Zimpfer V. Palm Beach County Case Study

FACTS: Graham, 16 years old, was sentenced to three years' probation, with the first year to be served in the county jail. Less than six months after being released, he was arrested for a home-invasion robbery with two accomplices. After that, he was sentenced to life imprison without the possibility of parole.

This case analysis will covers the impact of the McKennon V. Nashville Banner Publishing Co Supreme Court Of The United States Decision in any legal dispute regulated by Age Discrimination In Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA) and others regulation that covers the elimination of discrimination in the workplace, the contribution to payback calculation procedure in this type of legal suit, as well as impact in the workplace environment. The Court held in McKennon established that the employer is

Over the last several decades, workplace issues have become an area of controversy for most employers. This is because the regulations surrounding what practices are considered to be discriminatory have increased dramatically. To enforce these issues, the Equal Opportunity Employment Commission (EEOC) is playing a central role in making employers follow these provisions of the law. A recent example of this occurred, with the case EEOC v. HCS Medical Staffing Inc.

Brooks Pharmaceuticals have to prove that discrimination against these employees was not because of their age. The dismissal of theses employees was solely based on their performance. Failure by the company to prove the fact, there would be legal problems for the organization.

Though Mr. Zimpfer’s attorney was able to get a report from an I/O psychologist, Dr. Josephs, which verifies his ability to perform the duties described in the ad for the managerial position, the county could also get its own expert to rebut this psychologist’s findings in the report. If Dr. Josephs is able to convince this jury then there is sufficient evidence to conclusively prove that Mr. Zimpfer was a victim of discrimination, since her report shows that he is clearly more qualified for the position than Mr. Merriman is.

The taking of land refers “to government seizure, regulation, or intrusion on private property for which the owner is entitled to compensations under the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution” (Halbert, Terry, Inguilli, & Elaine, 2012). There is also regulatory takings, which is the “newly enforceable restrictions on the use of ones property, such as a newly adopted restrictions on building in certain areas of wetlands.” (Halbert, Terry, Inguilli, & Elaine, 2012). All over the world governments take private land from its owners to benefit the public. In the United States it is called emanated domain, and has been a controversial issue till this day. By evaluating the case of Lucas V South Carolina Coastal Council of 1992 and evaluating the two types of regulatory action that automatically trigger compensation as takings; the dissent object to the takings approach laid out by the majority in this case; cities ability to take private property and transfer it to private developers for the sake of economic revitalization; the ethical issues surrounding the principle of using eminent domain to take away the property ownership rights of individuals; and the feeling I would have if the government was to take my land.

Individual rights versus the good of the community, is an issue that American has struggled with for a long time. In addition, the case of Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council Mr. Lucas contended that his two beautiful but fragile beachfront properties located in Barrier Islands were made worthless by the passage of the Beachfront Management Act. According to the Supreme Court, the Coastal Council was simply using its “police powers” to “protect our state’s unstable coastline from further erosion caused by construction.” (South Carolina Tribune)

On January, 23 1906 a white woman named Nevada Taylor was dropped off the bus station in Chattanooga, Tennessee at 6:30 p.m. only two and half blocks from her home. Little did she know she was being followed? A man grabbed her by the neck and drug her ten feet before throwing her over a fence. She screamed and struggled as he put a leather strap around her neck and threatened to cut her throat. Taylor accounts waking up about ten minutes later in torn and dirty clothes covered in bruises. Her doctor later confirmed she had been raped. She claimed to have never of saw the face of the attacker but he had a soft voice of a black man. During this time of prejudice, segregation and hatred towards Negros was just a way of life for the

During the economic turn-down of 2009 the EEOC started receiving more complaints about age discrimination which in turn lead them to have hearings about the impact the recession had on older workers. During their research, they discovered the age hiring practice of Texas Roadhouse that suggested a national wide practice of discriminating against workers 40 years or older. The EEOC tried mediation in their attempts to reach a settlement through a conciliation process. That conciliation process failed and the EEOC filed suit in 2011. This suit represented the largest age discrimination suit ever brought to trial and the defense for Texas Roadhouse suggested a substantial over reach by the EEOC.

Miami Dade County Court, Criminal Misdemeanors Division judge who hears the motion to suppress on behalf of the four defendants. Write an opinion finding whether the physical evidence and testimonial evidence are admissible at trial or not. And state the law that supports your ruling.

Facts: John Doe was arrested in Marion County in 2000 and convicted of two counts of child exploitation. A recent Indiana statute prohibits most registered sex offenders from using social networking websites, instant messaging services, and chat programs. He was released from prison in 2003 and was required to register as a sex offender under this Indiana law. John Doe, on behalf of a class of similarly situated sex offenders, challenges this law on First Amendment grounds and files suit against Marion County. The district court held that the law implicates Doe's

Eric McFarland, Sr. EEO Consultant submitted a draft Position Statement with attachments to the EEOC and the Minneapolis Department of Civil Rights (MDCR) in response to an external charge of discrimination based on age. The employee claims he was discriminated against based on his age, when after his position was eliminated, he was not the successful candidate in at least one of the positions he applied for.

Two weeks ago the Florida Gators hosted offensive lineman named Cleveland Reed, who is from Lakeland, Fl.

The legal issue in this case is disparate treatment based on an employee’s membership in a protected class, which, in this case, was based on the employee’s age. The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA) protects individuals 40 years of age and older. Judy F. Jones, the plaintiff, who is over 40 and a member of a protected class, argues that she received disparate treatment as a result of her age. The district court decided to grant summary judgment in favor of Oklahoma City Public Schools (“OKC”), dismissing her case. However, the appeals court does not agree with this decision and reprimands and reverses the ruling to the district court to be further reviewed.

GREENVILLE, S.C. - A 47-year-old sales leader with experience in the textile industry was unlawfully fired by Indian Land, S.C., textile manufacturer Keer America Corporation because of his age, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) charged in a lawsuit filed today.