The lady tasting tea experiment( Fisher, 1966) came about when a lady claimed that she could tell

8. Draw conclusions – Assuming that your experiment produced results identical to those seen in Table 4, would you reject or accept the hypothesis that you produced in question 3? Explain how you determined this.

Donnelly begins his presentation with a thought experiment involving the tossing of a coin and predicts the possibility of a certain series of results. When predicting the possibility of heads, tails, heads (HTH) or heads, tails, tails (HTT), I, like most of the audience, believed that the chance of either possibility was equal. However, I did not take into account the possibility of overlap and how HTH was more like to be achieved in an overlap. I also did not catch that the HTH could appear in clumps because of the overlapping (the third "H" in HTH is also the first "H" in the next HTH). There was also the

_____ Referring to Question #10 above, which of the following best describes why you might be cautious in relying on these results? (A) The sample size is too small to make any reliable inference about the entire population. (B) Silly questions sometimes generate silly responses, not true opinions. (C) The respondents may not be a representative sample of any population of interest. (D) Newspapers tend to skew results to fit their own agenda.

a. The sample size of this poll is 1,125 adults and was limited to those that reside in the United States. The margin of error is +/- 2.9 percentage points. Most political science research embraces the 95% level of confidence (Damore

There are two types of people that were asked to take a survey. First, the teachers and assistant teachers were asked to take an eight question survey. Secondly, the parents of young children were asked to take a ten question survey. Each survey was short and all multiple

The Journal of Comparative Psychology has one of Fragaszy 's studies where the Capuchins were studied in labs to try and find food hidden under cups. The first example of this is called matching to sample. There was a small stair set with two tiers; the bottom containing two different sized cups and the top tier having one cup matching one of the bottom two. The experimenter would (out of the monkeys view) put the food under the cup on the bottom tier that matched that of the top tier. The Capuchins then had

I think it is also worth noting that Green and Palmquist use the NES poll data in their study which bring us back to the first question which is how to accurately measure partisanship? If question asked by pools can heavily change the result of studies we need to know what question to ask when we are measuring short term variance and when we are measuring long term variance. I think the Gallup poll might be useful to measure the short term variance in macro partisanship and the NES and GSS poll might be effecting when it comes to long term shifts in partisanship. However these article failed to discuss the polls in general and find if the interviewed population is representative of the US population. Abramson and Ostrom also briefly talked about the effect telephone poll can have on polls result but it was discussed in depth. In last week Alan S. Gerber and Donald P. Green found positive effect of personal contract on voting. Doing interviews for polls might have better result than telephone

According to Nate Cohn of the The New York Times says “the poll is extremely and admirable transparent: It has published a data set and the documentation necessary to replicate the survey.” The poll appears to display a non-probability sampling method with the determine sample size

I strongly agree with all of the statements that I stated above. If the surveys had only been composed of those questions, the results have been the same to me. Honestly I don't know why but these statement seems like common sense to me to strongly

Presidental job approval rating polls are not given to the entire population of the United States. In other words, these polls are targeted towards specific groups. Who was surveyed for the poll? And how many? Adult citizens and registered voters were surveyed for the poll. 1,001 adult Americans were surveyed by interviews that occurred over telephone calls.

There were three hypotheses of the experiment. The first was, “we expect that demographic factors will predict the importance of taste, nutrition, cost, convenience, and weight control to individual persons”. This means that they (the scientist involved) believed that the personal characteristics (age, gender, income, and race) will affect the flavor of food, benefits

With approximately over three hundred seventeen million people in the United States, politicians seek for general opinions in order to make a popular change. Seeking for this information is primarily accomplished with public opinion polls. As each Individual desires favorable change, conducting these polls invites challenges. According to Jason Robert Jaffe, public opinion polls are either inaccurate or misleading. With various political issues existing, polls allow politicians to adjust legislation and their elections accordingly. Furthermore, public opinion polls grant politicians with valuable information in order to operate fairly and make the favorable adjustment.

This hypothesis relates to the experiment by saying how when different liquids were used, there were many different reactions. Proving the hypothesis is supported. The experiment could be done differently by using other powders, liquids, etc. This could cause many changes. One thing is the expansion of options. It would have many substances to compare to the unknown. Thus creating a lot more options for the unknown powder to be. It could also increase the probability of error, from having so many different resources. Sources of error could include adding too much powder and not enough liquid. Doing this could cause the balance to be off. For example, not adding enough liquid could cause the powder to not react. When in reality, the substance usually fizzes or changed color. Doing this experiment made learning about different reactions to different substances

When conducting the experiment the results for each alcohol were where they were anticipated to be supporting the

Survey bias is the next potential survey research problem that can be likely to occur. In survey sampling, bias refers to the tendency of a sample statistic to systematically over or under estimate a population parameter. At the time of the survey, we are to assume that the chosen sample is the representation of the ‘Gen Y’ population and that information provided by the respondents is both accurate and honest. It appears that there was a response bias due to the unconscious misrepresentation and misplacement of the ‘Pepsi’ logo at the top of the survey. This was inadvertent but may have led to a response bias where the respondents appeared to have been influenced by an auspices bias – a bias in the responses of subjects caused by their being influenced by the organization conducting the study (Zikmond et all, 2011).