than ideal circumstances, would have been more likely to commit crimes when grown. Therefore, removing them pre-emptively from the population led to our lowered crime rates. One of the most controversial points of discussion in the book , first presented in the introductory chapter, is reintroduced slowly and by way of Romania.

The main objective for this was “well raised and genetically superior” children to be born in the next generation (Canada’s human rights history, n.d). Alberta was one among the few provinces that legalized sterilization known as the sexually sterilization act due to many reasons like anti-immigration motive or objection to federalization. Sterilization was usually allowed in certain grounds of undesirable physical and mental conditions which had the fear of inheriting and for the people who was judged as unsuited to raise and bare children. Now among Canadian married couples, where the wife is over the age of 35, nearly two-third of them are protected by sterilization (Balakrishnan,

In the United States during the 1920’s, the welfare of society was in jeopardy due to the number of feebleminded. With such a high number, the risk that these undesired genes would be passed on to future generations of offspring was a leading concern for scientific figures of the time. Whether or not this statement was actually the case, it was widely believed at the time. It was felt that the only logical way to ensure a better future for the rest of society was to segregate this class of impaired citizens apart from others. Sterilization, which was supported by many, became the best known solution to this rising problem during this time period (Cynkar 1981). Buck vs Bell is an example of the fight against sterilization laws that ultimately made its way to the United States Supreme Court. Many states had eugenic laws that were in force long before the Supreme Court case, but revisions were made after the ruling of Buck vs. Bell (Nourse 2016). Historically, this court case rested on many issues that were seen as acceptable at the time, but by today’s standards are considered consciously wrong. The majority opinion regarding the legalization for sterilization from the iconic court case Buck vs. Bell still remains in effect today, but the misrepresentation of constitutional rights and ethical questions posed by this case are altogether still a question that remains up for debate. Unfortunately for Carrie Buck, and many like her, the consequences are and will remain

The paper, “The Immorality of Having Children”, by Stuart Rachels provides insight as to why it is wrong to raise children by supporting the Famine Relief Argument. Rachels argues that the cost of raising a child today, over two-hundred thousand, is so staggering that it would be better spent on donations towards famine relief projects. Throughout the paper, Rachels provides substantial arguments that emphasize the point that having children is the biggest decision that someone will ever make in their life rather than what to believe or whether to get married, and the decision should not be taken lightly. All the arguments presented are persuasive, but the argument is flawed overall because it never takes into account the importance of

Who inhabits the world? Can we really create the best race and are it determined by our genes? The study of Eugenics raises a lot of unresolved question still in the year of 2015 as this topic expands. Eugenics, also known as selective breeding has been an exceptionally disputable science that has existed in this world for quite a long time. Eugenics (genetic counseling) is characterized as the study of or assurance in the probability of enhancing the characteristics of the human species or a human populace by such means as disheartening a person to procreate because he/she have hereditary defects or risked to have inheritable undesirable qualities or permitting reproduction by persons attempted to have inheritable desirable traits. These are qualities that individuals in the public eye at the time considered "unfit". They incorporate the “unfit” to be alcoholics, being a criminal or prostitutes, those with a mental impairment, feeble minded and those with physical impairments. To battle this, individuals accepted that the choice to procreate ought to be controlled by more "fit" human.

These "science"-based eugenic influences break through the lines of science in to the world of politics, promulgating anti-humanistic views of poor women of colour in the form of legislation fraught with bigotry and baseless generalizations. This political view flows through the judicial system, as courts apply eugenic philosophies in determining who should be sterilized and for what reasons.

Charles Darwin, an English naturalist, created the theory of evolution. Known as Darwinism, this theory basically states that all species arise and develop through the natural selection, increasing individual’s ability to compete and survive. This paper will outline how Darwinism was used to classify some as inferior, how Social Darwinism and Eugenics shaped the immigrant experience in America, and why fundamentalist Christians opposed Darwinism. Survival of the fittest is one way to define Darwinism. This attitude could make some individuals feel inferior and unsubstantial compared to others who were stronger, smarter, more attractive, and able to respond to change.

Now, it’s 2015. You, and your yellow-sundress-clad girlfriend, or patterned-button-up-wearing boyfriend, have finally been engaged. After marriage, and perhaps a few years of wanderlust, you begin to contemplate how soon you two should be starting a family. But it’s not 1542 anymore. Nowadays, death is an ordeal saved exclusively for the elderly. The world is different. Society is different. The economy is different. And the problems that once were far, far off on the horizon are now here. We are on the horizon we had thought to be so far off. As the population nears its bursting point, all members of society must begin to consider an interesting set of new moral questions. Above all, individuals must discover their role in the perpetuation of our

A second objection that carries a lot of force is that “…we could never adequately, reasonably, and fairly enforce…” a parent licensing program (Lafollette 1980, 193). This objection carries so much force because a couple can conceive babies without the help of anyone else. Due to this fact it would be impossible to control unauthorized babies because there is no fair way to enforce such a law without harming the innocent child.

In Stanley Benn’s “Egalitarianism and Equal Consideration of Interests”, it is explained that animals and human imbeciles are distinguished not because of fundamental inequality, but solely on the basis that the two subjects are of different species. In regard to animals’ moral rights and the infringement of those rights due to the practice of speciesism, Singer employs a utilitarian style of argument to defend animals’ moral rights; in short, the interests of each being which is involved should be taken into consideration and said interests should be given the same weight as that of another being. Speciesism is morally wrong because it attempts to assign undeserved weight to the interests of beings of separate species, solely based off the difference of species. Naturally, or rather unnaturally, human beings have always awarded themselves the utmost importance due to the idea of human dignity, as in humans occupy the central spot within any earthly ranking. Logically, Singer argues that the practice of speciesism is wrong because the conditions in which it exists are synonymous to the conditions which facilitate racism and sexism, before they had been recognized as

Laws are legislated and enforced for the mere purpose of protecting all individuals in a society by stating what is and what is not acceptable behavior. Though it is impossible for these legislative decisions to please every single individual in a society, these governs are passed in morality of the thousands of elected parties in charge. Commercial surrogacy is a current complex issue that evokes strong moralistic response. Commercial surrogacy takes away the childbearing element in the reproductive period for individuals looking to have or extend a family. It has opened the doors for many who cannot bear children of their own though this behavior has also raised many concerns about the appropriate scope of the market. This “method for acquiring children” is more commonly objected because the children and women’s reproductive ability are being treated as a commodity. Summed up through Elizabeth S. Anderson’s article, “Is Women’s Labor a Commodity?” children are buyer durables and women are baby factories (Anderson 82). Anderson communicates commercial surrogacy children as commodities stating how this “market” that these children are born into expresses attitude that endorses market norms as opposed to ‘norms of parental love”(Anderson 76). Anderson focuses her paper towards the manipulation, alienation, and exploitation of women that commodifies women’s reproductive capacities. Through Anderson’s argument and her perceptive relations of this market to alienation,

Every object on Earth was either created naturally or by humans. Grass and trees were both here long before beings but the scenic park humans go to enjoy these amenities were created by individuals. The trails people walk on to the playgrounds kids play on have all been created by persons. This is such an abstract idea: that humans themselves are what keeps this modern world moving. A necessity for this world are engineers as their skills range from designing the parks and trails to producing suitable weedicides for the grass. The most important aspect of the modern world is the technology that is advancing it. The capabilities of engineers regarding technology that keeps humanity alive or destroy it are the abilities in which engineers can harness and manipulate energy. The energy sources include both renewable and non-renewable resources and are the vital backbones of this modern world.