The causes of court delays in Malta are attributable to legal culture and history. Do you agree?

Legitimacy of courts has long been an important factor in the judicial system. However, a more recent concern has been diversity. It is becoming increasingly important for the court to represent those who it serves. “The ECJ’s composition remains unreflective of the millions of black and migrant European Union citizens whom it serves”. Judgements of both the domestic courts of England and Wales along with the European Court of Justice, affect the everyday lives of all EU citizens – including those of minority and underrepresented groups. “Outcomes should not be influenced by considerations of political or financial consequences”. Independence is important as it is vital that each judge is able to decide cases solely on the evidence presented to them by the parties in court. Personal independence is always necessary to ensure that the judiciary as a whole of both the land or the community remains independent. In order for the courts to be fully independent, they must represent the diversity of the people and make decisions in accordance with the law with no other influences. With the growing influence of the government over the last century it has become increasingly important that the judiciary fulfils its responsibility to protect the public against unlawful acts of the government. What has therefore also become increasingly more important is the need for the judiciary to be completely independent from the government. The evidence suggests that the courts nowadays are not

Official courtrooms have a noteworthy part to play in the security of civil rights and liberties. While they may not be associated with the usage of these arrangements, they are the overseers of ethical quality in the public and this implies they can adhere to a meaningful boundary between where there is an infringement of a common right or freedom and how this might be cured. Courts should, in this way, be exceptionally vocal in tending to the issue of social liberties and freedoms and they ought not be benevolent with regards to curing the infringement of the same. I likewise believe that the courts have been traded off an awesome arrangement when managing issues identifying with the infringement of social liberties and freedoms. Cases are conveyed to court and they are frequently rejected for absence of adequate confirmation among different justification for expulsion. This is very terrible given the way that the nationals admire these courts to address their issues. I feel like legal foundations should be more radical in managing this issue and they should practice their autonomy too.

In this paper I will provide an analysis of a jury trial; my analysis will focus on the right of the defendant. I will articulate how a defendant 's rights at trial can be assured when it comes to The defendant’s right to a speedy trial, the defendant’s right to an impartial judge and the defendant’s right to an impartial jury.

Merit –compare and contrast the role of judges ,lawyers and lay people within the English courts.

* The author will determine courtroom groups, how the groups interact daily, and recommend changes to the groups. The author will also describe prosecutor roles and the cases he pursues. Finally, the author will elaborate on the funnel of criminal justice with the backlog among the courtroom group, the court system, give an example, and explain how to eliminate backlog cases.

Procedural fairness is an extremely important factor in achieving justice in the legal system. The importance of procedural fairness can be displayed through the case of Haneef v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2007) as there was a lack of procedural fairness applied, resulting in a lack of justice. Dr Haneef was suspected of terror related offences and subsequently held without charge for an excess of 12 days due to evidence linking him to a terrorist attack in Glasgow. This evidence was later proven incorrect. The links between Haneef and the suspected offences were not enough to go to trial. Dr Haneef was incarcerated for three weeks, two of which he was held in 23 hours isolation, after being wrongly convicted of a 'reckless association with terrorist groups.' His reputation was tainted and his VISA revoked, as well as his wife's without any reason for the cancellation. All of these actions during the investigation of Haneef show a lack of procedural fairness resulting in his unjust treatment. Justice was not achieved in the case of Haneef v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2007). This case reinforces the importance procedural fairness has in the legal system as it reflects the legal system not achieving justice when an individual is not treated with equal rights, opportunities and awareness of what is occurring. Therefore, the doctrine of procedural fairness is essential to achieving

In this task I shall compare and contrast the roles and functions of judges, lawyers and lay people in the English legal courts.

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial

Tarr, G. A. (2014). Judicial Process and Judicial Policymaking, 6th Edition. [MBS Direct]. Retrieved from

This important deal gave us the right to have fairness in court, have two parties, and lastly limit the government power. Every human being in the United States now have the right to receive a court date. The Magna Carta has gave the public the right to receive a court date if they have caused a crime. In the article “The Magna Carta, 1215”, it states that “a practice that resulted in uncertain schedules and indefinite delays in having a case heard.” This concludes that criminals

During this nation’s early history the criminal justice system was deeply intertwined and seemingly streamlined. This can be attributed to a number of factors. Possibilities include the number of crimes committed, the criminal justice systems stance on crime or volume of caseloads. A unique aspect of colonial era criminal justice was the process of sentencing, which was invariably associated to the process of conviction. This author finds the interconnectedness distinctive as judges during that period did not ordinarily hold separate and distinct sentencing proceedings in the

On observing the District Court a number of distinctions from the Local Courts were immediately made apparent. Without going in to detail about the actual structure of the courts, they seemed to fit more closely with the traditional schema of a typical courtroom. In particular the larger courtrooms with more facilities combined with the barristers and magistrates wearing their wig and robes seemed to instantly uphold the ideology of justice. It is interesting to note how appearances can automatically provide an impression that justice will be upheld. The

Contempt of court implies to the courts ' ability to punish individuals that might interfere with the course of justice and the court system. Criminal proceedings are acknowledged as being active through the 1981 act when an individual has been arrested without warrant; the grant of a warrant for arrest; the grant of a warrant to cite; or service of an indictment or other document specifying the charge. A Criminal proceeding will cease to be active when a verdict, sentence has been reached. Inference with the court system can take many forms, therefore there are grave contempt’s which could result in imprisonment of the editor or journalist. The essence of contempt ensures that an individual gets a fair trial; a part of the of the Human

This essay will discuss the role of the magistrate and jury in the English and Welsh legal decision-making process. It will assess both the advantages and disadvantages of both mechanisms and give an opinion on the contribution they make in the process.

Explain and critically consider the use of lay magistrates in the legal system of England and Wales.