The world around us changes every day and with that, so do the laws that govern the world in which

Gun control is a controversial issue for a long time around the world, particularly in U.S. because of a lots of mass shooting in school and public places. The second Amendment of the U.S. constitution is one of the shortest in all of the bill of right, it was written by the time period of American’s birth and it is the spirit of self-defense that help the new citizens of U.S. win their own freedom from the British. But now as the gun shooting problem happening every day in America, this gun control problem has gradually become to a hot issue. Compare to other countries like Britain, Canada, Japan, China, the difference between U.S. and those countries is in these countries to get a firearm is a very difficult thing

“The right to bear arms”, an amendment so prioritized by our founding fathers that it earned the very second spot on the list of birth rights as Americans. However, with constant tragedies striking the United States, such as massacres in public high schools and universities, mall shootings, and attempted assassinations on state representatives, it’s no wonder law makers are constantly debating the topic of gun control.

The right to bear arms is a birth given right to all Americans by the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Second Amendment has become controversial recently due to the technological advancement of firearms. Modern firearms are capable of both high rates of fire and greater capacities of ammunition, unlike the single shot muskets that were available at the time of the Second Amendment’s conception. American liberals view these improvements in firearms as dangerous and unnecessary. However, no matter how dangerous firearms may be, the Second Amendment is a necessity for one factor alone: protection from one’s own government and it must be upheld. The Second Amendment provides a physical tool for Americans to defend themselves against a tyrannical government, it allows Americans to form militias against a tyrannical government, and it allows Americans to maintain comparable firearms of the U.S. government in order to prevent the potential loss of American freedoms in the future.

Death, violence, individual rights, crime, and cost are many words that arise when researching the controversial topic of gun control. This issue revolves around the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution and states: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” Is there a black and white answer or is there a need to find a middle ground? The foundational right must be preserved for an individual to own a gun. However, basic safety measures need to be in place for added protection and security of all Americans. To explore why this balance is the best option, it is necessary to look further into the

legislation varies in every state. In some states gun policy is stricter than in other states.

The 2nd amendment is one of the most debated topics in the United States. It’s a very important topic because it concerns every citizen in the country. Many people feel that the 2nd amendment should be repelled to avoid unfortunate incidents such as a weapon landing on the hands of an irresponsible person simply by not securing the firearm appropriately, an increase of street shootings, and accidental trigger pulls. On the other hand, others believe that the right to bear arms is essential to our country because it protects us from devastating events, some of which

People misuse or overuse the right to bear arms. Society believes since it is written in the constitution, we are able to own a gun for individual self defense or other purposes. Notably, the “right of self-defense is described by St. George Tucker as the first law of nature.”” In other cases, people believe it should not be in the constitution because it can be dangerous. However, another theory is that the constitutions defining statement is the people are to protect our democratic values. Uphold our traditional principles by defending against the foreign threats or domestic tyranny. With all of these concluding solutions to the nations debate over the right to bear arms, it is no wonder the U.S. has not come to a final decision. America, of course, will most likely never come to an agreement. Despite the argument, the second amendment is shaped to benefit the

The Second Amendment states that people have the right to bear arms, but this is one of the most controversial and most-debated amendments. This is due to the fact that guns are dangerous, and are not always only used for self-defense. Guns have been used to kill children and faculty in schools, to violently make a political statement, and to threaten and scare citizens. Yet, the Second Amendment still stands. In a recent case, the Supreme Court interpreted the Second Amendment.

The reason why our nation is allowed to bear a large quantity of firearms is due to the Second Amendment of our constitution, which specifically states, "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." (U.S. Const. am. 2) Because of how vague this amendment is when it comes to law interpretation, it is often used by gun advocates to argue for lenient gun laws. Even though the Second Amendment prevents the federal government from completely banning guns in America, there are still restrictions on the distribution and possession of firearms. Each of the states have their own specific gun laws but generally, a person must obtain a license or permit to purchase or possess a firearm. Also, another thing to note is that all states allow some form of concealed carry, which is carrying a concealed firearm in public. Despite the laws that allow the bearing and distribution of guns, society has multiple viewpoints concerning the usage and appropriateness of the freedom of having the "right to bear arms."

The comparison between the two states show how drastically gun regulations can influence the death rate by firearms. In the state of Wyoming, firearm sellers are not required to check gun owner backgrounds. Therefore, gun owners are not obligated to register their guns or have a gun license. That is to say, there is little to no gun regulations in Wyoming giving it the number one spot in the highest gun-related deaths. On the other hand, Massachusetts has the laws that regulate the possession, sale, and use of firearms and ammunition. Once the applicant has sent in their application for a guns permit or license, the applicant must wait 40-days in which the authorities may deny or grant them permission to carry a firearm (“Concealed Weapons”). As stated by the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence, “Massachusetts is a “may-issue” state for the issuance of licenses to carry firearms, meaning that the local licensing authority has discretion in determining whether or not to issue either license type to an applicant” (“Concealed Weapons”). In this case, Massachusetts is significantly stricter than Wyoming and any other state in the country. Thus, with its strict gun laws, it has the lowest gun related death rate and is ranked as fifty on the charts of gun-related deaths (Hendry 2015). This further justifies

America is the most well armed nation in the world, with American citizens owning about 270 million of the world’s 875 million firearms (Marshall). Indeed, this is more than a quarter of the world’s registered firearms. The reason why Americans own so many guns is because of the Second Amendment, which states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” (Rauch) This amendment guarantees U.S. citizens the right to have firearms. Since this amendment is relatively vague, it is up for interpretation, and is often used by gun advocates to argue for lenient gun laws. Hence, gun control is a frequently discussed controversial topic in

When examining the states with the least gun control, Louisiana was listed to be one of the worst states with the least gun laws. (Gun Laws, 2015) explains the current Gun Control Law that Louisiana enforces to its fellow citizens. Louisiana is also known to be called the “Gun Loving state” which allows firearms to be easily obtained by anyone. To obtain a firearm you immediately think that along with a firearm come a lot of procedures to get one. Well not for Louisiana, as long as you have a valid ID and are of the age 18 and 21 owning a gun is looking pretty promising. Under the state’s law you are only required to be 21 years of age to obtain a handgun and only 18 years old to own shotguns or rifles. Louisiana’s State law does not require anyone to have a gun permit, license or a registration. The only few restrictions that pertain to guns within the state is where you are

Intro The subject matter of gun control has aroused quite the controversy over the years leaving our country in dissension. The U.S. Constitution has preserved our second amendment right. On December 15, 1791, the Bill of Rights (the first ten amendments to the Constitution) was adopted, having been approved by three-fourths of the states to safeguard the right of the people to keep and bear arms. Many partisans of guns are continuously claiming that firearms are what kills people; however, when as the last time anyone saw a gun get up and shoot somebody?

Ratified on December 15th 1791 “the Second Amendment provides U.S. citizens [with] the right to bear arms” (Brooks), making gun carry permitted under law. Therefore, guns should not be prohibited as long as the gun and the individual meet federal standards. Lawfully, students capable of possessing a gun license should be allowed to carry them onto any public university. Gun carry is the right of every United States citizen. Yet, many places have banned gun carry, despite the fact that it is written as a basic right in the constitution. The second amendment was established to allow individuals to have the “right to bear arms for the defence of themselves and the state” (Konig). This means that any individual should be allowed to use guns as a way of protecting themselves and others. In the modern day, violence is too great of an issue to prohibit defense weapons. Constantly, violent acts occur in every crevice of every city, but many deny the cold, hard truth. Also, many states, such as Texas, have passed open carry laws. Allowing for the gun(s) to be visible in public places, as long as the individual possesses the correct papers. This means that guns are already a large part of an individual’s daily life in several states. Many find it preposterous that gun carry is prohibited in many places, despite federal and state laws. The only way to justify every individual's rights, is to permit gun

The extension and initiation of various self-defense laws have caused nationwide controversy. Advocates state that law-abiding individuals should be allowed to protect themselves unlawful force without the possibility of being criminally or civilly charged. Correspondingly, the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution grants the federal right to bear arms regardless of militia stature and upholds the natural rights of self-defense. Likewise, legislators argue that individuals visiting or residing in the United States contain the right to remain secure in