The advantage and disadvantages of IFRS

Instead, in the over-seas markets, numerous countries require IFRS for the statutory financial reporting. As the result, the multinational companies located in the US will need to have the IFRS reports for their subsidiaries located in over-seas countries.

The first benefit of the conversion is comparability. Switching to IFRS would allow people to see various companies from different parts of world on the same plane. As willingness to trade increases, cross-border investment and integration of capital markets are easier with greater market liquidity and lower cost of capital. Investor bases would increase as the financial reports are becoming comparable. With better information, companies would be able to more effectively allocate their capital. Having one standard, however, does not guarantee comparability. With the same standard, practices and enforcement can differ considerably across firms and countries.

Despite those enormous advantages, it has been argued that IFRSS adoption lead to significant costs. The main argument is that IFRSs do not consider local needs and priorities as every country has their own ‘business environment, legal systems, cultures, language and political environment’ (Henderson and Peirson, 2000 cited from Malthus, S., 2004). However, to overcome this problem, IASB can accommodate flexible reporting standards that enable companies to choose alternatives that are more suitable for their external condition. It is opinion of some opponents of IFRS adoption that IAS is ‘insufficiently detailed’ (Uddin,M.S., 2005, p.4) that require accountants’ and auditor’ professional judgment. However, overly detail might be contra productive and not flexible in anticipating every changes and differences.

EFRAG already required all European countries adopt IFRS. Moreover, EFRAG want more non- EU countries can adopt IFRS. They disappointed with no strong support for IFRS in US from SEC. (Bouvier, 2012) IFRS and EFRAG have working together for many years. (Hamilton, 2013) They want to set up an international accounting standard for the world and make no different in the financial report.

UK’s IFRSs are designed to make it easier to compare the performance of organizations in different countries, rather than each country maintaining its own GAAP, which makes such comparisons difficult. All listed EU companies have been required to use IFRSs since 2005. The adoption of IFRSs by the private sector is expected to have various benefits for both companies and investors; including (1) UK’s IFRSs will remove the need for companies with foreign subsidiaries to translate the accounts for consolidation with the parent company accounts. Also (2) it will be easier for investors to make informed decisions about the performance of companies in different countries because of the increased transparency and a better understanding of financial statements.

The U.S is moving toward IFRS (Forgeas, 2008). In the near future, all US company may need to report financial statements under IFRS. This makes the adaptation of IFRS unavoidable. Recently, some large multinational

With reference to the measurement of tangible non-current assets, critically evaluate whether financial statements prepared using IFRS’s provide useful information. Use specific examples from the annual reports of FTSE 100 companies to illustrate your points.

Our aim in this paper is to analyse and justify the facts that support and object the main issue of whether the mandatory adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards have in fact increased Financial Reporting Quality.

International Reporting Standards (IFRS) are standards that are aimed as a global language that is common for affairs of business, to make sure that the accounts of the company can be understood and are of a certain standard that applies worldwide. IFRS are

The SEC has several aspects to consider when it comes to the adoption of IFRS in the United States. First, the SEC should consider the overall costs impact this will have on businesses. It is likely that it would cost billions of dollars in new reporting expenses for U.S corporations to implement IFRS. It would also require accounting firms to vastly change their education requirements. Second, the SEC’s main job is to protect investors from fraud on public exchanges. The commission must determine whether IFRS does a better job of protecting investors from unlawful activity.

International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), represent the norms that were introduced by IASB. Being an independent organization that was not operational to earn profits, IASB, also known as, International Accounting Standards Board, incepted IFRS to facilitate public companies around the globe. IFRS presented a framework that served as a guide for these corporations directing them on preparation and disclosure of the financial statements. The International Financial Reporting Standards offered general guidance to the seekers concerning the financial statements. The standards never strived to set industry specific reporting principles or regulations.

IFRS was created in 2001 with nearly the same objective as FASB, creating high caliber, effective, and efficient standards not just locally but globally. Their headquarters are in London, England. Within a 15 year span, almost 120 different countries have begun to follow and report under IFRS. By adopting IFRS, a business can present its financial statements on the same basis as its foreign competitors, making comparisons easier and allowing them to engage in different markets (IFRS, 2016). IFRS is seeking unity so it is easier to compare financial reports country to country. This will make companies marketable in foreign places and allow foreign competitors to easily enter different markets.

On February 24, the SEC unanimously agreed to publish a statement of continued support for a single set of high-quality global accounting standards. The SEC acknowledged that IFRS is best positioned to be the global standard. Even without a set conversion timeline from the SEC, IFRS has been affecting

With complete notion and awareness of how each country has their set of rules, “the goal of IFRS is to provide a global framework for how public companies prepare and disclose their financial statements” (Rouse, 2011). This view is meant to provide general guidelines, as well as international comparisons through conventional and edifying means. To bring broader and vivid objectives, IFRS replaced IAS, the older standards, in order to bring a more comprehensive and simplified accounting procedures.

The reason for this kind reporting is largely due to the nature of their main capital provider, the bank. The bank is not necessarily concerned with their positive future outlook, they are likely more concerned with their debt to income ratio, equity, and liabilities. This kind of accounting information gives a better estimate if the company will be able to sufficiently meet their new obligation in the form of bank financing.